Streams and Disturbance: Are Cross-Ecosystem Comparisons Useful?

  • Stuart G. Fisher
  • Nancy B. Grimm


Disturbance is a pervasive influence in all ecosystems, but its effects vary widely. This is true both when quite different ecosystems are compared and when a suite of similar ecosystems, such as streams, is considered. Comparative approaches to ecosystem studies can provide insight into a complex process such as disturbance, but the power to resolve mechanistic questions diminishes as variance among the ecosystems that are compared increases. As a result, the usefulness of the comparative approach in ecosystem studies will depend on the goals of the investigation. Broad principles of ecosystem science may be revealed by comparison of very different ecosystems, but an understanding of underlying mechanisms shaping ecosystem structure and functioning still requires detailed studies of one or a few similar ecosystems. This is especially true when the process of interest is itself complex. Thus, a process such as disturbance may be best studied by comparing similar systems, whereas principles governing simpler attributes, such as decomposition rate or nutrient ratios, may be better elucidated by examining a wide range of ecosystem types.


Flash Flood Biotic Interaction Algal Community Ecosystem Type Stream Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrewartha, H.G. and L.C. Birch. (1954). The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, V.R. (1977). Stream-channel response to floods, with examples from central Texas. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 88:1057–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs, B.J.F. (1988). Algal proliferations in New Zealand’s shallow stony foothillsfed rivers: toward a predictive model. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 23:1405–1411.Google Scholar
  4. Bilby, R.E. and G.E. Likens. 1980. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61:1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock, T.D. and M.L. Brock. (1969). Recovery of a hot spring community from a catastrophe. J. Phycol. 5:75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cody, M.L. and J.M. Diamond, eds. (1975). Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, J.P., C. Young, J. Howell, and W.L. Minckley. (1981). Impact of flooding in a Sonoran Desert stream, including elimination of an endangered fish population (Poeciliopsis o. occidentalis, Poeciliidae). Southwest. Nat. 26:415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell, J.H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, A.B. (1983). Effect of storm events on benthic nitrifying activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:957–960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, S.D., T.L. Dudley, and N. Hemphill. (1986). The biology of chaparral streams in southern California. In: Proceedings of the Chaparral Ecosystem Research Conference, J. DeVries, ed. Report No. 62, Water Resources Center, Davis, California, pp. 139–152.Google Scholar
  11. Covich, A.P. (1988). Geographical and historical comparisons of neotropical streams: biotic diversity and detrital processing in highly variable habitats. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 7:361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, K.W. (1974). Structure and function of stream ecosystems. BioScience 24:631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, K.W., J.J. Klug, R.G. Wetzel, R.C. Petersen, K.F. Suberkropp, B.A. Manny, J.C. Wuycheck, and F.O. Howard. (1972). Organic enrichment with leaf leachate in experimental lotic ecosystems. BioScience 22:719–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cushing, C.E. and E.G. Wolf. (1982). Organic energy budget of Rattlesnake Springs, Washington. Am. Midl. Nat. 107:404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dance, K.W. and H.B.N. Hynes. (1980). Some effects of agricultural land use on stream insect communities. Environ. Pollut. 22:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delucchi, C.M. (1988). Comparison of community structure among streams with different temporal flow regimes. Can. J. Zool. 66:579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elwood, J.W., J.D. Newbold, A.F. Trimble, and R.W. Stark. (1981). The limiting role of phosphorus in a woodland stream ecosystem: effects of P enrichment on leaf decomposition and primary producers. Ecology 62:146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, S.G. (1977). Organic matter processing by a stream-segment ecosystem: Fort River, Massachusetts, USA. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 62:701–727.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, S.G. (1986). Structure and dynamics of desert streams. In: Pattern and Process in Desert Ecosystems, W.G. Whitford, ed. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 119–139.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher, S.G. and N.B. Grimm. (1988). Disturbance as a determinant of structure in a Sonoran Desert stream ecosystem. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 23: 1183–1189.Google Scholar
  21. Fisher, S.G. and G.E. Likens. (1973). Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecol. Monogr. 43:421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher, S.G., L.J. Gray, N.B. Grimm, and D.E. Busch. (1982). Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol. Monogr. 52:93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golladay, S.W., J.R. Webster, and E.F. Benfield. (1987). Changes in stream morphology and storm transport of seston following watershed disturbance. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 6:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goulder, R. (1986). Seasonal variation in the abundance and heterotrophic activity of suspended bacteria in two lowland rivers. Freshwater Biol. 16:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, L.J. (1981). Species composition and life histories of aquatic insects in a lowland Sonoran Desert stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 106:229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray, L.J. and S.G. Fisher. (1981). Postflood recolonization pathways of macroinvertebrates in lowland Sonoran Desert stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 106:249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray, L.J. and J.V. Ward. (1982). Effects of sediment releases from a reservoir on stream macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 96:177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grimm, N.B. (1987). Nitrogen dynamics during succession in a desert stream. Ecology 68:1157–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grimm, N.B. and S.G. Fisher. (1986). Nitrogen limitation in a Sonoran Desert stream. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 5:2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grimm, N.B. and S.G. Fisher. (1989). Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbance by flash floods in a desert stream. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 8:293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gurtz, M.E., G.R. Marzolf, K.T. Killingbeck, D.L. Smith, and J.V. McArthur. (1988). Hydrologic and riparian influences on the import and storage of coarse particulate organic matter in a prairie stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gurtz, M.E. and J.B. Wallace. (1984). Substrate-mediated response of stream invertebrates to disturbance. Ecology 65:1556–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hart, D.D. (1983). The importance of competitive interactions within stream populations and communities. In: Stream Ecology: Application and Testing of General Ecological Theory, J.R. Barnes and G.W. Minshall, eds. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 99–136.Google Scholar
  34. Hart, D.D. (1985). Grazing insects mediate algal interactions in a stream benthic community. Oikos 44:40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hart, S.D. and R.P. Howmiller. (1975). Studies on the decomosition of allochthonous detritus in two southern California streams. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 19:1665–1974.Google Scholar
  36. Hawkins, C.P., M.L. Murphy, N.H. Anderson, and M.A. Wilzbach. (1983). Density of fish and salamanders in relation to riparian canopy and physical habitat in streams of the northwestern United States. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40:1173–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hemphill, N. and S.D. Cooper. (1983). The effect of physical disturbance on the relative abundance of two filter-feeding insects in a small stream. Oecologia 58: 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hilborn, R. and S.C. Stearns. (1982). On inference in ecology and evolutionary biology: the problem of multiple causes. Acta Biotheor. 31:145–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hill, B.H. and T.J. Gardner. (1987). Benthic metabolism in a perennial and intermittent Texas prairie stream. Southwest. Nat. 32:305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoopes, R.L. (1974). Flooding, as the result of Hurricane Agnes, and its effect on a macrobenthic community in an infertile headwater stream in central Pennsylvania. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19:853–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaushik, N.K. and H.B.N. Hynes. (1971). The fate of the dead leaves that fall into streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 68:465–515.Google Scholar
  42. Lay, J.A. and A.K. Ward. (1987). Algal community dynamics in two streams associated with different geological regions in the southeastern United States. Arch. Hydrobiol. 108:305–324.Google Scholar
  43. Lienkaemper, G.W. and F.J. Swanson. (1987). Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Can. J. For. Res. 17:150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Likens, G.E., ed. (1972). Nutrients and Eutrophication. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Special Symposium Vol. 1. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  45. Lodge, D.M. and P. Kelly. (1985). Habitat disturbance and the stability of freshwater gastropod populations. Oecologia 68:111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthews, W.J. (1986). Fish faunal structure in an Ozark stream: stability, persistence and a catastrophic flood. Copeia 1986:388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McArthur, J.V. and G.R. Marzolf. (1986). Interactions of the bacterial assemblages of a prairie stream with dissolved organic carbon from riparian vegetation. Hydrobiologia 134:193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McAuliffe, J.R. (1984). Competition for space, disturbance, and the structure of a benthic stream community. Ecology 65:894–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McElravy, E.P., G.A. Lamberti, and V.H. Resh. (1989). Year-to-year variation in the aquatic macroinvertebrate fauna of a northern California stream. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 8:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, J.L. and G.E. Likens. (1979). Transport and transformation of phosphorus in a forest stream ecosystem. Ecology 60:1255–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Minshall, G.W. and J.N. Minshall. (1978). Further evidence on the role of chemical factors in determining the distribution of benthic invertebrates in the River Duddon. Arch. Hydrobiol. 83:324–355.Google Scholar
  52. Minshall, G.W. and R.C. Petersen. (1985). Towards a theory of macroinvertebrate community structure in stream ecosystems. Arch. Hydrobiol. 104:49–76.Google Scholar
  53. Minshall, G.W., R.C. Petersen, K.W. Cummins, T.L. Bott, J.R. Sedell, CE. Cushing, and R.L. Vannote. (1983). Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 53:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Molles, M.C. (1985). Recovery of a stream invertebrate community from a flash flood in Tesuque Creek, New Mexico. Southwest. Nat. 30:279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mulholland, P.J. (1981). Organic carbon flow in a swamp-stream ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 51:307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murphy, M.L., C.P. Hawkins, and N.H. Anderson. (1981). Effect of canopy modification and accumulated sediment on stream communities. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 110:469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Naiman, R.J., J.M. Melillo, M.A. Lock, T.E. Ford, and S.R. Reice. (1987). Longitudinal patterns of ecosystem processes and community structure in a subarctic river continuum. Ecology 68:1139–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Newbold, J.D., J.W. Elwood, R.V. O’Neill, and W. Van Winkle. (1981). Measuring nutrient spiraling in streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38:860–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Petersen, R.C. and K.W. Cummins. (1974). Leaf processing in a woodland stream. Freshwater Biol. 4:343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peterson, B.J., J.E. Hobbie, and T.L. Corliss. (1986). Carbon flow in a tundra stream ecosystem. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43:1259–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peterson, C.G. (1987). Influences of flow regime on development and desiccation response of lotie diatom communities. Ecology 68:946–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pickett, S.T.A. and P.S. White. (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Power, M.E. and A.J. Stewart. (1987). Disturbance and recovery of an algal assemblage following flooding in an Oklahoma stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 117:333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Power, M.E., W.J. Matthews, and A.J. Stewart. (1985). Grazing minnows, piscivorous bass and stream algae: dynamics of a strong interaction. Ecology 66:1448–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Power, M.E., R.J. Stout, CE. Cushing, P.P. Harper, F.R. Hauer, W.J. Matthews, P.B. Moyle, B. Statzner, and I.R. Wais De Badgen. (1988). Biotic and abiotic controls in river and stream communities. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 7:456–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rae, J.G. (1987). The effects of flooding and sediment on the structure of a stream midge assemblage. Hydrobiologia 144:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Resh, V.H., A.V. Brown, A.P. Covich, M.E. Gurtz, H.W. Li, G.W. Minshall, S.R. Reice, A.L. Sheldon, J.B. Wallace, and R. Wissmar. (1988). The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 7:433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Risser, P.G. (1987). Landscape ecology: state of the art. In: Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, M.G. Turner, ed. Ecological Studies, Vol. 64, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  69. Ross, S.T., W.J. Matthews, and A.A. Echelle. (1985). Persistence of stream fish assemblages: effects of environmental change. Am. Nat. 126:24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rushforth, S.R., L.E. Squires, and CE. Cushing. (1986). Algal communities of springs and streams in the Mt. St. Helens region, Washington, U.S.A. following the May 1980 eruption. J. Phycol. 22:129–137.Google Scholar
  71. Shugart, H.H. and R.V. O’Niell, eds. (1979). Systems Ecology. Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  72. Siegfried, C.A. and A.W. Knight. (1977). The effects of washout in a Sierra foothill stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 98:200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Silsbee, D.G. and G.L. Larson. (1983). A comparison of streams in logged and unlogged areas of Great Smoky Mountain National Park. Hydrobiologia 102: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Skinner, W.D. and D.E. Arnold. (1988). Absence of temporal succession of invertebrates in Pennsylvania streams. Bull. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 5:63.Google Scholar
  75. Soluk, D.A. (1985). Macroinvertebrate abundance and production of psammophilous Chironimidae in shifting sand areas of lowland rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat.Sci. 42:1296–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sousa, W.P. (1984). The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annu. Rev.Ecol.Syst. 15:353–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Steele, J.H. (1985). A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems. Nature (London) 313:355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stout, J. (1980). Leaf decomposition rates in Costa Rican lowland tropical rainforest streams. Biotropica 12:264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tate, C.M. and M.E. Gurtz. (1986). Comparison of mass loss, nutrients, and invertebrates associated with elm leaf litter decomposition in perennial and intermittent reaches of tallgrass prairie streams. Southwest. Nat. 31:511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Towns, D.R. (1981). Effects of artificial shading on periphyton and invertebrates in a New Zealand stream. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 15:185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Urban, D.L., R.V. O’Neill, and H.H. Shugart, Jr. (1987). Landscape ecology. BioScience 37:119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedell, and CE. Cushing. (1980). The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vannote, R.L. and B. Sweeney. (1980). Geographic analysis of thermal equilibria: a conceptual model for evaluating the effect of natural and modified thermal regimes of aquatic insects. Am. Nat. 115:667–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vitousek, P.M. and W.A. Reiners. (1975). Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis. BioScience 25:376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vogl, R.J. 1980. The ecological factors that produce perturbation-dependent ecosystems. In: The Recovery Process in Damaged Ecosystems, J. Cairns, ed. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 63–94.Google Scholar
  86. Ward, A.K., J.A. Baross, C.N. Dahm, M.D. Lilley, and J.R. Sedell. (1983). Qualitative and quantitative observations on aquatic algal communities and recolonization within the blast zone of Mt. St. Helens, 1980 and 1981. J. Phycol. 19:238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ward, J.V. (1985). Thermal characteristics of running waters. Hydrobiologia 125: 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Webster, J.R. and E.F. Benfield. (1986). Leaf breakdown in aquatic ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:567–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Webster, J.R. and J.B. Waide. (1982). Effects of forest clearcutting on leaf break-down in a southern Appalachian stream. Freshwater Biol. 12:331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Webster, J.R., J.B. Waide, and B.C. Patten. (1975). Nutrient recycling and stability of ecosystems. In: Mineral Cycling in Southeastern Ecosystems, F.G. Howell, J.B. Gentry, and M.H. Smith, eds. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  91. Winterbourn, M.J., J.S. Rounick, and B. Cowie. (1981). Are New Zealand stream ecosystems really different? N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 15:321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart G. Fisher
  • Nancy B. Grimm

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations