Advertisement

Proxemics and Privacy: Managing the Problems of Life in Confined Environments

  • Douglas Raybeck
Conference paper

Abstract

Western societies, including the United States, place considerable emphasis on the concept of privacy. Privacy is something to which nearly all Westerners believe they are entitled, and most individuals will go to considerable lengths to establish a territory that they can regard as private, whether this is a house, an apartment, or simply a room. The absence of privacy and the crowding that frequently accompanies such a condition have been blamed for many social ills including greater family friction, increased juvenile delinquency, and the like (Ashcraft & Scheflen, 1976).

Keywords

Interpersonal Interaction Personal Space Experimental Social Psychology Crowded Environment Rest Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, I. (1977). Privacy regulation: Culturally universal or culturally specific? Journal of Social Issues, 33, 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, I. (1979). Privacy as an interpersonal boundary process. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, & D. Ploog (Eds.), Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline (pp. 45–132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ashcraft, N., & Scheflen, A. E. (1976). People space. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Bagchi, B., & Wenger, M. (1957). Electrophysiological correlates on some Yogic exercises. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, (Suppl. 7), 132–149.Google Scholar
  5. Baum, A., Singer, J. E., & Baum, C. S. (1981). Stress and the environment. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 4–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Befu, H. (1971). Japan: An anthropological introduction. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  7. Connors, M. M., Harrison, A. A., & Akins, F. R. (1986). Psychology and the resurgent space program. American Psychologist, 41, 906–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeBeer-Keston, K., Mellon, L., & Solomon, L. Z. (1986). Helping behavior as a function of personal space invasion. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 407–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dore, R. P. (1965). City life in Japan. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, J. N., Booth, A., & Edwards, P. K. (1982). Housing type, stress, and family relations. Social Forces, 61, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, Y. M. (1981). Crowding stress and human behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freedman, J. L. (1975). Crowding and behavior. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  13. Freedman, J. L., Klevansky, S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1971). The effect of crowding on human task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geertz, C. (1960). The religion of Java. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gillis, A. R., Richard, M. A., & Hagan, J. (1986). Ethnic susceptibility to crowding. Environment and Behavior, 18, 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  17. Gregor, T. (1977). Mehinaku: The drama of daily life in a Brazilian Indian village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, E. T. (1969). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, P. R. (1986). The influence of culture on space developments. Behavioral Science, 31, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison, A. A., & Connors, M. M. (1984). Groups in exotic environments. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 18, (pp. 49–87). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we stand now. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 293–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hickson, M. L., & Stacks, D. W. (1985). Nonverbal communication: Studies and applications. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
  24. Knapp, M. L. (1978). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Raybeck, D. (1974). Social stress and social structure in Kelantan village life. In W. Roff (Ed.), Kelantan: Religion, society and politics in a Malay state (pp. 225–242). Kuala Lumpur: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Raybeck, D. (1975). The semantic differential and Kelantanese Malay values. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  27. Raybeck, D. (1986). The elastic rule: Conformity and deviance in Kelantan village life. In S. Carstens, (Ed.), Cultural identity in northern Peninsular Malaysia (pp. 55–74). Columbus: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Raybeck, D. (1988). Anthropology and labeling theory: A constructive critique. Ethos, 16, 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ronchi, D., & Sparcino, J. (1982). Density of dormitory living and stress: Mediating effects of sex, self-monitoring, and environmental affective qualities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 759–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rotton, J. (1987). Hemmed in and hating it: Effects of shape of room on tolerance for crowding. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 285–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Russell, J. A., & Ward, L. W. (1982). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt, D. E., & Keating, J. P. (1979). Human crowding and personal control. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 680–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoonhoven, C. B. (1986). Sociotechnical considerations for the development of the space station. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 3, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Selby, H. (1974). Zapotec deviance. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sherrod, D. R. (1974). Crowding, perceived control and behavioral after-effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 171–186.Google Scholar
  36. Sherrod, D. R., & Downs, R. (1974). Environmental determinants of altruism: The effects of stimulus overload and perceived control on helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sherrod, D. R., Armstrong, D., Hewitt, J., Madonia, B., Speno, S., & Teruya, D. (1977a). Environmental attention, affect and altruism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sherrod, D. R., Hage, J., Halpern, P., & Moore, B. S. (1977b). Effects of personal causation and perceived control on responses to an aversive environment: The more control the better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shostak, M. (1983). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  40. Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Stone, D. L. (1986). Relationship between introversion/extroversion, values regarding control over information, and perceptions of invasion of privacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Takeuchi, T. (n.d.). Social values and interpersonal interaction. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, E. M. (1959). The harmless people. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  44. Wallace, R. K., & Benson, H. (1972, February). The physiology of meditation. Scientific American, 84–90.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, O. W, & Graves, T. D. (1966). Quantitative research in proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 68, 971–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeedyk-Ryan, J., & Smith, G. F. (1983). The effects of crowding on hostility, anxiety, and desire for social interaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 245–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zimring, C. M. (1981). Stress and the designed environment. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Raybeck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations