Acquiring Recoding Competence: Toward a Meaning Driven Interactive Model

Part of the Springer Series in Language and Communication book series (SSLAN, volume 28)


As children move from prereading into reading, they come to understand how the writing system represents speech. Those who read logographic scripts realize that speech is transcribed at the word level; children who learn syllabaries discover that the syllable is the level of representation; readers of alphabets find that it is the phoneme, or sound, that is the unit of transcription. These three levels of print-to-speech representation—word, syllable and sound—provide beginning readers with significantly different options for recognizing and learning written words. Whereas readers of logographic writing systems must put considerable time and energy into remembering a unique written symbol for each spoken word, those who learn to read alphabets can pronounce a great many words with the knowledge of relatively few symbol-to-sound correspondences. Alphabets therefore offer beginning readers an economical, sound-based route to word learning, provided that would-be readers can use the print-to-speech map.


Word Recognition Phonological Awareness Word Identification Word Learning Phonological Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning from print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alegria, J., Pignot, E., & Morais, J. (1982). Phonetic analysis of speech and memory codes in beginning readers. Memory and Cognition, 10, 451–456.Google Scholar
  3. Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114–133.Google Scholar
  4. Bady, J.A., & Leslie, L. ( 1988, December). When do skilled and less-skilled readers utilize context clues? Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, E.W., & Blachman, B.A. (1988). Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness. Annals of Dyslexia, 8, 208–225.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, J. (1979). Orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in children’s reading of words. Child Development, 50, 60–72.Google Scholar
  7. Barron, R.W. (1986). Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect access hypotheses. Cognition, 24, 93–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Biemiller, A. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 6, 75–96.Google Scholar
  9. Biemiller, A. (1977-1978). Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 78, 223–253.Google Scholar
  10. Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663–687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.Google Scholar
  12. Brady, S. (1986). Short-term memory, phonological processing, and reading ability. Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 138–153.Google Scholar
  13. Bruce, D.J. (1964). The analysis of word sounds by young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 158–170.Google Scholar
  14. Bryant, P., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 121–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.). Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Doctor, E.A., & Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory and Cognition, 8, 195–209.Google Scholar
  17. Dreyer, L.G. ( 1989, November-December). The relationship of children’s phonemic memory to phonological decoding in reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  18. Ehri, L.C. (1980). The role of orthographic images in learning printed words. In J.F. Kavanagh, & R.L. Venezky (Eds.), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia (pp. 155–170 ). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ehri, L.C. (1983). A critique of five studies related to letter-name knowledge and learning to read. In L.M. Gentile, M.L. Kamil, & J.S. Blanchard (Eds.), Reading research revisited (pp. 143–153 ). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  20. Ehri, L.C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In J. Downing, & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and earning to read (pp. 119–147 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Ehri, L.C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5–31.Google Scholar
  22. Ehri, L.C. (1988). The development of spelling skill and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  23. Ehri, L.C. (1989). The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 356–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehri, L.C., & Wilce, L.S. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners to read words? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 47–65.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, M.A., & Carr, T.H. (1985). Cognitive abilities, conditions of learning, and the early development of reading skill. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 327–350.Google Scholar
  26. Fischer, K.W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.Google Scholar
  27. Foorman, B.R., & Liberman, D. (1989). Visual and phonological processing of words: A comparison of good and poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 349–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fowler, C.A., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. (1979). Apprehending spelling patterns for vowels: A developmental study. Language and Speech, 22, 243–252.Google Scholar
  29. Fox, B., & Routh, D.K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331–342.Google Scholar
  30. Fox, B., & Routh, D.K. (1976). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 70–74.Google Scholar
  31. Fox, B., & Routh, D.K. (1980). Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 115–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, B., & Routh, D.K. (1983). Reading disability, phonemic analysis, and dys- phonetic spelling: A follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 28–32.Google Scholar
  33. Fox, B., & Routh, D.K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059–1064.Google Scholar
  34. Freebody, P., & Byrne, B. (1988). Word-reading strategies in elementary school children: Relations to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 441–453.Google Scholar
  35. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and Cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Gibson, E.J. (1965). Learning to read. Science, 148, 1066–1072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gibson, E.J. (1970). The ontogeny of reading. American Psychologist, 25, 13–143.Google Scholar
  38. Gibson, E.J. (1971). Perceptual learning and the theory of word perception. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 351–368.Google Scholar
  39. Gibson, E.J., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Glushko, R.J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The Psychology of phonol-ogy. In A.M. Lesgold & C.A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–83 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Goldstein, D.M. (1976). Cognitive-linguistic functioning and learning to read in preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 680–688.Google Scholar
  42. Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83.Google Scholar
  43. Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 239–268.Google Scholar
  44. Goswami, U. ( 1989, April). Orthographic units and transfer in reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  45. Gough, P.B., Juel, C., & Roper/Schneider, D. (1983). Code and cipher: a two- stage conception of initial reading acquisition. In J.A. Niles, & L.A. Harris (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 207 - 211 ). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  46. Hakes, D.T. (1980). The development of metalinguistic abilities in children. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Helfgott, J. A. (1976). Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children: Implications for beginning reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 157–169.Google Scholar
  48. Hohn, W.E., & Ehri, L.C. (1983). Do alphabet letters help prereaders acquire phonemic segmentation skill? Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 752–762.Google Scholar
  49. Huba, M.E. (1984). The relationship between linguistic awareness in prereaders and two types of experimental instruction. Reading World, 23, 347–363.Google Scholar
  50. Juel, C. (1980). Comparison of word identification strategies with varying context, word type, and reader skill. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 359–376.Google Scholar
  51. Juel, C. (1983). The development of mediated word identification. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 306–327.Google Scholar
  52. Juel, C., Griffith, P.L., & Gough, P.B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.Google Scholar
  53. Juel, C., & Roper/Schneider, D. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 134–152.Google Scholar
  54. Kay, J., & Marcel, A. (1981). One process, not two, in reading words aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 397–413.Google Scholar
  55. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.Google Scholar
  56. Lewkowicz, N.K. (1980). Phonemic awareness training: What to teach and how to teach it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 686–700.Google Scholar
  57. Lesgold, A., Resnick, L.B., & Hammond, K. (1985). Learning to read: A longitudinal study of word skill development in two curricula. In G.E. MacKinnon, & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 107–138 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Leslie, L., & Shannon, A.J. (1981). Recognition of orthographic structure during beginning reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 313–324.Google Scholar
  59. Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F.W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.Google Scholar
  60. Lomax, R.G., & McGee, L.M. (1987). Young children’s concepts about print and reading: Toward a model of word reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 237–256.Google Scholar
  61. Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.Google Scholar
  62. MacLean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–281.Google Scholar
  63. Mann, V.A. (1986). Phonological awareness: The role of reading experience. Cognition, 24, 65–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Marsh, G., Desberg, P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Developmental changes in reading strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 391–394.Google Scholar
  65. Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A Cognitive- developmental theory of reading acquisition. In G.E. MacKinnon, & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 199–221 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. McCormick, C., & Samuels, S.J. (1979). Word recognition by second graders: The unit of perception and interrelationships among accuracy, latency, and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 107–118.Google Scholar
  67. Morais, J., Alegria, J., & Content, A. (1987). The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 415–438.Google Scholar
  68. Niles, J.A., & Taylor, B.M. (1978). The development of orthographic sensitivity during the school year by primary grade children. In P.D. Pearson, & J. Hansen (Eds.), Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practice (pp. 41–44 ). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  69. Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pace, A.J., & Golinkoff, R.M. (1976). Relationship between word difficulty and access of single-word meaning by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 760–767.Google Scholar
  71. Patterson, K.E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall, & M. Colt- heart (Eds.), Surface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 335–359 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  72. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Perfetti, C.A., Beck, I., Bell, L.C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar
  74. Peters, A.M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Reid, C., Yun-Fei, Z., Hong-Yin, N., & Bao-Quing, D. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31–44Google Scholar
  76. Reitsma, P. (1984). Sound priming in beginning readers. Child Development, 55, 406–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Rohrlack, C.R., Bell, B.J., & McLaughlin, T.F. (1982). The value of auditory blending skills for reading readiness programs. Educational Research Quarterly, 7, 41–47.Google Scholar
  78. Rosner, J., & Simon, D.P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.Google Scholar
  79. Samuels, S.J., Laberge, D., & Bremer, C.D. (1978). Units of word recognition: Evidence for developmental changes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 715–720.Google Scholar
  80. Schworm, R.W. (1979). Word mediation and generalization in beginning readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 139–151.Google Scholar
  81. Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I.Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In J.F. Kavanaugh & I.G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 293–317 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  82. Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties in decoding. In D. Shankweiler & I.Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 35–68 ). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  83. Share, D.L., Jorm, A.F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.Google Scholar
  84. Smith, F. (1988). Understanding reading ( 4th ed. ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  85. Stahl, S.A., Jacobsen, M.G., Davis, C.E., & Davis, R.L. (1989). Prior knowledge and difficult vocabulary in comprehension of unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 27–43.Google Scholar
  86. Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 76, 32–71.Google Scholar
  87. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 360–406.Google Scholar
  88. Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Feeman, D.J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 79, 278–303.Google Scholar
  89. Stuart, M., & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition, 76, 139–181.Google Scholar
  90. Surber, J.R., & Mason, J.M. (1977). Effects of rule-consistent examples in learning letter-sound correspondences. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 400–404.Google Scholar
  91. Treiman, R. (1984). Individual differences among children in spelling and reading styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 463–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Treiman, R., & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory and Cognition, 77, 382–389.Google Scholar
  94. Tunmer, W.E., & Bowey, J.A. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition. In W.E. Tunmer, C. Pratt, & M.L. Herriman (Eds.), Metalinguistic Awareness in Children (pp. 144–168 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  95. Tunmer, W.E., & Fletcher, C.M. (1981). The relationship between conceptual tempo, phonological awareness, and word recognition in beginning readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 173–185.Google Scholar
  96. Tunmer, W.E., Herriman, M.L., & Nesdale, A.R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 134–158.Google Scholar
  97. Turvey, M.T., Feldman, L.B., & Lukatela, G. (1984). The Serbo-croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading perspectives from congnitive psychology (pp. 81–89 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  98. Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.Google Scholar
  99. Venezky, R.L. (1967). English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly, 11, 75–105.Google Scholar
  100. Venezky, R.L. (1976). Prerequisites for learning to read. In J.R. Levin, & V.L. Allen (Eds.), Cognitive learning in children: Theories and strategies (pp. 163–185 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  101. Wagner, R.K. (1988). Causal relations between the development of phonological processing abilities and the acquisition of reading skills: A meta-analysis. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 34, 261–278.Google Scholar
  102. Wagner, R.K., & Torgensen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.Google Scholar
  103. Wallach, M.A., & Wallach, L. (1976). Teaching all children to read. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  104. Wallach, L., Wallach, M.A., Dozier, M.G., & Kaplan, N.E. (1977). Poor children learning to read do not have trouble with auditory discrimination but do have trouble with phoneme recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 36–39.Google Scholar
  105. Walsh, D.J., Price, G.G., & Gillingham, M.G. (1988). The critical but transitory importance of letter naming. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 108–122.Google Scholar
  106. Waters, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 72, 293–305.Google Scholar
  107. Yopp, H.K., & Singer, H. (1985). Toward an interactive reading instructional model: Explanation of activation of linguistic awareness and metalinguistic ability in learning to read. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading ( 3rd ed., pp. 135–143 ). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations