Advertisement

Gibberellins pp 211-219 | Cite as

The Gibberellin Control of Cell Elongation

  • M. Katsumi
  • K. Ishida

Abstract

The most typical physiological effect of gibberellin (GA) is the stimulation of shoot elongation, and recent studies with dwarf plants of maize, pea, rice, and others have clearly shown that GA is a key hormone controlling plant height.1,2 However, the mechanism of GA stimulation of shoot growth has yet to be clarified.

Keywords

Epidermal Cell Cell Elongation Cellulose Microfibril Cortex Cell Cortical Microtubule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Phinney BO. Gibberellin A1, dwarfism and the control of shoot elongation in higher plants. In: Crozier A, Hillman J, eds. The biosynthesis and metabolism of plant hormones. Soc. Exp. Biol. Seminar Ser. 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984: pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacMillan J. Gibberellin deficient mutants of maize and pea and molecular basis of gibberellin action. In: Hoad GV, Lenton JR, Jackson MB, et al, eds. Hormone action in plant development-a critical appraisal. London: Butter-worths, 1987: pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taiz L. Plant cell expansion: Regulation of cell wall mechanical properties. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1984; 35: 585–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cosgrove DJ. Biophysical control of plant cell growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1986; 37: 377–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ray PM. Principles of plant cell growth. In: Cosgrove DJ, Knievel DJ, eds. Physiology of cell expansion during plant growth. Symposium in Plant Physiology, Pennsylvania State University. Rockville, Maryland: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 1987: pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ende J, Koornneef P. Gibberellic acid and osmotic pressure. Nature. 1968; 219: 510–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katsumi M, Kazama H. Gibberellin control of cell elongation in cucumber hypocotyl sections. Bot Mag Tokyo. 1978; Special Issue 1: 141–158.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katsumi M, Kazama H, Kawamura N. Osmotic potential of the epidermal cells of cucumber hypocotyls as affected by gibberellin and cotyledons. Plant Cell Physiol. 1980; 21: 933–937.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kazama H, Katsumi M. Gibberellin-induced changes in the water absorption, osmotic potential and starch content of cucumber hypocotyls. Plant Cell Physiol. 1983; 24: 1209–1216.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adams PA, Montague MJ, Tepfer M, et al. Effect of gibberellic acid on the plasticity and elasticity of Avena stem segments. Plant Physiol. 1975; 56: 757–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kawamura H, Kamisaka S, Masuda Y. Regulation of lettuce hypocotyl elongation by gibberellic acid. Correlation between cell elongation, stress-relaxation properties of the cell wall and wall polysaccharide content. Plant Cell Physiol. 1976; 17: 23–34.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakamura T, Sekine S, Arai K, et al. Effects of gibberellic acid and indole-3acetic acid on stress-relaxation properties of pea hook cell wall. Plant Cell Physiol. 1975; 16: 127–138.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stuart DA, Jones RL. Roles of extensibility and turgor in gibberellin-anddark-stimulated growth. Plant Physiol. 1977; 59: 61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cosgrove DJ, Sovonick-Dunford SA. Mechanism of gibberellin-dependent stem elongation in pea. Plant Physiol. 1989; 89: 184–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cleland R, Thompson ML, et al. Differences in effects of gibberellins and auxins on wall extensibility of cucumber hypocotyls. Nature. 1968; 219: 510–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cleland RE. The mechanism of wall loosening and wall extension. In: Cosgrove DJ, Knievel DJ, eds. Physiology of cell expansion during plant growth. Symposium in Plant Physiology, Pennsylvaria State University. Rockville, Maryland: American Society of Plant Physiologists. 1987: pp. 18–27.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shibaoka H. Involvement of wall microtubules in gibberellin promotion and kinetin inhibition of stem elongation. Plant Cell Physiol. 1974; 15: 255–263.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shibaoka H, Hogetsu T. Effects of ethyl N-phenylcarbamate on wall micro-tubules and on gibberellin-and kinetin-controlled cell expansion. Bot Mag Tokyo 1977; 90: 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mita T, Shibaoka H. Gibberellin stabilizes microtubules in onion leaf sheath cells. Protoplasma. 1984; 119: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mita T, Shibaoka H. Effects of S-3307, an inhibitor of gibberellin biosynthesis, on swelling of leaf sheath cells and on the arrangement of cortical microtubules in onion seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 1984; 25: 1531–1539.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mita T, Katsumi M. Gibberellin control of microtubule arrangement in the mesocotyl epidermal cells of the d5 mutant of Zea mays L. Plant Cell Physiol. 1986; 27: 651–659.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Preston RD. The physical biology of plant cell walls. London: Chapman and Hall, 1974: pp. 383–409.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ledbetter MC, Porter KP. A “microtubule” in plant cell fine structure. J Cell Biol. 1963; 19: 239–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gunning BES, Hardham AR. Microtubules. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1982; 33: 651–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robinson DG, Quader H. The microtubule-microfibril syndrome. In: Lloyed CW, ed. The cytoskelton in plant growth and development. London: Academic Press, 1982: pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lloyed CW. Toward a dynamic helical model for the influence of microtubules on wall patterns in plants. Int Rev Cytol. 1984; 86: 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iwata K, Hogetsu T. Arrangement of cortical microtubules in Avena coleoptiles and mesocotyls and Pisum epicotyls. Plant Cell Physiol. 1988; 29: 807–815.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iwata K, Hogetsu T. The effects of light irradiation on microtubule orientation in seedlings of Avena sativa L. and Pisum sativum L. Plant Cell Physiol. 1989; 30: 1011–1016.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steen DA, Chadwick AV. Ethylene effects in pea stem tissue: Evidence of microtubule mediation. Plant Physiol. 1981; 67: 460–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lang JM, Eisinger WR, Green PB. Effects of ethylene on the orientation of microtubules and cellulose microfibrils of pea epicotyl cells with polylamellate walls. Protoplasma. 1982; 110: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roberts IN, Lloyed CW, Roberts K. Ethylene-induced microtubule reorientations: Mediation by the helical arrays. Planta. 1985; 116: 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hogetsu T. Immunofluorescence microscopy of microtubule arrangement in root cells of Pisum sativum L. var. Alaska. Plant Cell Physiol. 1986; 27: 939–945.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Katsumi
  • K. Ishida

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations