Limits of General Deterrence: The Case of Juvenile Delinquency

  • Karl F. Schumann
  • Reiner Kaulitzki
Part of the Research in Criminology book series (RESEARCH CRIM.)


Despite the abundance of research papers published in scientific journals on issues of deterrence during the last two decades, we hope there may be methodological as well as theoretical reasons to read about a deterrence study done in West Germany.


Crime Rate Deterrent Effect Penal Code Juvenile Justice System Juvenile Delinquency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albrecht, H.J. (1980). Die generalpräventive Effizienz von strafrechtlichen Sanktionen. In Kaiser, G. (Ed.), Empirische Kriminologie (pp. 305–327). Freiburg: Max-Planck-Institut.Google Scholar
  2. Andenaes, J. (1974). Punishment and deterrence. Ann Arbor; MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L.S. (1977). Longitudinal study of the deterrence model. Ann Arbor; MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H.S. (1963). Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beyleveld, D. (1980). A Bibliography on general deterrence research. Westmead: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, D.M. (1982). Deterrence and social control: A longitudinal study of the effects of sanctioning and social bonding on the prevention of delinquency. Doctoral dissertation, SUNY-Albany. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International. Google Scholar
  7. Chambliss, W.J. (1967). Types of deviance and the effectiveness of legal sanctions. Wisconsin Law Review, 703–719.Google Scholar
  8. DiChiara, A., & Galliher, J.F. (1984). Thirty years of deterrence research: Characteristics, causes and consequences. Contemporary Crises, 8, 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson, M.L., Gibbs, J.P., & Jensen, G.F. (1977). The deterrence doctrine and the perceived certainty of legal punishment. American Sociological Review, 44, 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erickson, M.L., & Gibbs, J.P. (1978). Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and the deterrence doctrine. Social Problems, 25, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gartner, R.I. (1985). The perceived risks and returns of crime: An individual-level panel study of deterrence. Ann Arbor, MI: Microfilms.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbs, J.P. (1975). Crime, punishment and deterrence. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs, J.P. (1979). Assessing the deterrence doctrine. American Behavioral Scientist, 23, 653–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grasmick H.G. (1981). The strategy of deterrence research: A reply to Greenberg. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 1102–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, G.S. (1985). General deterrence and television cable crime: A field experiment in social control. Criminology, 23, 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberg, D.F., Kessler, R.C., Logan, C.H. (1979). Aggregation bias in deterrence research: An empirical analysis. Journal of Research in Cime and Delinquency, 18, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofer, H., Tham, H. (1975). Beware of general prevention! In National Swedish Council for Crime Prevention (Ed.), General deterrence (pp. 257–270). Stockholm: NSCCP. Google Scholar
  18. Jesilow, P.D. (1982). Deterring automobile repair fraud: Afield experiment. Ann Arbor: Microfilms.Google Scholar
  19. Lundman, R.J. (1986). One-wave perceptual deterrence research: some grounds for the renewed examination of cross-sectional methods. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 370–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayer, H. (1936). Das Strafrecht des Deutschen Volkes. Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar
  21. Meier, R.F. (1978). The deterrence doctrine and public policy: A response to utilitarians. In Cramer, J.A. (Ed.), Preventing crime (pp. 233–246). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Meier, R.F., Burkett, S.R., & Hickman, S.A. (1984). Sanctions, peers, and deviance: Preliminary models of a social control process. The Sociological Quarterly, 25, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meier, R.F., & Johnson, W.T. (1977). Deterrence as social control: The legal and extralegal production of conformity. American Sociological Review, 42, 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Minor, H.W., & Harry, J. (1982). Deterrent and experiental effects in perceptual deterrence research: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagin, D. (1978). General deterrence: A review of the empirical evidence. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, A., & Nagin, D. (Eds.), Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates, (pp. 95–139). Washington, D.C. Government.Google Scholar
  26. Printing Office. Parker, J., Grasmick, H.G. (1979). Linking actual and perceived certainty of punishment. Criminology, 17, 366–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1986). The deterrent effects of perceived severity: A reexamination. Social Forces, 64, 751–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Piliavin, L, Thornton, C, Gartner, R., & Matsueda, R.L. (1986). Crime, deterrence and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rausch, S.P. (1982). Perceptions of sanctions, informal controls, and deterrence: A longitudinal Analysis. Ann Arbor; MI: Microfilms.Google Scholar
  30. Ross, L.H. (1982). Deterring the drinking driver. Lexington; MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  31. Ross, L.H. (1984). Social control through deterrence: drinking-and-driving laws. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruhland, D.J., Gold, M., & Heckman, R.J. (1982). Deterring juvenile crime. Youth and Society, 13, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saltzman, L.E., Paternoster, R., Waldo, G.P., & Chiricos, T.G. (1982). Deterrent and experiental effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 172–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schöch, H. (1985). Empirische Grundlagen der Generalpravention. In Vogler, T. (Ed.), Festschrift fiir Hans Heinrich Jescheck (pp. 1081–1105). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  35. Schumann, K.F., Berlitz, C, Guth, H.W., & Kaulitzki, R. (1984). Lassen sich generalpräventive Wirkungen des Jugendstrafrechts nachweisen? In DVJJ (Ed.), Jugendgerichtsverfahren und Kriminalprävention (pp. 281–286). München: DVJJ.Google Scholar
  36. Schumann, K.F., Berlitz, C, Guth, H.W., & Kaulitzki, R. (1987). Jugendkrimi-nalitt und die Grenzen der General-prävention. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  37. Schumann, K.F. (1989). Positive Generalprävention. Ergebnisse und Chancen der Forschung. Heidelberg: Müller.Google Scholar
  38. Silberman, M. (1976). Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. American Sociological Review, 42, 442–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tittle, C.R. (1977). Sanction fear and the maintenance of social order. Social Forces, 55, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tittle, C.R. (1980a). Sanctions and social deviance. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  41. Tittle, C.R. (1980b). Evaluating the deterrent effects of criminal sanctions. In Klein, M.W., & Teilman, K.S. (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation (pp. 381–402). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Thomas, C.W., & Bishop, D.M. (1984). The effect of formal and informal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal comparison of labeling and deterrence theories. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1222–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker, N., & Argyle, M. (1964). Does the law affect moral judgements? British Journal of Criminology, 24, 570–81.Google Scholar
  44. Watson, R.E.L. (1986). The effectiveness of increased police enforcement as a general deterrent. Law and Society Review, 20, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, K.R., & Gibbs, J.P. (1981). Deterrence and knowledge of statutory penalities. The Scoiological Quarterly, 22, 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, K.R., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law and Society Review, 20, 544–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer- Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl F. Schumann
  • Reiner Kaulitzki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations