Skip to main content
  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

The contributions of Fabri and Pardies have led us towards new points of view. Fabri’s “intermediate force” opens up questions on the deformation of a beam, and points towards an explanation of resistance itself. Pardies’s study of the equilibrium of ropes, and his peculiar model for a beam, a “string carrying beads,” change the context in which Galileo’s problem must be placed. For the first time, the concept of lengthening and shortening longitudinal fibers (the cords in the model) is connected to resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Truesdell, Rational Mechanics, cit

    Google Scholar 

  2. see also Essays in the History of Mechanics (New York, 1968) (hereafter cited as Truesdell, Essays).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Beeckman, Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634, facsimile ed. C. De Waard (The Hague, 1939–1953), fols. 137 bis v, 139 bis v.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., fol. 362r.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Todhunt er and K. Pearson, op. cit., Vol. 1, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted in R.T. Gunther, Early Science in Oxford (Oxford, 1931), Vol. 8, pp. 331ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 367.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Truesdell, Rational Mechanics p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Mariotte, “Traité du mouvement des eaux et des autres corps fluides…,” in Œuvres de M. Mariotte, de l’Académie Royale des Sciences…, new ed. (The Hague, 1740), p. 461.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 462.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 465.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.W. Leibniz, “Demonstrationes novae de resistentia solidorum,” Acta eruditorum Lipsiae (July, 1684), pp. 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., pp. 322–325.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Truesdell, Rational Mechanics, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Bernoulli, Opera omnia tarn antea sparsim, quam hactenus inedita (Lausanne and Geneva, 1742) Vol. 3, pp. 385–558.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Gregory, “Catenaria,” Philosophical Transactions, Vol. 19, No. 231 (August 1697), pp. 637–652, reprinted in Acta eruditorum Lipsiae (July 1698), pp. 303–321

    Google Scholar 

  22. see p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Bernoulli, “Specimen alterum calculi differentialis in dimetienda spirali logarithmica, loxodromiis nautarum, et areis triangulorum sphaericorum: una cum additamento quodam ad problema funicularium, aliisque,” Acta eruditorum Lipsiae (June 1691), pp. 282–290. Reprinted in Opera Omnia, Vol. 1, pp. 442–453 and in Leibnizens mathematische Schriften, Vol. 5, pp. 252–254.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Truesdell, op. cit., p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Bernoulli, Veritable hypothèse de la résistance des solides, avec la démonstration de la courbure des corps qui font ressort,” Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences (1706), pp. 176–186; see p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Varignon, “De la résistance des solides en générale pour tout ce qu’on peut faire d’hypothèses touchant la force ou la ténacité des fibres des corps à rompre; et en particulier pour les hypothèses de Galilée et de M. Mariotte,” Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences (1702), pp. 66–100.

    Google Scholar 

  27. In Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, année 1702 (Paris, 1720), p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Parent, “De la véritable mécanique des résistances relatives des solides, et reflexions sur le système de M. Bernoulli de Bâle,” Recherches de mathématique et de physique (Paris, 1713), Vol. 3, pp. 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.A. Coulomb, “Essai sur une application des règles de maximis et minimis à quelques problèmes de statique relatifs à l’architecture,” Mémoires de mathématique et de physique, par divers savants, Vol. 7 (1776), pp. 343–382.

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Musschenbroek, Demonstrationes physicae, experimentales et geomtricae (Leiden, 1729), p. 622.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 660.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Truesdell, Essays, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  33. P.S. Girard, Traité analitique de la résistance des solides et des solides d’égale résistance (Paris, 1798) p. xliii.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., pp. ix–x.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., p. xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., pp. xvi–xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., pp. lii–liii.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid., Ibid., p. liii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benvenuto, E. (1991). Early Theories of the Strength of Materials. In: An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2982-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2982-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7745-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2982-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics