Advertisement

Electrophoretic Analysis of the Proteins Newly Formed as a Consequence of Pollen-Pistil Interaction

  • Gabriella Bergamini-Mulcahy
  • D. L. Mulcahy
  • A. Kalinowski
  • W. A. Smith
Conference paper

Abstract

The present research is aimed at investigating if the stylar activation phenomenon varies according to the type of pollen applied. Through electrophoretic analysis of the newly formed proteins of the style ahead of the pollen tubes we determine the specificity of the stylar response to different (but congruous) pollens. Similarly through the analysis of semivitro pollen tubes, grown through different styles, we can learn if there is a specific stylar input on the growing tubes.

Keywords

Pollen Tube Pollen Tube Growth Electrophoretic Analysis Petunia Hybrida Progame Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brewbaker, JL, Kwack, BH 1963. The essential role of calcium in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am. J. Bot. 50: 859–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deurenberg, JJM 1976. In vitro protein synthesis with polysomes from unpollinated, cross- and self-pollinated Petunia ovaries. Planta 128: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Herrero, M., Dickinson, HG 1979. Pollen-pistil incompatibility in Petunia hybrida: changes in the pistil following compatible and incompatible crosses. J. Cell Sci. 36: 1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Heukeskoven, J., Demicls, R. 1985. Simplified method for silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels and the mechanism of silver staining. Electrophoresis 6: 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hochstrasser, DF, Harrington, MG, Hochstrasser, AC, Miller, MJ, Merril, CR 1988. Methods for increasing the resolution of two-dimensional protein electrophoresis. Analytical Biochem. 173: 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurkman, WJ, Tanaka, CK 1986. Solubilization of plant membrane proteins for analysis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. 81: 802–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jensen, WA, Ashton, ME, Beasley, CA 1983. Pollen tube—ac interaction in cotton. In: Mulcahy, DL, Ottaviano, E., eds. Pollen: Biology and Implication for Plant Breeding 67–72. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Linskens, HF, Spanjers, AW 1973. Changes of the electrical potential in the transmitting tissue of Petunia styles after cross- and self-pollination. Incompatibility Newsletter 3: 81–85.Google Scholar
  9. Mulcahy, GB, Mulcahy, DL 1985. More evidence on the preponderant influence of the pistil on pollen tube growth. In: Biology of Reproduction and Cell Motility in Plants and Animals. Cresti, M. and Dallai, R., eds. pp. 139–144.Google Scholar
  10. Mulcahy, GB, Mulcahy, DL 1986. Use of vital dyes in conjunction with the semivitro technique for the detection of pollen tube sperm nuclei. Stain Technology, Vol. 61: 382–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nasrallah, JB, Kao, TH, Goldberg, ML, Nasrallah, ME 1985. A cDNA encoding an S-locus specific glycoprotein from Brassica oleracea. Nature 318: 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roggen, H.P.J.R. 1967. Changes in enzyme activities during the progame phase in Petunia hybrida. Thesis Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Sinyukhin, A.M., Britikov, E.A. 1967. Action potentials in the reproductive system of plants. Nature 215: 1278–1280.Google Scholar
  13. Yi-quin, Li and Linskens, HF 1983. Wall-bound proteins of pollen tubes after self- and cross-pollination in Lilium longiflorum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriella Bergamini-Mulcahy
  • D. L. Mulcahy
  • A. Kalinowski
  • W. A. Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations