Abstract
Factor analysis is a very frequently used methodology. Users not only in the social sciences but also in geography, medicine, chemistry, biology and economics like it. There are mainly two interpretations of the common factor analysis model as a data analytic procedure or as a stochastic model:
-
The common factor analysis as a data analytic procedure. In this case the common factors and the parameters have no substantial meaning. They just serve to represent the observable variables, as it is, for instance, done by the principal components.
-
The common factor analysis model as a causal model. In this case the unobservable common factors are considered as “true” indipendent variables linked by a linear relation with the observable variables. The common factors and the factor loadings are “true” as the regressors and the parameters in the regression model. As in the regression model, the true parameters are to be estimated with the observations on the variables. Furthermore the determination of the common factor scores is of great importance, because the parameters have only a substantial meaning knowing the underlying factors.
Chapter PDF
References
Anderson, T.W., Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 5, 111–150. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
Efflers, H., Bethlehem, J., and Gill, R. (1978). Indeterminacy problems and the interpretation of factor analysis results. Statistica Neerlandica 32, 181–199.
Gorsuch, R.L. (1990). Common Factor Analysis versus Component Analysis: Some Well and Little Known Facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 33–39.
Haagen, K. and Oberhofer, W. (1992). On the Indeterminacy in the Common Factor Model. Technical Report 36, Dept. of Statistics, University of Trento, Italy.
Kano, Y. (1984). Construction of Additional Variables Conforming to a Common Factor Model. Statistics & Probability Letters 2, 241–244.
Loehlin, J.C. (1990). Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: A Case of Disputed Authorship. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 29–31.
McDonald, R.P. (1977). The Indeterminacy of Components and the Definition of Common Factors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 30, 165–170.
Mulaik, St. A. (1990). Blurring the Distinction Between Component Analysis and Common Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 53–59.
Oberhofer, W., and Haagen, K. (1991). The Replicated Common Factor Model. Technical Report 145, Dept. of Economics, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Rao, C. R: (1973). Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2 nd Ed. Wiley, New York.
Schönemann, P.H. (1990). Facts, Fictions and Common Sense About Factors and Components. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 47–51.
Steiger, J.H. (1979). Factor Indeterminacy in the 1930s and in the 1970s. Some Interesting Parallels. Psychometrika 44, 157–167.
Steiger, J.H., and Schönemann, P.H. (1978). A History of Factor Indeterminacy,. in She, S. (E.). Theory Construction and Data Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Steiger, J.H. (1990). Some additional thoughts on components, factors and factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 41–45.
Velicer, W.F. and Jackson, D.N. (1990) Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some Issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 1–28.
Williams, J.S. (1978). A Definition for the Common Factor Analysis Model and the Elimination of Problems of Factor Score Indeterminacy. Psychometrika 43, 293–306.
Williams, J.S. (1979). A Synthetic Basis for a Comprehensive Factor-Analysis Theory. Biometrics 35, 719–733.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Oberhofer, W., Haagen, K. (1992). Common Factor Model Stochastic Model, Data Analysis Technique or What?. In: Fahrmeir, L., Francis, B., Gilchrist, R., Tutz, G. (eds) Advances in GLIM and Statistical Modelling. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 78. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2952-0_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2952-0_24
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97873-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2952-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive