Intervention Research in Australia

  • Adrian F. Ashman
  • Christina E. Van Kraayenoord
  • John Elkins
Part of the Disorders of Human Learning, Behavior, and Communication book series (HUMAN LEARNING)

Abstract

The Australian context for research in learning disabilities differs substantially from that which pertains in North America, particularly under PL 94–142 in the United States. In brief, no Australian education authority has recognized learning disabilities as a category for the purpose of special education funding. This is not to say that Australian children do not experience difficulties in learning or that teachers do not take special measures to help students overcome such difficulties. Thus this chapter deals with intervention research which is more broadly focused than studies in learning disabilities typically have been. To explain why Australian perspectives differ in the learning disabilities area, though not in other aspects of special education, some brief historical analysis is warranted, some of which has been discussed previously by Elkins (1983) and by van Kraayenoord and Elkins (1990).

Keywords

Clay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, R.J., Elkins, J., Berry, P.B., & Burge, J.A. (1979). A survey of special education in Australia: Provisions, needs and priorities in the education of children with handicaps and learning difficulties. St. Lucia: Fred and Eleanor Schonell Educational Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Ashman, A.F., & Conway, R.N.F. (1989a). Cognitive strategies in special education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ashman, A.F., & Conway, R.N.F. (1989b). A practical guide to accompany process-based instruction. Newcastle: Huntersearch.Google Scholar
  4. Ashman, A.F., & Conway, R.N.F. (1991). Teaching students to use process-based instructional strategies in mainstream classes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Council for Educational Research. (1976). Class Achievement Tests in Mathematics. Hawthorn, Victoria: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Council for Educational Research. (1977). ACER Mathematics Profile Series: Operations Test. Hawthorn, Victoria: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Ballard, K.D. (1990). Special education in New Zealand: Disability, politics and empowerment. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 37, 109–124.Google Scholar
  8. Cadman, A.G. (Chairman). (1976). Learning difficulties in children and adults. Report of the House of Representatives Select Committee on Specific Learning Difficulties. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, J.W. (1987, December). The self-concepts of learning disabled children. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  10. Chapman, J.W., Silva, P.A., & Williams, S. (1984). Academic self-concept: A study of academic and emotional correlates in nine-year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clay, M.M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155–173.Google Scholar
  12. Condon, D., & Maggs, A. (1986). Direct instruction research: An international focus. International Journal of Special Education, 1, 35–47.Google Scholar
  13. Connolly, A.J., Nachtman, W., & Pritchett, F.M. (1976). Keymath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  14. Das, J.F., Kirby, J., & Jarman, R.F. (1979). Simultaneous and successive cognitive processing. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Den Boer, K. (1990). Special education in The Netherlands. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 5, 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of Education, Queensland. (1991). Focus on the learner: Senior schooling curriculum framework. Brisbane: Author.Google Scholar
  17. Elkins, J. (1975). Reading disability research in Australia. The Slow Learning Child, 22, 109–119.Google Scholar
  18. Elkins, J. (1983). The concept of learning difficulties: An Australian perspective. In J.D. McKinney & L. Feagans (Eds.), Current topics in learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 179–203). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  19. Elkins, J. (in press). Effectiveness of differential programming. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Vol. 2. Research and studies. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  20. Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517–529.Google Scholar
  21. Gillespie-Silver, P. (1979). Teaching reading to children with special needs. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  22. Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  23. Keogh, B.K. (1989, March). Models for the study of risk. Paper presented at the Special Education SIG Meeting, AERA, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  24. Keogh, B.K., Major-Kingsley, S., Omori-Gordon, H., & Reid, H.P. (1982). A system of marker variables for the field of learning disabilities. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kirk, S.A. (1963). Behavioral diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. In Proceedings of the Conference on Exploration into the Problems of the Perceptually Handicapped Child. Chicago: Perceptually Handicapped Children. [Reprinted in Kirk, S.A., & Lord, F.E. (1974). Exceptional children: Educational resources and perspectives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.]Google Scholar
  26. Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., O’Donnell, A.M., Hythecker, V.I., Lambiotte, J.C., & Rocklin, T.R. (1985). Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity, on cooperative learning and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology,10, 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, P.J. (1983). Aspects of metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 6, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mossenson, L., Hill, P., & Masters, G. (1987). TORCH—Tests of Reading Comprehension. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  29. Neale, M.D. (1988). Analysis of reading ability (2nd ed.). Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  30. New South Wales Department of Education. (1979). Communication curriculum—K-12. Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
  31. Nicholls, J.G. (1979). Development of perception of own attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Otto, W., & McMenemy, R.A. (1966). Corrective and remedial teaching: Principles and practices. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  33. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paris, S.G., Saarino, D.A., & Cross, D.R. (1986). A metacognitive curriculum to promote children’s reading and learning. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodbard, G. (1990). Going Dutch! A perspective on the Dutch system of special education. European Journal of Special Needs Education,5, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sampson, O.C. (1975). Remedial education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Stipek, D. (1981). Children’s perceptions of their own and their classmates’ ability. Journal of Educational Psychology,73, 404–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sweller, J. (1990). Cognitive processes and instructional procedures. Australian Journal of Education, 34, 125–130.Google Scholar
  39. van Kraayenoord, C., & Elkins, J. (1990). Learning difficulties. In A. Ashman & J. Elkins (Eds.), Educating children with special needs (pp. 104–147). Sydney: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. van Kraayenoord, C.E., Elkins, J., & Ashman, A.F. (1989, November–December). Reading difficulties, metacognition and affect. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  41. Westwood, D.S. (1979). Helping children with spelling difficulties. Adelaide, SA: Education Department of South Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian F. Ashman
  • Christina E. Van Kraayenoord
  • John Elkins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations