Advertisement

Self-Regulated Strategy Development: Programmatic Research in Writing

  • Steve Graham
  • Karen R. Harris
Part of the Disorders of Human Learning, Behavior, and Communication book series (HUMAN LEARNING)

Abstract

The program of intervention research described in this chapter represents a marriage of our separate interests and expertise to a common problem. Steve Graham’s primary preoccupation has involved writing development and instruction, especially in relation to students with learning disabilities (LD). Karen Harris, in contast, has focused her attention on the applicability of cognitive behavior modification and integrative cognitive theories to the academic, cognitive, and social problems exhibited by children with severe learning problems. As a result, a major portion of our scholarly efforts during the last ten years has focused on the application of cognitive strategy instruction to the teaching of writing to students with learning disabilities.

Keywords

Strategy Instruction Learn Disability Learn Disability Metacognitive Knowledge Disable Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alverez, V., & Adelman, H. (1986). Over-statements of self-evaluations by students with psychoeducational problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18,567–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Applebee, A. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. Petrosky, D. Barhholomae, & K. Rehage (Eds.), The teaching of writing: Eighty-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 95–113). Chicago: Universtity of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beauregrande, R. de (1984). Text production: Toward a science of composition. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednarczyk, A., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1990). [Story grammar instruction to improve reading comprehension]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from tests. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.Google Scholar
  6. Danoff, B., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1990). [Story grammar and strategy instruction in written language with learning disabled and normally achieving students]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  7. Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Englert, C., Raphael, T., Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students’ meta-cognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, S. (1983). The effects of self-instructional procedures on LD students’ handwriting performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students’ compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, S., & Freeman, S. (1986). Strategy training and teacher vs. student-controlled study conditions: Effects on learning disabled students’ spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly,9, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1987). Improving composition skills of inefficient learners with self-instructional strategy training. Topics in Language Disorders,7, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1988). Instructional recommendations for teaching writing to exceptional students. Exceptional Children, 54, 506–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1989a). Cognitive training: Implications for written language. In J. Hughes & R. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 247–279). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, S., & Harris K.R. (1989b). A components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students’ compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham, S., & Harris K.R. (1989c). Improving learning disabled students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training. Exceptional Children, 56, 201–214.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1990). Self-instructional strategy development. LD Forum, 16, 15–22.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (in press a). Cognitive strategy instruction in written language for learning disabled students. In S. Vogel & B. Levinson (Eds.), Educational alternatives for learning disabled students. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (in press b). Teaching writing strategies to students with learning disorders: Issues and recommendations. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Strategy and processing deficits in learning disorders. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (in press). Writing instruction. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities. New York: Academic press.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Sawyer, R. (1987). Composition instruction with learning disabled students: Self-instructional strategy training. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
  24. Graham, S., & MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students’ skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self-instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education, 22, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., & Voth, T. (in press). Improving LD students’ compositions using a strategy involving product and process goal-setting. Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  26. Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C. (1990). [Learning disabled and normally achieving students’ knowledge of the writing process]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, K.R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, K.R. (1985). Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues in cognitive- behavioral assessment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 373–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, K. (1986a). Self-monitoring of attentional behavior vs. self-monitoring of productivity: Effects on on-task behavior and academic response rate among learning disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, K.R. (1986b). The effects of cognitive-behavior modification on private speech and task peformance during problem solving among learning disabled and normally achieving children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14,63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students’ composition skills: Self-control strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly,8, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1988). Self-instructional strategy training: Improving writing skills among educationally handicapped students. Teaching Exceptional Children,20, 35–37.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (in press). Helping young writers master the craft: Strategy instruction and self-regulation in the writing process. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Freeman, S. (1988). Effects of strategy training on metamemory among learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 54, 332–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Pressley, M. (in press). Cognitive behavioral approaches in reading and written language: Developing self-regulated learners. In N.N. Singh & I.L. Beale (Eds.), Current perspectives in learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Harris, K.R., McElroy, K., Hamby, R., Graham, S., & Reid, B. (1990). [A comparison of self-monitoring of attention and self-monitoring of productivity: Effects on spelling study behavior and story writing.] Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  37. Harris, K.R., Preller, D., & Graham, S. (1990). Acceptability of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris, K.R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–404.Google Scholar
  39. Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psycholgist, 41, 1106–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Humes, A. (1983). Research on the composing process. Review of Educational Research, 53, 201–216.Google Scholar
  41. MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students’ composing with three methods: Handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Journal of Special Education, 21, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., & Graham, S. (in press). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.Google Scholar
  44. MacArthur, C., & Stoddard, B. (1990). Teaching LD students to revise: A peer editor strategy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  46. Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pericola, L., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (in press). Improving the mathematical problem solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-instructional strategy development. Journal of Special Education.Google Scholar
  48. Pressley, M., & Harris, K.R. (1990). What is really known about cognitive strategy instruction. Educational Leadership, 48, 31–34.Google Scholar
  49. Pressley, M., & Levin, J. (1986). Elaboration learning strategies for the inefficient learner. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 175–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Reid, B., & Harris, K.R. (1990). [A comparison of self-monitoring of productivity with self-monitoring of attention on LD students’ on-task behavior, study behavior, and spelling achievement]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  51. Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1989). [Improving learning disabled students’ composition skills with story grammar strategy training: A further components analysis of self-instructional strategy training]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  52. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., Alley, G., & Warner, M. (1983). Toward the development of an intervention model for learning disabled adolescents. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 45–74.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, C., Englert, C., & Gregg, S. (1987). An analysis of errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wong, B. (1985). Issues in cognitive-behavioral interventions in academic skill areas. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 425–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wong, B.Y.L., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1991). Cognitive-behavioral procedures: Academic applicants with students with learning disabilities (p. 245–275). In P.C. Kendall (Ed.), Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wong, B., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents’ composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 330–323.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Graham
  • Karen R. Harris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations