Summary
Fundamental to the classical program of orthodox cognitive science is a conception of mental representation based on self-contained systems of formal symbols which require separate principles of interpretation to fix their semantics. This paper critically examines some conceptions of semantic interpretation that have come out of this view of representation. These include proposals which construe interpretation as an internal computational process, and alternative perspectives which view interpretation in terms of the extrinsic attribution of meaning to cognitive systems. It is argued that proposals of both types in various ways presuppose rather than genuinely explain the semantics of the mental. An alternative view is then proposed which construes interpretation, not in terms of attaching a meaning to a meaningless form, but in terms of relating meaning as pre-interpretively understood to meaning as more explicitly articulated.
Preparation of this paper was supported by a Canada Research Fellowship (Award No. 455-87-0170) awarded to the author by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. A more extended treatment of the issues in this paper is to appear in Theory & Psychology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Kline, P. J., & Neves, D. M. (1981). Acquisition of problem-solving skill. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 191–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coulter, J. (1989). Mind in action. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
Davies, D. J. M., & Isard, S. D. (1972). Utterances as programs. In B. Meltzer, & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine Intelligence 7 (pp. 325–339). New York: Wiley.
Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Heil, J. (1981). Does cognitive psychology rest on a mistake? Mind, 90, 321–342.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in mind: The bodily basis of reason and imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1977). Procedural semantics. Cognition, 5, 189–214.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988a). How is meaning mentally represented? In U. Eco, M. Santambrogio, & P. Violi (Eds.), Meaning and mental representations (pp. 99–118). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988b). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, D. (1987). Mental representation from the bottom up. Synthese, 70, 23–78.
Lloyd, D. (1989). Simple minds. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 135–183.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113–126.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Sayre, K. M. (1986). Intentionality and information processing: An alternative model for cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 121–165.
Sayre, K. M. (1987). Cognitive science and the problem of semantic content. Synthese, 70, 247–269.
Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.
Smythe, W. E. (1992). Positivism and the prospects for cognitive science. In C. W. Tolman (Ed.), Positivism in psychology: Historical and contemporary problems (pp. 103–118). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Smythe, W. E. (forthcoming). Post-foundationalism in cognitive science.
Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Woods, W. A. (1981). Procedural semantics. In A. K. Joshi, I. Sag, & B. L. Webber (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smythe, W.E. (1993). Perspectives on Interpretation for Cognitive Science. In: Stam, H.J., Mos, L.P., Thorngate, W., Kaplan, B. (eds) Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2746-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2746-5_18
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97963-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2746-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive