Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 165 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 79))

Abstract

In ”classical” mathematical statistics one assumes that a statistical decision (e.g. point estimator for a parameter, test of hypotheses, curve estimator, confidence interval for a parameter, etc.) has to be made on the basis of a fixed number n of observed values x 1,…, x n — large parts of the corresponding theory may be found in the books by Lehmann [Le], Bickel/Doksum [B/D] or Witting [Wi1], [Wi2]. For many practical applications this is just the description of the situation the statistician is confronted with: After the observations have been made the investigator shows up with his data and asks for advice on how to analyze them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Proceeding in this way the statistician at the same time reaches a new ”position” within the statistical investigation: While in classical statistics he often has to try to make the best from data which have been collected without consulting him, he now has influence on the pattern (the sampling rules and the final sample size) of the experiment.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [y] denotes the smallest integer ≥ y and u α/2 is the α/2-quantile of the N(0, l)-distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dodge, H.F./ Romig, H.G.: A method of sampling inspection. Bull. Syst. Techn. J. 8(1929), 613–631

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartky, W.: Multiple sampling with constant probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 14(1943), 363–377

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. For an extended description of the work of that group we refer to the article ”The Statistical Research Group, 1942–1945” by W.A. Wallis; J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75 (1980), 320–335

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham Wald, born Oct. 31. 1902 in Cluj (Romania), studied in Vienna, emigrated in 1938 to USA, died Dec. 13. 1950 by an aeroplane crash in India. He made important contributions to geometry, mathematical economics and to statistical decision theory.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For the anecdote that Wald had as enemy alien no access to his own research results comp, the article by W.A. Wallis (footnote 5).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Statistical Research Group, Columbia University (1945): Final Report (submitted to the Applied Mathematics Panel, National Defense Research Committee in completion of research under Contract OEMsr-618 between the trustees of Columbia University and the Office of Scientific Research and Development).

    Google Scholar 

  9. We refer to the report ”Sequential tests in industrial statistics”, J. Royal Statist. Soc., Supplement 8 (1946), 1–26 (with discussion) by G.A. Barnard.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnard, G.A.: Economy in sampling with special reference to engineering experimentation. Brit. Min. Supply Adv. Serv., Stat. Math. and Qual. Control. Techn. Report QC/R/7,I (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wald, A./ Wolfowitz, J.: Optimum character of the sequential probability ratio test. Ann. Math. Statist. 19(1948), 326–339.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Arrow, K.I./ Blackwell, D./ Girshick, M.A.: Bayes and minimax solutions of sequential decision problems. Econometrica 17(1949), 213–244.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. This situation will be called ”iid case”.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Exceptions arise in ”open ended tests” in which infinite samples are accepted for one hypothesis (e.g. for the superior drug).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dr. K.-H. Eger (TH Chemnitz, Germany) has computed these values by using the algorithm contained in his book [Eg]; for computational reasons he used pi = 0,90016837105.

    Google Scholar 

  16. All these values have been computed by Dr. Marion Harenbrock (Institut für Mathematische Statistik der Univ. Münster)

    Google Scholar 

  17. The index M will be omitted when there is no possibility of misunderstanding.

    Google Scholar 

  18. To avoid further terminological complications we assume the same set M for all stages; (external) restrictions will be regarded when defining sampling plans.

    Google Scholar 

  19. [x] describes the largest integer ≤ x.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ”0” corresponds to the decision ”no further observation”.

    Google Scholar 

  21. a1,…,ao):=().

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitz, N. (1993). Introduction. In: Schmitz, N. (eds) Optimal Sequentially Planned Decision Procedures. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 79. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2736-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2736-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97908-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2736-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics