Advertisement

The Composition of a Composition: Just the Facts

  • Stuart Greene
  • Larry Wasserman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 83)

Abstract

This paper investigates the way that writers select information from multiple sources. Two groups of students wrote compositions about the reconstruction of Europe after the war. The first group wrote a report, the second group had the task of suggesting a reconstruction plan. The essays were decomposed into individual content units (facts). Each fact could be classified as coming from a set of given sources or not. Also, those from sources could further be sub-divided as being present in one source, two sources or several sources. We compared the groups by (1) total facts used and (2) distribution of facts used from various texts. We report an analysis based on standard methods that are used by researchers to analyze data from these types of studies. We briefly critique these methods and re-analyze the data using Bayesian methods. For (2) we used a hierarchical multinomial model. Posterior distributions were estimated by Monte Carlo and a sensitivity analysis was conducted on the prior.

Keywords

Bayesian Statistics Text Structure Source Text Problem Group Credible Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, J.M. (1989)Reading and writing in the academy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.C., and Pichert, J. (1978) Recall of previously unrecalled information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R.C., Pichert, J., and Shirley, L.L. (1983) Effects of the reader’s schema at different points in time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Applebee, A. (1984) Contexts of learning to write. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, J. (1984) The robust Bayesian viewpoint (with discussion). InRobustness in Bayesian Statistics. (J. Kadane ed.): North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J. (1985)Statistical Decision Theory. (2nd Edition). Springer-Verlag: New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickel, P., and Doksum, K. (1977) Mathematical Statistics. NY: Holden-Day, Inc.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkmire, D.P. (1985) Text processing: The influence of text structure, background knowledge, and purpose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bower, G.H. (1976) Experiments on story understanding and recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeRobertis, Lorraine and Hartigan, J.A. (1981) Bayesian inference using intervals of measures. Ann. Statist., 9, 235–244.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Durst, R. (1987) Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 347–375.Google Scholar
  12. Gelfand, A. and Smith, A. (1990) Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 85 398–409.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene, S. (1991)Writing from sources. Authority in text and task. Center for the Study of Writing at Carnegie Mellon University and University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T.A. (1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langer, J.A., and Applebee, A.N. (1987) How writing shapes thinking(Research Rep. No. 22). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  16. Mandler, J.M., and Johnson, J.S. (1977) Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9 111–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer, B.J.F. (1975) The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Memory. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Meyer, B.J.F. (1985) Prose analysis; Purposes, procedures and problems. In B. Britton and J. Black. (Eds.), Understanding Expository Text(pp. 11–64) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, B.J.F., and Freedle, R.O. (1984) Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121–143.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, B.J.F., and McConkie, G. (1973) What is recalled after hearing a passage? Journal of Educational Psychology, 65 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pichert, J., and Anderson, R. (1977) Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roller, C.M. (1990) Commentary: The interaction of knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruggeri, F. and Wasserman, L. (1991) Density based classes of priors: infinitesimal properties and approximations. Technical report #528, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  24. Rumelhart, D.E. (1977) Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. Laberge, and S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Snedecor, G., and Cochran, W. (1980) Statistical methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Spiro, R. (1980) Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, ( 245–278 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Spivey, N.N. (1983) Discourse synthesis: Constructing texts in reading and writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  28. Spivey, N.N. (1984) Discourse synthesis: Constructing texts in reading and writing (Outstanding Dissertation Monograph Series). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  29. Spivey, N.N. (1987) Construing constructivism: Reading research in the United States. Poetics, 16, 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spivey, N.N. and King, J. (1989) Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner, A. and Greene, E. (1978) The construction and use of a propositional text base. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 3 (ms. #1713).Google Scholar
  32. Wasserman, L. (1992a) Recent methodological advances in robust Bayesian inference. To appear in Bayesian Statistics IV: Fourth Valencia International Meeting on Bayesian Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. Wasserman, L. (1992b) Invariance properties of density ratio priors. To appear: Ann. Statist.Google Scholar
  34. Wasserman, L.A. and Kadane, J. (1992) Computing bounds on expectations. To appear: J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Greene
    • 1
  • Larry Wasserman
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations