Advertisement

Regeneration of Plants from Somatic Cell Cultures: Applications for in vitro Genetic Manipulation

  • Charles L. Armstrong
Part of the Springer Lab Manuals book series (SLM)

Abstract

Plant regeneration from in vitro cultures of maize was first reported in 1975 by Green and Phillips. Steady improvements have been made since then in the culture systems and in applying them in genetic studies. Protoplasts have been regenerated into fertile plants by several groups (Prioli and Sondahl 1989; Shillito et al. 1989; Morocz et al. 1990). Selection experiments have yielded disease- and herbicide-resistant plants (Gengenbach et al. 1977; Shaner and Anderson 1985). Fertile transgenic plants are now reproducibly obtained in some laboratories through either direct DNA delivery into protoplasts or particle bombardment of intact, cultured cells. Successful applications of corn tissue culture technology have been largely limited to large research groups. The goal of this chapter is to present a simple how-to guide for successful establishment of maize somatic cell tissue cultures suitable for in vitro genetic manipulation. Attention is focused on model genotypes and also on minor technical details that are important, yet difficult to find elsewhere.

Keywords

Somatic Embryo Immature Embryo Culture Response Fertile Transgenic Plant Cell Culture Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbe EC, Stein OL (1954) The origin of the shoot apex in maize: embryogeny. Am J Bot 41: 285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong CL, Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline. Planta 164: 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for rice anther culture through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sin (Peking) 18: 659–668Google Scholar
  4. Close KR, Ludeman LA (1987) The effect of auxinlike plant growth regulators and osmotic regulation on induction of somatic embryogenesis from elite maize inbreds. Plant Science 52: 81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan DR, Williams ME, Zehr BE, Widholm JM (1985) The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zea mays L. genotypes. Planta 165: 322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gengenbach BG, Green CE, Donovan CM (1977) Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 5113–5117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, O’Brien JV, Chambers SA, Adams WR, Jr, Willets NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG (1990) Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2: 603–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Green CE, Phillips RL (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci 15: 417–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morocz S, Donn G, Nemeth J, Dudits D (1990) An improved system to obtain fertile regenerants via maize protoplasts isolated from a highly embryogenic suspension culture. Theor Appl Genet 80: 721–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prioli LM, Sondahl MR (1989) Plant regeneration and recovery of fertile plants from protoplasts of maize (Zea mays L.). Bio/Technology 7: 589–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaner DL, Anderson PC (1985) Mechanism of action of the imidazolinones and cell culture selection of tolerant maize. In Zaitlin M, Day P, Hollaender A, Wilson CM (eds) Biotechnology in Plant Science: Relevance to Agriculture in the Eighties, Academic Press, New York, pp 287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shillito RD, Carswell GK, Johnson CM, DiMaio JJ, Harms CT (1989) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of elite inbred maize. Bio/Technology 7: 581–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Songstad DD, Armstrong CL, Petersen WL (1991) AgNO3 increases type-II callus production from immature embryos of maize inbred B73 and its derivatives. Plant Cell Rep 9: 699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles L. Armstrong

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations