Skip to main content

Can Multiple Criteria Methods Help Production Scheduling?

  • Conference paper
Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

Operational Research has contributed in a number of ways to production scheduling; the development of algorithms to identify optimal solutions to simple problems; the development of heuristics to quickly find good solutions to complex problems; and the use of visual interactive modelling to provide a flexible and easy to use tool for production schedulers.

These contributions have had significant practical impact. However, some difficulties remain and one of these is related to the multiple criteria nature of the problem. Commonly used heuristics tend to be based on a single criterion rule, a very simple example being “Schedule the job with shortest processing time first”. The heuristic may produce a schedule which performs well against one objective, for example, to minimise the number of jobs late, but does not meet the scheduler’s requirements against other criteria, for example, minimising stock, or controlling maximum lateness. However, although the scheduler can easily identify shortcomings of a schedule with the support of appropriate software, he or she may be unable to identify what changes to make to improve the situation.

The aim of our research is, through the development of a multiple criteria scheduling heuristic, to provide the scheduler with a control mechanism. This will allow him or her to indicate how they would like the solution to change and by appropriately adjusting the heuristic produce a new schedule which moves towards the specified objectives.

As a first step we have been working with a simple multiple criteria heuristic, implemented as a visual interactive decision support system, to investigate the feasibility of such a control mechanism. In this paper we will demonstrate this system and report on the results of some initial experimental work. The next stage of the research will depend on the results of this experimental work; if the multiple criteria heuristic used yields the desired results we can move towards implementing the control mechanism, for which we will explore the use of expert systems and neural networks; if the simple heuristic proves to be ineffective we will have to investigate a more complex approach. We will report on progress at the Conference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Applegate D. and Cook W. (1991) “A Computational Study of the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem” ORSA Journal on Computing 3 149–156.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elder M.D. (forthcoming) “Interacting with the Plan” Paper presented at Operational Research Society Conference 1990, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddy E., Bright J.G. and Johnston K.J. (1991) “Visual Interactive Modelling” in Littlechild S.C. and Shutler M.F. (Eds) “Operations Research in Management Science” Prentice Hall, London 222–235

    Google Scholar 

  • French S. (1982) “Sequencing and Scheduling” Wiley, Chichester.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gravel M., Martel J.M., Nadeau R., Price w. and Tremblay R. (1991) “A Multicriterion View of Optimal Resource Allocation in Job-Shop Production” presented to IFORS SPC1 on Decision Support Systems, Bruges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta Y.P., Evans G.W. and Gupta M.C. “A Review of Multi-Criterion Approaches to FMS Scheduling Problems” International Journal of Production Economics 22 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C.V. (1988) “The Three-Dimensional Gantt Chart.” Operations Research 36 891–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor P. (1966) “A Review of Job-Shop Scheduling” Operational Research Quarterly 17 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Diaz F. and French S. “A Survey of Multi-Objective Combinatorial Scheduling” in French S., Hartley R., Thomas L.C. and White D.J. (eds) (1983) “Multi-objective Decision Making” Academic Press, London. 59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen T. and Gupta S.K. (1984) “A State-of-Art Survey of Static Scheduling Research Involving Due Dates” OMEGA 12 63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker L.J. and Woolven J.D. (1991) “Development and use of a Visual Interactive Planning Board with Alcan Aluminium” Presented at Mini-Euro Conference on Visual Interactive Modelling, Warwick 1988 European Journal of Operational Research 54 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Belton, V., Elder, M.D. (1994). Can Multiple Criteria Methods Help Production Scheduling?. In: Tzeng, G.H., Wang, H.F., Wen, U.P., Yu, P.L. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2666-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2666-6_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7626-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2666-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics