A Century of Brain-Mind Theory

  • Alwyn Scott


Cherished by poets, savored by gourmets, revered by lovers, and worshiped by mystics, consciousness is also a landscape of guilt and agony, remorse and pain. For the scientist and the philosopher, consciousness is intriguing because it continues—after centuries of study—to challenge our need to understand and to explain. We continue to wonder just what it is.


Conscious Experience Previous Chapter Neural Event Necker Cube Reductive Materialism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. B J Baars and K McGovern. Does philosophy help or hinder scientific work on consciousness? Consciousness Cognition, 2:18–27, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. F Beck and J C Eccles. Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 89:11357–11361, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. H W Bode. Network analysis and feedback amplifier design. D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, New Jersey, 1945.Google Scholar
  4. D J Chalmers. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. In Toward a science of consciousness, S R Hameroff, A W Kaszniak, and A C Scott, editors. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. F Crick. The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994a.Google Scholar
  6. F Crick. Interview on The astonishing hypothesis. J. Consciousness Stud., 1:10–17, 1994b.Google Scholar
  7. F Crick and C Koch. Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Semin. Neurosci., 2:263–275, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. D C Dennett. Consciousness explained. Little, Brown, Boston, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. J C Eccles. Evolution of consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 89:7320–7324, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J C Eccles. How the self controls its brain. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. R K C Forman. ‘Of capsules and carts’: Mysticism, language and the via negativa. J. Consciousness Stud., 1:38–49, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. E Harth. The creative loop: How the brain makes a mind. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. E Harth. Self-referent mechanisms as the neuronal basis of consciousness. In Toward a science of consciousness, S R Hameroff, A W Kaszniak, and A C Scott, editors. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. D O Hebb. The organization of behavior. Wiley, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
  15. D O Hebb. Essay on mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. T Honderich. The time of a conscious sensory experience and mind brain theories. J. Theor. Biol., 110:115–129, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. W James. Principles of psychology. Holt, New York, 1890; republished by Dover, New York, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. S Kosslyn, N M Alpert, W L Thompson, V Maljkovic, S B Wise, C F Chabris, S E Hamilton, S L Rauch, and F S Buonanno. Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations. J. Cognit. Neurosci., 5:263–287, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. B Libet. Electrical stimulation of cortex in human subjects, and conscious sensory aspects. In Handbook of sensory physiology, A Iggo, editor. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. B Libet. Subjective antedating of a sensory experience and mind-brain theories: Reply to Honderich. J. Theor. Biol., 114:563–570, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. B Libet, E W Wright, Jr, B Feinstein, and D K Pearl. Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience. Brain, 102:191–222, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. B Mangan. Dennett, consciousness, and the sorrows of functionalism. Consciousness Cognition, 2:1–17, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. V W Mark. Conflicting communicative behavior in a split brain patient: Support for dual consciousness. In Toward a science of consciousness, S R Hameroff, A W Kaszniak, and A C Scott, editors. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. R Penrose. The emperor’s new mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. R Penrose. Interview on Shadows of the mind. J. Consciousness Stud., 1:17–24, 1994a.Google Scholar
  26. R Penrose. Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994b.Google Scholar
  27. K R Popper and J C Eccles. The self and its brain. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. G Santayana. The sense of beauty. Dover Publications, New York, 1955 (first published in 1896).Google Scholar
  29. E Schrödinger. What is life?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944 (reprinted 1967).Google Scholar
  30. E Schrödinger. Mind and matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958 (reprinted 1967).Google Scholar
  31. O Selfridge. Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. Brain, in the proceedings of the Symposium on the mechanism of thought processes. H.M. Stationery Office, London, 1959.Google Scholar
  32. J R Searle. The rediscovery of the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992.Google Scholar
  33. B F Skinner. Beyond freedom and dignity. Bantam/Vintage, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  34. R W Sperry. Forebrain commissurotomy and conscious awareness. J. Med. Philos., 2:101–126, 1977.Google Scholar
  35. H P Stapp. Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
  36. P Stoerig and A Cowey. Wavelength sensitivity in blindsight. Nature, 342:916–918, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. J Toribio. Why there still has to be a theory of consciousness. Consciousness Cognition, 2:28–47, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. A M Turing. Can a machine think? Mind, 59:433–460, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. J B Watson. Behaviorism. Norton, New York, 1924.Google Scholar
  40. L Weiskrantz. Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
  41. N Wiener. Cybernetics. The Technology Press and Wiley, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1961.Google Scholar
  42. E P Wigner. Are we machines? Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 113:95–101, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alwyn Scott

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations