The Foot

  • Charles N. Cornell

Abstract

Until recently, interest in operative management of fractures of the foot and use of internal fixation for reconstruction and arthrodesis has been minimal. But over the past two decades advances in fracture surgery have conclusively documented that lower extremity function is better when normal anatomy is restored and prolonged casting is avoided following injury. In view of the realization that the lower extremity cannot function without a sound foot, there has been an explosive increase in interest in applying principles of internal fixation to the foot.I As with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) elsewhere, the four goals of internal fixation in the foot are (1) restoration of normal anatomy with rapid union, (2) preservation of blood supply to the operative area, (3) achievement of stable internal fixation that meets the biomechanical demands of the foot, and (4) mobilization and functional weight bearing as early as possible.

Keywords

Titanium Arthritis Hexa Immobilization Explosive 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hansen ST. Foot injuries. In: Browner D, ed. Skeletal trauma, vol 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992; 1959–1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mann R. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. In: Mann R, ed. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993; 3–45.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sangeorzan BJ. Foot and ankle joint. In: Hansen ST, Swiontkowski MF, eds. Orthopedic Trauma Protocols. New York: Raven Press, 1993; 350–353.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mayo KA. Fractures of the talus: principles of management and techniques of treatment. Tech Orthop 1987; 2: 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hawkins LG. Fractures of the neck of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52A: 991–1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canale ST, Kelly FB. Fractures of the neck of the talus. Long-term evaluation of seventy-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg 1978; 60A: 143–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koval KJ, Sanders R. The radiographic evaluation of calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop 1993; 290: 4146.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carr JB. Mechanism and pathoanatomy of the intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Clin Orthop 1993; 290: 36–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benirschke SK. Results of operative treatment of os calcis fractures. Paper Presented at AAOS, New Orleans, Feb. 8–12, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Can JB, Hansen ST, Benirschke SK. Surgical treatement of foot and ankle trauma. Use of indirect reduction techniques. Foot Ankle 1989; 9: 176.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carr JB, Hansen ST, Benirschke SK. Subtalar distraction bone block fusion for late complications of os calcis fractures. Foot Ankle 1989; 9: 81–86.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK, Mosca V, Mayo KA, Hansen ST. Displaced intraarticular fractures of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71A: 1504–1510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eichenholtz SN, Levine DB. Fractures of the tarsal navicular. Clin Orthop 1964; 34: 142–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sangeorzan BJ, Verth RG, Hansen ST. Salvage of Lisfranc’s tarsometatarsal joint by arthrodesis. Foot Ankle 1990: 10: 193–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amtz CT, Verth RG, Hansen ST. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1988; 70A: 173–181.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles N. Cornell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations