Advertisement

Workshop: Statistical Methods for Combining Environmental Information

  • Lawrence H. Cox
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 132)

Abstract

Primary objectives of the NISS-USEPA cooperative research agreement were to identify important environmental problems to which statistical science could contribute, to perform interdisciplinary research on these problems and stimulate related research and problem identification within the broader statistical community, to assess important examples and areas of environmetric research, and to identify new research problems and directions. To provide a forum for identifying and examining new research and problem areas, a NISS-USEPA workshop series was established within the cooperative research program.

Keywords

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Passive Smoking Snow Water Equivalent Lung Cancer Mortality Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breslow, N. and Day, N. (1980). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. I. The Analysis of Case-Control Studies, Vol. 32. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, S., Day, G., Cressie, N. and Carroll, T. (1995). Spatial modeling of snow water equivalent using airborne and ground-based snow data. Envi-ronmetrics 6, 127–139.Google Scholar
  3. Cox, D., Cox, L. and Ensor, K. (1997). Spatial sampling and the environment: Some issues and directions. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, L.H. and Piegorsch, W.W. (1994). Combining environmental information: Environmetric research in ecological monitoring, epidemiology, toxicology, and environmental data reporting. Technical Report 12. National Institute of Statistical Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, L.H. and Piegorsch, W.W. (1996). Combining environmental information I: Environmental monitoring, measurement and assessment. Environ-metrics 7, 299–308.Google Scholar
  6. DuMouchel, W. (1994). Hierarchical Bayes linear models for meta-analysis. Technical Report 27. National Institute of Statistical Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  7. Greenland, S. (1994). Hierarchical regression for epidemiologic analysis of multiple exposures. Environmental Health Perspectives 102, Suppl. 8, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartley, H. (1974). Multiple frame methodologies and selected applications. Sankhya, series B 36, 99–118.Google Scholar
  9. Hasselblad, V., Eddy, D.M. and Kotchmar, D.J. (1992). Synthesis of environmental evidence: Nitrogen dioxide epidemiology studies. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 42, 662–671.Google Scholar
  10. Hedges, L. and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Mathew, T., Sinha, B. and Zhou, L. (1993). Some statistical procedures for combining independent tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 912–919.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Myers, D. (1993). Change of support and transformations. Geostatistics for the Next Century, R. Dimitrakopoulous (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 253–258.Google Scholar
  13. Overton, J., Young, T. and Overton, W.S. (1993). Using found data to augment a probability sample: Procedure and a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 26, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Patil, G.P. (1991). Encountered data, statistical ecology, environmental statistics, and weighted distribution methods. Environmetrics 2, 377–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Patil, G.P. (1996). Using covariate-directed sampling of EMAP hexagons to assess the statewide species richness of breeding birds in Pennsylvania. Technical Report 95-1102. Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  16. Patil, G.P., Sinha, A.K. and Taillie, C. (1994). Ranked set sampling. Handbook of Statistics Volume 12: Environmental Statistics, G.P. Patii and C.R. Rao (eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 103–166.Google Scholar
  17. Piegorsch, W.W. and Cox, L.H. (1996). Combining environmental information II: Environmental epidemiology and toxicology. Environmetrics 7, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thompson, S.K. (1992). Sampling. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992). Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: Lung cancer and other disorders. Technical Report 600/6-90/006F. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence H. Cox
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSA

Personalised recommendations