Abstract
Naisbett (1982) has identified a “high tech/high touch” future, proposing that for every technological advance (high tech) that is introduced, a counterbalancing human response (high touch) must occur. Nursing has traditionally been an art of high touch. With the introduction of computerized patient information systems, nursing must counterbalance the dehumanizing effects of computerization with the humanizing effects of nursing. Hospitals have lagged considerably behind other businesses in integrating computers (Aiken & Mullinix, 1987). But as more and more hospitals incorporate computerized patient information systems, nursing will become highly dependent upon computer technology (Bongartz, 1988), much as our society is now highly dependent upon electricity. Computerization has the potential to greatly benefit patients and nurses alike. On the other hand, computerization has potentially detrimental effects. Nurses need to recognize some of these pitfalls and then prevent them through appropriate planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aiken, L., & Mullinix, C. (1987). The nurse shortage: Myth or reality? New England Journal of Medicine, 317 (10), 641 – 45.
Batchelor, G. J. (1985). Computerized nursing systems: A look at the marketplace. Computers in Healthcare, 6, 55–56, 58.
Bongartz, C. (1988). Computer-oriented patient care. Computers in Nursing, 6, 204 – 210.
Courtemanche, J. B. (1986). “Gearing-up” for an automated nurse scheduling system in a decentralized setting. Computers in Nursing, 4, 59–67.
Creighton, H. (1978). The diminishing right of privacy: Computerized medical records. Supervisor Nurse, 9 (Feb), 58 – 61.
Dawson, J. (1983). Can computers replace doctors? Private Practice (June), 68 – 71.
Davis, A. J. (1984). Ethical issues in nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 6, 351 – 353.
Edmunds, L. (1984). Computers for inpatient nursing care: What can be accomplished. Computers in Nursing, 2, 102 – 108.
Happ, B. (1983). Should computers be used in the nursing care of patients? Nursing Management, 14 (7), 31 – 35.
Hendrickson, G., & Kovner, C. T. (1990). Effects of computers on nursing resource use: Do computers save nurses time? Computers in Nursing, 8, 16 – 21.
Hiller, M. D., & Beyda, V. (1981). Computers medical records, and the right to privacy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 6, 463 – 487.
Jenkins, C. (1988). Automation improves nursing productivity. Computers in Health-care, 9, 40 – 41.
Johnson, D. (1987). Decisions and dilemmas in the development of a nursing information system. Computers in Nursing, 5, 94 – 98.
Kline, N. W. (1986). Principles of computerized database management: Considerations for the nurse administrator. Computers in Nursing, 4, 73 – 81.
Kovner, C. (1989). Using computerized databases for nursing research and quality assurance. Computers in Nursing, 7, 228 – 231.
Levine, M. E. (1980). The ethics of computer technology in health care. Nursing Forum, 19, 193 – 198.
Mowry, M., & Korpman, R. (1987). Evaluating automated information systems. Nursing Economics, 5, 7 – 12.
Naisbett, J. (1982). Megatrends. NY: Warner Communications.
National Bureau of Standards. (1976). Computers, health records and citizen rights (SD CAT C. No.: C13.44:157). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Norris, J., & Szabo, D. (1981). Removing some impediments to development of America’s third- and fourth-generation health care delivery systems: Legal aspects of computer medicine. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 7, iii–viii.
Romano, C. A. (1987). Privacy, confidentiality and security of computerized systems: The nursing responsibility. Computers in Nursing, 5, 99 – 104.
Romano, C. A. (1990). Innovation: The promise and the perils for nursing and information technology. Computers in Nursing, 8, 99 – 104.
Snyder, K. M., & Galante, M. M. (1984). Medically intelligent computer systems— a nurse’s view. Journal of Clinical Computing, 12 (6), 185 – 192.
Staggers, N. (1988). Using computers in nursing: Documented benefits and needed studies. Computers in Nursing, 6, 164 – 170.
Zielstorff, R. D. (1983). Microtechnology and the future of nursing, in R. E. Dayhoff (Ed.). Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (pp. 572 – 577 ). Silver Spring MD: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yoder, M.E. (1998). Computerized Nursing Information Systems: Benefits, Pitfalls, and Solutions. In: Saba, V.K., Pocklington, D.B., Miller, K.P. (eds) Nursing and Computers. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_27
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7448-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2182-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive