Skip to main content

Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
Breast Cancer

Abstract

Renneker and Cutler, in a 1952 report, were the first to show that two psychological issues face breast cancer patients: anxiety due to the life-threatening nature of the illness and anxiety due to the disfigurement from surgical therapy.1 Quality of life has since become an important issue in the treatment of breast cancer patients, and efforts have been made to develop local therapy that is less disfiguring. Breast conservation therapy is an effort directed toward this end, and it has been well documented that survival after breast conservation therapy is the same as after modified radical mastectomy in patients with early-stage breast cancer.2,3 Despite this advance in therapy, many patients still require or choose modified radical mastectomy for their local therapy. In an effort to provide benefits similar to those of breast conservation therapy to patients who require or choose modified radical mastectomy, techniques have been developed that allow immediate breast reconstruction, which simulates the native breast in such a way that the psychological and emotional trauma from the modified radical mastectomy is negated and the quality of life of the patient is enhanced or maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Renneker R, Cutler M. Psychological problems of adjustment to cancer of the breast. JAMA 1952;148:833–838.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med 1985;312:674–681.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:665–673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Noone RB, Murphy JB, Spear SL, et al. A 6-year experience with immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:258–269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgiade GS, Reifkohl R, Cox E, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:415–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Filberti A, Rimoldi A, Callegari M, et al. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 1990;13:55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, et al. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:713–718.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens LA, McGrath MH, Druss RG, et al. The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:619–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noone RB, Frazier TG, Noone GC, et al. Recurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate reconstruction: a 13-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:96–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ. Changing trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1418–1427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel RT, Webster DJ, Mansel RE, et al. Is immediate postmastectomy reconstruction safe in the long term? Eur J Surg Oncol 1993;19:372–375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Brien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. Am J Surg 1993;166:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slavin SA, Love SM, Goldwyn RM. Recurrent breast cancer following immediate reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1191–1204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Singletary SE. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3:411–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, et al. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4:193–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McGrath MH, Burkhardt BR. The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;74:550–560.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cronin TD, Gerow FJ. Augmentation mammoplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Transitions of the Third International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1964:41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumagai Y, Abe C, Shiokawa Y. Scleroderma after cosmetic surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1979;22:532–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Nunen SA, Gatenby PA, Basten A. Post-mammoplasty connective tissue disease. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:694–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sergott TJ, Limoli JP, Baldwin CM, et al. Human adjuvant disease, possible autoimmune disease after silicone implantation: a review of the literature, case studies, and speculation for the future. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;788:104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brozena SJ, Fenske NA, Cruse CW, et al. Human adjuvant disease following augmentation mammoplasty. Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1383–1386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans GRD, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1111–1115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA. Conventional TRAM versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:828–841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME. Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap? Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:255–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ. The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center’s experience with 211 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32:234–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schusterman, M.A., Gherardini, G. (1999). Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction. In: Singletary, S.E. (eds) Breast Cancer. M.D. Anderson Solid Tumor Oncology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2146-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2146-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7432-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2146-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics