Infected or Substance-Abuse-Impaired Radiologist
Radiologists who suffer from certain physical conditions may pose a potential risk to their patients. This problem has been exacerbated in recent years with the increase in radiologists who have a transmissible blood-borne disease or who are impaired by substance abuse. In addition to the direct liability of the infected or impaired radiologist whose conduct leads to patient injury, the radiology group or hospital may also be liable if it knew or should have known of the radiologist’s condition. A related issue is whether a radiologist’s infected or impaired status must be disclosed as part of the informed consent process.
KeywordsPatient Injury Inform Consent Process Punitive Damage Impaired Status Transmissible Disease
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Principles of medical ethics. In: Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. Chicago: American Medical Association 2000;188:222–224.Google Scholar
- 4.Behringer v Medical Center at Princeton, 592 A2d 1251 (NJ Super 1991).Google Scholar
- 5.Faya v Almaraz, 620 A2d 327 (MD App 1993).Google Scholar
- 6.Babcock v St. Francis Medical Center, 543 NW2d 749 (Neb App 1996).Google Scholar
- 7.Bekker v Humana Health Plan, Inc. 229 F3d 662 (7th Cir US App 2000).Google Scholar
- 8.Howard v Univ of Med and Dentistry of New Jersey, 768 A2d 195 (NJ Super 2001).Google Scholar