Advertisement

The Complex Penile Prosthesis

  • John J. Mulcahy

Abstract

Penile prosthesis placement has remained a predictable and reliable treatment for erectile dysfunction for over two decades. Despite advances in prosthetic design and the use of more durable materials, mechanical problems with these devices may occur. In addition, weakness in the wall of the erectile bodies, the deposition of scar tissue in the penis, problems with blood supply, and the entrance of bacteria into the wound at the time of implant surgery have contributed to a suboptimal result in certain patients. Fortunately, as experience has been gained, the incidence of complications has decreased and the management of problems has become more timely and more gratifying.

Keywords

Scar Tissue Cylinder Head Urethral Stricture Tunica Albuginea Penile Prosthesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fallon B, Ghanem H. Sexual performance and satisfaction with penile prostheses in impotence of various etiologies. Int J Impotence Res 1990; 2: 35–42.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mulcahy JJ. A technique for maintaining penile prosthesis position to prevent proximal migration. J Urol 1987; 17: 294–296.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montague DK, Lakin MM. Early experience with the controlled girth and length expanding cylinder of the American Medical Systems Ultrex penile prosthesis. J Urol 1992; 148: 1444–1446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson SK, Delk JR. The “S” deformity: a complication of AMS 700 ultrex penile prosthesis. Int J Impotence Res 1994; 6 (suppl 1): D168.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson SK, Delk JR. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 152: 1121–1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mulcahy JJ, Rowland RG. Tunica wedge excision to correct penile curvature associated with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1987; 138: 63–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nesbit RM. Congenital curvature of the phallus: report of three cases with description of corrective operation. J Urol 1965; 93: 230–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steidl CS, Mulcahy JJ. Erosion of penile prosthesis: a complication of ureteral catheterization. J Urol 1989; 142: 736–739.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitch WP, Roddy T. Erosion of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into bladder. J Urol 1986; 136: 1080.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ball TP. Surgical repair of penile “SST” deformity. Urology 1980; 15: 603–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parulkar BG, Lamb B, Vickers MA Jr. The detection of leakage in inflatable urinary devices (Abstract). J Urol 1994; 153: 358A (Abstr 519).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Infectious complications of penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol 1988; 139: 953–955.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montague DK. Periprosthetic infections. J Urol 1987; 138: 68–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, et al. Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 1987; 138: 65–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carson CC. Infections in genitourinary prostheses. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 139–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Selim AM. Rescue procedure. An alternative to complete removal for treatment of infected penile prostheses (Abstract). J Urol 1987; 137: 202A (Abstr 396).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Furlow WL, Goldwasser B. Salvage of the eroded inflatable penile prosthesis: a new concept. J Urol 1987; 138: 312–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teloken C, Souto JC, DaRos C et al. Prosthetic penile infection: rescue procedure with rifamycin. J Urol 1992; 148: 1905–1906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moatman TJ, Montague DK. Intracorporeal drainage after removal of infected penile prostheses. Urology 1984; 23: 184–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McClellan DS, Masih BK. Gangrene of the penis as a complication of penile prosthesis. J Urol 1985; 133: 862–863.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John J. Mulcahy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations