Skip to main content

On the Identification of Nonparametric Structural Models

  • Conference paper
Latent Variable Modeling and Applications to Causality

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 120))

Abstract

In this paper we study the identification of nonparametric models, that is, models in which both the functional forms of the equations and the probability distributions of the disturbances remain unspecified. Identifiability in such models does not mean uniqueness of structural parameters but rather uniqueness of policy-related predictions that such parameters would normally support.

We provide sufficient and necessary conditions for identifying predictions of the type “Find the distribution of Y, assuming thatXis controlled by external intervention,” where Y andXare arbitrary variables of interest. Whenever identifiable, such predictions can be expressed in closed algebraic form, in terms of observed distributions. We also show how the identifying criteria can be tested qualitatively using the graphical representation of the structural model, thus simplifying and generalizing the standard identifiability tests of linear models (e.g., rank and order). Finally, we provide meaningful and precise definitions of effect decomposition for both parametric and nonparametric models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alwin, D.F., and Hauser, R.M., “The decomposition of effects in path analysis,”American Sociological Review40, 37–47, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angrist, J.D., Imbens, G.W., and Rubin, D.B., “Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables,” Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Technical Report No. 136, June 1993. To appear inJASA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balke, A., and Pearl, J., “Nonparametric bounds on causal effects from partial compliance data,” Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Technical Report R-199, 1993. Submitted to theJournal of the American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balke, A., and Pearl, J., “Counterfactual Probabilities: Computational Methods, Bounds, and Applications,” In R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence - 10Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 46–54, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balke, A., and Pearl, J., “Counterfactuals and policy analysis in structural models,” In P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 11Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 11–18, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bollen, K.A.Structural Equations with Latent VariablesJohn Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowden, R.J., and Turkington, D.A.Instrumental VariablesCambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox, D.R.Planning of ExperimentsJohn Wiley and Sons, New York, 1958.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean, T., and Kanazawa, K., “A Model for Reasoning about Persistence and Causation,”Computational Intelligence5, 142–150, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, F.M., “A correspondence principle for simultaneous equation models,”Econometrica38, 73–92, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ] Freedman, D., “As others see us: A case study in path analysis” (with discussion)Journal of Educational Statistics12, 101–223, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ] Frisch, R., “Statistical versus theoretical relations in economic macrodynamics,” League of Nations Memorandum, 1938. (Reproduced, with Tinbergen’s comments, inAutonomy of Economic RelationsOslo: Universitetets Socialokonomiske Institutt, 1948). Cited in M.S. MorganThe History of Econometric IdeasCambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galles, D., and Pearl, J., “Axioms of causal relevance,” Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Technical Report R-240, January 1996. Submitted to AAAI-96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galles, D., and Pearl, J., “Testing identifiability of causal effects,” In P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 11Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 185–195, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geiger, D., “Graphoids: A qualitative framework for probabilistic inference,” UCLA, Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geiger, D., and Pearl, J., “On the logic of causal models,”Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial IntelligenceSt. Paul, MN, 1988, pp. 136–147. Also in L. Kanal et al. (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence4, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3–14, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geiger, D., Verma, T.S., and Pearl, J., “Identifying independence in Bayesian networks.”Networksvolume 20, pages 507–534. John Wiley and Sons, Sussex, England, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberger, A.S., Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haavelmo, T., “The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations,”Econometrica11, 1–12, 1943.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lauritzen, S.L., and Spiegelhalter, D.J., “Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems,”Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society Series B50, 154–227, 1988.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Marschak, J., “Economic measurements for policy and prediction,” in T. Koopmans and W. Hood (Eds.)Studies in Econometric Method Cowles Commission Monograph 14Chapter 1, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manski, C.F., “Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects,”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings80, 319–323, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pearl, J.Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligence SystemsMorgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pearl, J., “Graphical models, causality and intervention,”Statistical Science8(3) 266–269, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pearl, J., “A probabilistic calculus of actions,” in R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence10, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp. 454–462, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pearl, J., “Causal diagrams for experimental research,”Biometrika82(4) 669–710, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Pearl, J., “Causal inference from indirect experiments,”Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Journal7, 561–582, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearl, J., “On the testability of causal models with latent and instrumental variables,” In P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 11Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 435–443, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pearl, J., and Robins, J., “Probabilistic evaluation of sequential plans from causal models with hidden variables,” In P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 11Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 444–453, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pearl, J., and Verma, T., “A theory of inferred causation,” in J.A. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall (Eds.)Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceeding of the Second International ConferenceMorgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1991, pp. 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ] Pearl, J., Geiger, D., and Verma, T., “The logic of influence diagrams, in R.M. Oliver and J.Q. Smith (Eds.)Influence Diagrams Belief Nets and Decision AnalysisJohn Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990, pp. 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pratt, J., and Schlaifer, R., “On the interpretation and observation of laws,”Journal of Economics39, 23–52, 1988.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Robins, J.M., “A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period - applications to control of the healthy workers survivor effect,”Mathematical ModelingVol. 7, 1393–1512, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Robins, J.M., “The analysis of randomized and non-randomized AIDS treatment trials using a new approach to causal inference in longitudinal studies,” in L. Sechrest, H. Freeman, and A. Mulley (Eds.)Health Service Research Methodology: A Focus on AIDSNCHSR, U.S. Public Health Service, 1989, pp. 113–159.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robins, J., “Estimation of the time-dependent accelerated failure time model in the presence of confounding factors,”Biometrika79(2), 321–334, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Robins,.J.M., and Greenland, S., “Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects,”Epidemiology3(2), 143–155, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robins, J.M., Blevins, D., Ritter, G., and Wulfsohn, M.“G-Estimation of the Effect of Prophylaxis Therapy for Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia on the Survival of AIDS Patients,”EpidemiologyVol. 3, Number 4, 319–336, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenbaum, P.R., “The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General)147(5), 656–666, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenbaum, P.R., “The role of known effects in observational studies,”Biometrics45, 557–569, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenbaum, P., and Rubin, D., “The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects,”Biometrica70, 41–55, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Rubin, D.B., “Formal modes of statistical inference for causal effects,”Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference25, 279–292, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shafer, G.The Art of Causal Conjecture. MITPress, Cambridge, 1996. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Simon, H.A., Models of Discovery: and Other Topics in the Methods of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Spirtes, P., “Conditional independence in directed cyclic graphical models for feedback,” Department of Philosophy, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA, Technical Report CMU-PHIL-53May1994.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Schienes, R.Causation Prediction and SearchSpringer-Verlag, New York, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Sobel, M.E., “Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models,”Psychometrika55(3), 495–515, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Lauritzen, S.L., Dawid, P.A., and Cowell, R.G., “Bayesian analysis in expert systems,”Statistical Science8(3), 219–247, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Strotz, R.H., and Wold, H.O.A., “Recursive versus nonrecursive systems: An attempt at synthesis,”Econometrica28, 417–427, 1960.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Verma, T.S., “Causal networks: Semantics and expressiveness,” in R. Shachter et al. (Eds.)Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Verma, T.S. and Pearl, J., “Equivalence and synthesis of causal models.” InUncertainty in Artificial IntelligenceElsevier Science Publishers, Cambridge, pages 6, 220–227, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wermuth, N., “On block-recursive regression equations” (with discussion)Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics6, 1–56, 1992.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pearl, J. (1997). On the Identification of Nonparametric Structural Models. In: Berkane, M. (eds) Latent Variable Modeling and Applications to Causality. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 120. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1842-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1842-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94917-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1842-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics