Advertisement

Nonparametric Bayesian Group Sequential Design

  • Pantelis K. Vlachos
  • Alan E. Gelfand
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 133)

Abstract

The customary objective of a group sequential design is the comparison of several treatments or populations. The evolutionary nature of such trials encourages the use of the Bayesian paradigm in the design, monitoring and analysis of these trials. Here we focus on the design issue for the case of continuous, possibly multivariate response at each trial. Our approach is descriptive. Given a model specification, a design is characterized by a number of interim evaluations, the group size for each interim look, and a set of stopping criteria which determine our decision at a given look. By simulating replications of the design we can summarize design performance in terms of when the trial was stopped and reason for stopping. Such simulation and evaluation requires a fully Bayesian model specification for each treatment. We take a nonparametric perspective for the likelihood specification by assuming that the data is drawn from a distribution which arises through Dirichlet process mixing. However, we distinguish a sampling or “what if” prior, reflecting illustrative differences between populations, from a fitting or skeptical prior assuming no differences. By drawing trials under the sampling model, while fitting the model under the fitting prior, Bayesian learning moves us from prior indifference to detection of differences. We illustrate with two examples, one having univariate response, the other bivariate response.

Keywords

Gibbs Sampler Patient Response Under Sampling Dirichlet Process Sampling Prior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antoniak, C. E. (1974), “Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes with Applications to Nonparametric Problems”, The Annals of Statistics, 2, 1152–1174.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, D. A. (1993), “A Case for Bayesianisrn in Clinical Trials”, Statistics in Medicine, 12, 1377–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, D. A. and Ho, C. H. (1988), “One-Sided Sequential Boundaries for Clinical Trials: A Decision-Theoretic Approach”, Biometrics, 44, 219–227.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlin, B. P., Kadane, J. B., and Gelfand, A. E. (1998), “Approaches for Optimal Sequential Decision Analysis in Clinical Trials”, Biometrics (to appear). Google Scholar
  5. Escobar, M. D. and West, M. (1992), “Computing Bayesian Nonparametric Hierarchical Models”, Technical report, ISDS, Duke University.Google Scholar
  6. Escobar, M. D. and West, M. (1995), “Bayesian Density Estimation and Inference Using Mixtures”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 577–588.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferguson, T. S. (1973), “A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems”, The Annals of Statistics, 1, 209–230.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freedman, L. S. and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1989), “Comparison of Bayesian with Group Sequential Methods for Monitoring Clinical Trials”, Controlled Clin. Trials, 10, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelfand, A. E. and Mukhopadhyay, S. (1995), “On Nonparametric Bayesian Inference for the Distribution of a Random Sample”, Canandian Journal of Statistics, 23, 411–420.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. (1990), “Sampling Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelfand, A. E. and Vlachos, P. K. (1995), “Bayesian Clinical Trial Design for Multivariate Categorical Response Models”, Technical Report 9501, Department of Statistics, The University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  12. Geller, N.L. and Pocock, S.J. (1987), “Interim Analyses in Randomized Clinical Trials: Ramifications and Guidelines for Practitioners”, Biometrics, 43, 213–223.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kadane, J. B. (1995), “Prime Time for Bayes”, Controlled Clin. Trials, 16, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kadane, J. B. and Vlachos, P. K. (1998), “Hybrid Methods for Calculating Optimal Sequential Strategies: Data Monitoring for a Clinical Trial”, Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  15. Kuo, L. (1986), “Computations of Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes”, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 7, 60–71.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis, R. J. and Berry, D. A. (1994), “Group Sequential Clinical Trials: A Classical Evaluation of Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Design”, Journal of the American Statistical Association. Google Scholar
  17. O’Brien, P. C. and Fleming, T. R. (1979), “A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials”, Biometrics 35, 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pocock, S.J. (1977), “Group Sequential Methods in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials”, Biometrica, 64, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spiegelhalter, D. J. and Freedman, L. S. (1988), “Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials (with discussion)”, in Bayesian Statistics 3 (eds: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, J.O., DeGroot, M., and Smith, A.F.M.), Oxford University Press, 453–477.Google Scholar
  20. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Freedman, L. S., and Parmar, M. K. B. (1994), “Bayesian Approaches to Randomized Trials (with discussion)”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 157, 357–416.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thall, P. F., Simon, R., and Estey, E. H. (1995), “Bayesian Sequential Monitoring Designs for Single-arm Clinical Trials with Multiple Outcomes”, Statist. in Medicine, 14, 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vlachos, P. K. and Gelfand, A. E. (1996), “Bayesian Decision Theoretic Design for Group Sequential Medical Trials Having Multivariate Patient Response”, Technical Report 96–03, Department of Statistics, The University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pantelis K. Vlachos
  • Alan E. Gelfand

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations