Advertisement

Modeling Travel Demand in Portland, Oregon

  • Katja Ickstadt
  • Robert L. Wolpert
  • Xuedong Lu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 133)

Abstract

An important problem in transportation planning is the modeling of patterns of trip-making—especially trips from home (origin) to work (destination) within a fixed geographic area. The standard tool used to study such OD flows is the so-called “gravity model”, a Poisson log-linear regression model for studying the number of trips from origins within one element of a fixed partition area (traffic analysis zone, for example) to destinations within another.

We present an alternative: a gridless Bayesian hierarchical Poisson/gamma random field model, allowing us to incorporate spatial correlation explicitly. The models are fitted to a subset of data from the 1994/95 METRO survey of Portland, Oregon, and are internally validated on a reserved portion of the survey data. Bayesian posterior probability distributions are calculated using a Markov chain Monte Carlo integration scheme based on a novel method for simulating samples from gamma random fields.

Some key words

Bayesian mixture models gamma process Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., eds., (1964), Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, volume 55 of Applied Mathematics Series, Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards.Google Scholar
  2. Antoniak, C. E., (1974), “Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes with Applications to Bayesian Nonparametric Problems,” Annals of Statistics, 2, 1152–1174.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Akiva, M. and Watanatada, T., (1981), “Application of a Continuous Spatial Choice Logit Model,” in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (eds: C. F. Manski and D. McFadden), 320–343, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Besag, J., (1974), “Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 35, 192–236, (With discussion).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Besag, J., York, J., and Mollié, A., (1991), “Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, 1–59, (With discussion).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Best, N. G., Cowles, M. K., and Vines, S. K., (1995), Convergence diagnosis and output analysis software for Gibbs sampling output,Version 0.3, Cambridge, UK: MRC Biostatistics Unit.Google Scholar
  7. Casey, H. J., (1955), “Applications to traffic engineering of the law of retail gravitation,” Traffic Quarterly, 100, 23–35.Google Scholar
  8. Clayton, D. G. and Kaldor, J., (1987), “Empirical Bayes estimates of age—standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping,” Biometrics, 43, 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cressie, N. A. C., (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Escobar, M. D. and West, M., (1998), “Computing nonparametric hierarchical models,” in Practical Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bayesian Statistics (eds: Dey, D. and Müller, P. and Sinha, D.), New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M., (1990), “Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. J., eds., (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Ickstadt, K. and Wolpert, R. L., (1997), “Multiresolution Assessment of Forest Inhomogeneity,” in Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics,Volume III (eds: C. Gatsonis, J. S. Hodges, R. E. Kass, R. E. McCulloch, P. Rossi, and N. D. Singpurwalla), volume 121 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, 371–386, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. MacEachern, S. (1998). Computations for Mixture of Dirichlet Process models, in Practical Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bayesian Statistics (eds: Dey, D. and Müller, P. and Sinha, D.), New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Matheron, G., (1963), “Principles of geostatistics,” Economic Geology, 58, 1246–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sen, A. and Smith, T. E., (1995), Gravity Models of Spatial Interaction Behavior, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, T. E., (1987), “Poisson Gravity Models of Spatial Flows,” Journal of Regional Science, 27, 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strauss, D. J., (1975), “A Model for Clustering,” Biometrika, 62, 467–476.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tierney, L., (1994), “Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions,” Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1762, (With discussion).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolpert, R. L. and Ickstadt, K., (1998a), “Poisson/gamma random field models for spatial statistics,” Biometrika, to appear.Google Scholar
  21. Wolpert, R.L. and Ickstadt, K., (1998b), “Simulation of Lévy Random Fields,” in Practical Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bayesian Statistics (eds: Dey, D. and Müller, P. and Sinha, D.), New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Ickstadt
  • Robert L. Wolpert
  • Xuedong Lu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations