Synthesis: What Kind of a Discipline Is This Anyhow?

  • Peter M. Groffman
  • Michael L. Pace


We need to evaluate the results of the 1997 Cary Conference and the chapters in this book in terms of: (1) our initial ideas about the factors driving success, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem ecology, and (2) other lessons and ideas that emerged from the presentations and discussions at the conference and in this book. Coming into the conference, we had two “big questions” driving our analysis of successes, limitations, and frontiers. The first question addressed the hypothesis that ecosystem ecology is somewhat unique as a discipline because advances in this field have been driven by the emergence of new environmental problems that could not be addressed with existing conceptual and practical tools. The second question arose from the perception that ecosystem ecology suffers from a lack of cohesion, focus, and justification relative to many other disciplines. Determining whether this perception is true, and evaluating the factors behind these problems was one of our major goals.


Environmental Problem Lyme Disease Ecosystem Research Ecosystem Ecology Ecological Understanding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown, J.H. 1997.An ecological perspective on the challenge of complexity. Ecoessay series number 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Edwards, P. 1995. Ecological progress the meet the challenge of environmental change.Trends in Ecology and Evolution10:261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jones, C.G., and J.H. Lawton. eds. 1994.Linking species and ecosystems.Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Likens, G.E. 1992.The ecosystem approach: its use and abuse.Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.Google Scholar
  5. McDonnell, M.J., and S.T.A. Pickett. eds. 1993.Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas.Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Pickett, S.T.A., R.S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G.E. Likens, eds. 1997.Enhancing the ecological basis of conservation.Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Tjossem, S.F. 1997.Reply to James H. Brown’s “An ecological perspective on the challenge of complexity.” EcoEssay Series Number 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter M. Groffman
  • Michael L. Pace

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations