Monte Carlo Methods: a powerful tool of statistical physics

  • Kurt Binder
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 127)


Statistical mechanics of condensed matter systems (solids, fluids) tries to express macroscopic equilibrium properties of matter as averages computed from a Hamiltonian that expresses interactions of an atomistic many body system. While analytic methods for most problems involve crude and uncontrolled approximations, the Monte Carlo computer simulation method allows a numerically exact treatment of this problem, apart from “statistical errors” which can be made as small as desired, and the systematic problem that a system of finite size is treated rather than the thermodynamic limit. However, the simulations of phase transitions then elucidate how a symmetry breaking arises via breaking of ergodicity, if the Monte Carlo sampling is interpreted as a time average along a stochastic trajectory in phase space, in the thermodynamic limit. These concepts are illustrated for the transition paramagnet-ferromagnet of the Ising model, and unmixing transitions in polymer mixtures. As an example of the application of Monte Carlo to clarify questions about dynamic processes, simulations of interdiffusion in lattice models of alloys are discussed.


Monte Carlo Ising Model Thermodynamic Limit Finite Size Monte Carlo Step 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    K. Binder (ed.) Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin 1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Binder (ed.) Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Binder (ed.) The Monte Carlo Method in Condensed Matter Physics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Binder (ed.) Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science (Oxford University Press, New York 1995)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. Binder and G. Ciccotti (ed.) Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynam­ics of Condensed Matter Systems (Societá Italiana di Fisica Bologna 1996)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    F. Brothard, J. Jouffray, and P. Levinson, Macromolecules 16 2638 (1983)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 6387 (1983); Colloid & Polymer Sci. 265, 273 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. J. Kramer, P. Green, and C. J. Palmstrom, Polymer 25, 437 (1984)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    For a review, see e.g. K. Binder and H. Sillescu, in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, Suppl. Vol. (H. Mark, ed.) p. 297 (Wiley, New York 1979)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. W. Kehr, K. Binder, and S. M. Reulein, Phys. Rev. B 39, 4891 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford 1987)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Compagner, Am. J. Phys. 59, 700 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2 (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1969)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. James, Computer Phys. Commun. 60, 329 (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. M. Ferrenberg, D. P. Landau, and Y. J. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3382 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. N. Barber, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 8(C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz, eds.) Chap. 2 (Academic Press, New York 1983)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. Binder, Z. Physik B 43, 119 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Privman (ed.) Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems (World Scientific, Singapore 1990)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    K. Binder, in Computational Methods in Field Theory (H. Gausterer and C. B. Lang, eds.) p. 59 (Springer, Berlin 1992)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    S. Kämmerer, B. Diinweg, M. d’Onorio de Meo and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2345 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. H. Muser, P. Nielaba and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 51, 2723 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    H. Müller-Krumbhaar and K. Binder, J. Stat. Phys. 8, 1 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. M. Teller and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. M. Ferrenberg, D. P. Landau and K. Binder, J. Stat. Phys. 63, 867 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    R. H. Swendsen, J. S. Wang and A. M. Ferrenberg, in Ref.3Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1941 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    L. Onager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944); N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 85, 808 (1952)Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    H. P. Deutsch and K. Binder, Macromolecules 25, 6214 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. 30, 1477 (1984)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Binder
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für PhysikJohannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations