Skip to main content

Alternative Parenting: A Practitioner’s View

  • Chapter
Book cover Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

A parent is defined as one who brings forth offspring.1 In most cases, offspring result from a husband and wife producing gametes that lead to conception in the mother’s uterus. Unfortunately, this is not always the case, and approximately 15% of reproductive age couples are faced with infertility and left to choose between expensive treatment, adoption, or a foster child.2 New hope for these couples arrived in 1978 when Steptoe and Edwards reported the first livebirth from in vitro fertilization (IVF).3 In vitro fertilization offered women with tubal disease a new technique that would give them a chance at pregnancy. Yet, despite the promise of various assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as in vitro fertilization, gamete intrafallopian tube transfer (GIFT), and zygote intrafallopian tube transfer (ZIFT), many couples still face a childless life. This is particularly true of couples in which the female has either premature ovarian failure or an abnormal or absent uterus. Not until egg donation and surrogacy became available did women with these afflictions have the opportunity to become pregnant. Hence, the introduction of alternatives to treatment, involving principally third parties, has dramatically broadened the spectrum of treatable cases. While the use of third parties is relatively new to the management of infertile females, there is a strong tradition in treating males. Therapeutic donor insemination has long been used in couples limited by male factor infertility.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, Mass: Merriam-Webster, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978; 2: 366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shapiro S, Saphine D, Stone W. Changes in American AID practice during the past decade. Int J Fertil. 1990; 35: 284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gregorie AT, Mayer RC. The impregnators. Fertil Steril. 1965; 15: 130.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kleegman SJ. Therapeutic donor insemination. Fertil Steril. 1954; 5: 7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bunge RG, Sherman JK. Fertilizing capacity of frozen human spermatozoa. Nature. 1953; 172: 767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jalbert P, Leonard C, Selva J, David G. Genetic aspects of artificial insemination with donor semen: the French CECOS federation guidelines. Am J Med Genet. 1989; 33: 269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Subak LL, Adamson GD, Boltz NL. Therapeutic donor insemination: a prospective randomized trial of fresh versus frozen sperm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166: 1597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shenfield F, Doyle P, Valentine A, Steele SJ, Tan S-L. Effects of age, gravidity and male infertility status on cumulative conception rates following artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: analysis of 2998 cycles of treatment in one centre over 10 years. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amuzu B, Laxova R, Shapiro SS. Pregnancy outcome, health of children, and family adjustment after donor insemination. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 899.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Steirtegham AC, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenwillen C, Tournaye H, Derde M-P, Assche EV, Devroey P. Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination: report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 1055.

    Google Scholar 

  13. David A, Avidan D. Artificial insemination donor: Clinical and psychological aspects. Fertil Steril. 1976; 27: 528.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. Human oocyte and preembryo donation: an evolving method for the treatment of infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 1421.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenwaks Z. Donor eggs: their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1987; 47: 895.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baird PA. Ethical issues of fertility and reproduction. Annu Rev Med. 1996; 47: 107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Braverman AM. Ovum donor task force of the Psychological Special Interests Group of The American Fertility Society. Survey results on the current practice of ovum donation programs. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 1216.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sureau C, Shenfield F. Oocyte donation by a daughter. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 1334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Braverman AM, Corson SL. Factors related to preferences in gamete donor sources. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63: 543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Pregnancy after age 50: application of oocyte donation to women after natural menopause. Lancet. 1993; 341: 321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Reversing the natural decline in human fertility: an extended clinical trial of oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA. 1992; 268(10): 1275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lessor R, Cervantes N, O’Connor N, Balmaceda J, Asch RH. An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Snowdon C. What makes a mother? interviews with women involved in egg donation and surrogacy. Birth. 1994; 21: 77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Utian WH, Sheean L, Goldfarb JM, Kiwi R. Successful pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. N Engl J Med. 1985; 313: 1351.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies by the Ethics Committee. Fertil Steril. 1994; 62 (suppl): 71S.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The American Fertility Society. Guidelines for gamete donation. Fertil Steril. 1993; 1: 1S.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McConnell, R.A. (1998). Alternative Parenting: A Practitioner’s View. In: Sauer, M.V. (eds) Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7226-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1640-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics