Skip to main content

Abstract

In 1983 the first woman with ovarian failure gave birth to a healthy child using a donated egg fertilized with her husband’s sperm.1 Since that time the use of donor eggs in alternative reproductive procedures, as well as the number of egg donation programs, has increased at a dramatic rate. Innovative medical techniques offer infertile couples an opportunity to create a pregnancy with at least some of their own genetic material, or in some cases to contribute to the gestational development of their own child. For some, this genetic component carries great weight in their decision to become a parent. Heredity has been shown to create a profound psychological bond between parents and their children.2

The authors would like to thank and acknowledge David Trejo, Esq., for his excellent research compiled for this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lutjen, P, et al. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature. 1984; 174: 307.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schiff, AR. Solomonic Decisions in Egg Donation: Unscrambling the Conundrum of Legal Maternity. 80 Iowa L. Rev. 265, 275.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Anna JV, Mark C, 286 Cal. Rptr. 369, 380–81 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schiff, AR at 269.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cald. 4th 84 at 92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson, SA. Surrogacy Contracts in the 1990’s: The Controversy and Debate Continues. 33 Duq. L. Rev. 903 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Id. at 910.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gostin, L. A Civil Liberties Analysis of Surrogacy Arrangements in Surrogate Motherhood 3 (Larry Gostin ed., 1990) at 13 (citing Brady v US, 397 US, 742, 748 (1970)).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson v Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84, 100 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moschetta v Moschetta, 30 Cal Reptr 2d 893, 894 (Cal 4th App Dist 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson, S at 921.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaycee B at 729.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katz, KD. Ghost Mothers: Human Egg Donation and the Legacy of the Past 57 Alb. L. Rev. 733 (Summer, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaycee B., 42 Cal App 4th 718, n 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schiff, AR at 272.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Id. at 285.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burns, LM. Patient Information and Informed Consent: Current Practice, Legal and Ethical Concerns.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews, LB. Symposium on Biomedical Technology and Health Care: Social and Conceptual Transformations: Technical Article: Alternative Reproduction. 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 623, 655 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Office of Technology Assessment. 100th Cong., 2d Sess., Artificial Insemination Practice in the United States: Summary of a 1987 Survey, at 3 (Comm. Print 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andrews, LB at 655.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Katz, KD at 739.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrews, LB. New Conceptions: A Consumer’s Guide to the Newest Infertility Treatments Including In Vitro Fertilization, Artificial Insemination, and Surrogate Motherhood 158 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andrews at 660.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schiff at 283.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Katz at 772.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Katz at 774.

    Google Scholar 

  28. In Vitro Fertilization: Insurance and Consumer Protection. 109 Harv. L. Rev. 2092, 2103.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Id. at 2104.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andrews, L. Who Is the Patient in Egg Donation? Chicago-Kent College of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Katz at 736.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Prenatal Statistics Unit. Fertility Society of Australia, IVF and Gift Pregnancies: Australia and New Zealand, 1987, at 11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andrews at n 90.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Andrews at 653.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Id. at 634.

    Google Scholar 

  37. In Vitro Fertilization: Insurance and Consumer Protection. 109 Harv. L. Rev. 2092, 2106.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Id. at 2108.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jaycee B. at 718.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Davis v Davis, 842 S.W. 2d 588, 590 (Tenn. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dow, S. Scientists crack secret of freezing eggs. The Australian. 1994, June 20; at 2.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Andrews at 662.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Unif. Parentage Act at 3, 9B U.L.A. 297–98 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Handel, W., Vorzimer, A.W., Shafton, L.A. (1998). Consents and Contracts. In: Sauer, M.V. (eds) Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7226-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1640-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics