Advertisement

The Light Environment of Plant Canopies

  • Gaylon S. Campbell
  • John M. Norman

Abstract

In Ch. 14 plant canopies are treated as big leaves. We did not worry about their structure or the details of how the leaves make up the canopy, we just assumed that we could find a canopy conductance for vapor and boundary layer conductances for heat and vapor. Combining these with the absorbed radiation and soil heat flux densities allowed us to compute canopy temperatures and transpiration rates. We even estimated carbon assimilation rates by knowing transpiration rate or light interception.

Keywords

Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Leaf Area Index Zenith Angle Plant Canopy Diffuse Radiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, M. C., J.M. Norman, G.R. Diak, W.P. Kustas, and J.R. Mecikalski (1997) A two-source time-integrated model for estimating surface fluxes using thermal infrared remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 60:195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, G. S. (1986) Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 36:317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, G.S. (1990) Derivation of an angle density function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 49:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, G. S. and F. K. van Evert (1994) Light interception by plant canopies: efficiency and architecture. In J. L. Monteith, R. K. Scott, and M. H. Unsworth, Resource Capture by Crops. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carlson, T,N., W.J. Capehart, and R.R. Gillies (1995) A new look at the simplified method for remote sensing of daily evapotranspiration. Remote Sensing of Environment 54:161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, J.M. 1996. Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 80:135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fassnacht, K.S., S.T. Gower, J.M. Norman, and R.E. McMurtrie (1994) A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 71:183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuchs. M., G. Stanhill, and S. Moreshet (1976) Effect of increasing foliage and soil reflectivity on the solar radiation balance of wide-row sorghum. Agronomy Journal 68:865–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goudriaan, J. (1977) Crop micrometeorology: a simulation study. Simulation Monographs, Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  10. Goudriaan, J. (1988) The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 43:155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Irons, J., G.S. Campbell, J.M. Norman, D.W. Graham, and W.K. Kovalick (1992) Prediction and measurement of soil bidirectional reflectance. IEEE Transactions of Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 30:249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuusk, A. (1991) The hot spot effect in plant canopy reflectance. In Photon-Vegetation Interactions: Applications in Optical Remote Sensing and Plant Ecology. Eds. R.B. Myneni and J. Ross. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 139–159.Google Scholar
  13. Kuusk, A. (1995) A fast, invertible canopy reflectance model. Remote Sensing of Environment. 51:342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Monteith, J.L. and M.H. Unsworth. (1990) Principles of Environmental Physics. Edward Arnold Publishers, London. 291 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Myneni, R.B. and J. Ross. (eds.) (1991) Photon-Vegetation Interactions: Applications in Optical Remote Sensing and Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 565 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Norman, J.M. (1992) Scaling processes between leaf and canopy levels. In Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. Eds. J.R. Ehleringer and C.B. Field. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, CA pp. 41–76.Google Scholar
  17. Norman, J.M. and G.S. Campbell (1989) Canopy structure. In Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation. Eds. R.W. Pearcy, J. Ehleringer, H.A. Mooney, and P.W. Rundel. Chapman and Hall, N.Y. pp. 301–325.Google Scholar
  18. Norman, J.M. and J.M. Welles (1983) Radiative transfer in an array of canopies. Agronomy Journal 75:481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Walthall, C.L., J.M. Norman, J.M. Welles, G.S. Campbell, and B.L. Blad (1985) Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. Applied Optics. 24:383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Welles, J.M. (1990) Some indirect methods for determining canopy structure. Remote Sensing Reviews. 5:31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaylon S. Campbell
    • 1
  • John M. Norman
    • 2
  1. 1.Decagon Devices, Inc.PullmanUSA
  2. 2.College of Agricultural and Life Sciences SoilsUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations