Advertisement

Mathematical Aspects of Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning: Continuous Inversion Versus Full Discretization and Optimization Versus Feasibility

  • Yair Censor
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 110)

Abstract

A mathematical formulation of the radiation therapy problem consists of a pair of forward and inverse problems. The inverse problem is to determine external radiation beams, along with their locations, profiles, and intensities, that will provide a given dose distribution within the irradiated object. We discuss the inverse problem in its fully discretized formulation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Altschuler, M.D., and Censor, Y., Feasibility solutions in radiation therapy treatment planning. In J.R. Cunningham, D. Ragan, and J. Van Dyk, editors, Proceedings of the Eighth International conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy, IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1984, pp. 220–224.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Altschuler, M.D., Censor, Y., and Powlis, W.D., Feasibility and optimization methods in teletherapy planning, in: Advances in Radiation Oncology Physics (J.A. Purdy, Ed.), Medical Physics Monograph No. 19, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, American Institute of Physics, Inc., New York, 1992, pp. 1022–1057.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bauschke,H.H. and Borwein, J.M., On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems, SIAM Review, 38:367–426, 1996.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Brahme, A., Roos, JE., and lax, I., Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 27:1221–1229, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Brahme, A., Treatment optimization using physical and radiological objective functions, In: A.R. Smith (Editor), Medical Radiology: Radiation Therapy Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1995, pp. 209–246.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brahme, A (Editor), Optimization of the Three-Dimensional Dose Delivery and Tomotherapy, Special Issue of: International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, Volume 6(1), Spring 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Byrne, C. and Censor, Y., Proximity function minimization and the convex feasibility problem for jointly convex Bregman distances, Technical Report, February 1997.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Censor, Y Altschuler, M.D., and Powlis, W.D., On the use of Cimmino’s simultaneous projections method for computing a solution of the inverse problem in radiation therapy treatment planning, Inverse Problems, 4:607–623, 1988.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Censor, Y. and Zenios, S.A., Parallel Optimization: Theory,Algorithms, and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Cho, P.S., Lee, S., Marks Ii, R.J., Redstone, J.A, and Oh, S., Comparison of algorithms for intensity modulated beam optimization: projections onto convex sets and simulated annealing, In: Leavitt, D.D., and Starkschall, G. (Editors), Proceedings of the XII International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy (May 27–30, 1997, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA), Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, 1997, pp. 310–312.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Combettes, P.L., Inconsistent signal feasibility problems: Least-squares solutions in a product space, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, SP-42:2955–2966, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Cormack, A.M. and Quinto, E.T., The mathematics and physics of radiation dose planning using X-rays, Contemporary Mathematics, 113:41–55, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Goitein, M., The inverse problem, International Journal Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 18:489–491, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Gustafsson, A., Development of a versatile algorithm for optimization of radiation therapy, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Stockholm, Sweden, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Gustafsson, A., Lind, B.K., and Brahme, A., A generalized pencil beam algorithm for optimization of radiation therapy, Medical Physics, 21:343–356, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Mackie, T.R., Holmes, T.W., Reckwerdt, P.J., and Yang, J., tomotherapy: Optimized planning and delivery of radiation therapy, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 6:43–55, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Powlis, W.D., Altschuler, M.D., Censor, Y., and Buhle, E.L. JR., Semi-automatic radiotherapy treatment planning with a mathematical model to satisfy treatment goals, International Journal Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 16:271–276, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Raphael, C., Radiation therapy treatment planning: An L 2 approach, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 52:251–277, 1992.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Webb, S., Optimization of conformal radiotherapy dose distribution by simulated annealing, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 34:1349–1370, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Xing, L. and Chen, G.T.Y., Iterative methods for inverse treatment planning, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41:2107–2123, 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yair Censor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations