Advertisement

Modeling Customer Survey Data

  • Linda A. Clark
  • William S. Cleveland
  • Lorraine Denby
  • Chuanhai Liu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 140)

Abstract

In customer value analysis (CVA), a company conducts sample surveys of its customers and of its competitors’ customers to determine the relative performance of the company on many attributes ranging from product quality and technology to pricing and sales support. The data discussed in this paper are from a quarterly survey run at Lucent Technologies.

We have built a Bayesian model for the data that is partly hierarchical and has a time series component. By “model” we mean the full specification of information that allows the computation of posterior distributions of the data — sharp specifications such as independent errors with normal distributions and diffuse specifications such as probability distributions on parameters arising from sharp specifications. The model includes the following: (1) survey respondent effects are modeled by random location and scale effects, a t-distribution for the location and a Weibull distribution for the scale; (2) company effects for each attribute through time are modeled by integrated sum-difference processes; (3) error effects are modeled by a normal distribution whose variance depends on the attribute; in the model, the errors are multiplied by the respondent scale effects.

The model is the first full description of CVA data; it provides both a characterization of the performance of the specific companies in the survey as well as a mechanism for studying some of the basic notions of CVA theory.

Building the model and using it to form conclusions about CVA, stimulated work on statistical theory, models, and methods: (1) a Bayesian theory of data exploration that provides an overall guide for methods used to explore data for the purpose of making decisions about model specifications; (2) an approach to modeling random location and scale effects in the presence of explanatory variables; (3) a reformula-tion of integrated moving-average processes into integrated sum-difference models, which enhances interpretation, model building, and computation of posterior distri-butions; (4) post-posterior modeling to combine certain specific exogenous information — information from sources outside of the data — with the information in a posterior distribution that does not incorporate the exogenous information; (5) trellis display, a framework for the display of multivariable data.

Keywords

Posterior Distribution Markov Chain Monte Carlo Royal Statistical Society Supply Company Model Building Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, J. H. and Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–680.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anscombe, F. J. and Tukey, J. W. (1961). The examination and analysis of residuals, Technometrics 5, 141–160MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, R. A. and Cleveland, W. S. (1996). Trellis Graphics User’s Manual, Math-Soft, Seattle. Internet: b&w or color postscript (224 pages) available from site http://www.cm.bell-labs.com/stat/project/trellisGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, R. A., Cleveland, W. S., and Shyu, M. J. (1996). The Design and Control of Trellis Display, Journal of Computational and Statistical Graphics 5, 123–155. Internet: b&w or color postscript (36 pages) available from site http://www.cm.bell-labs.com/stat/project/trellisGoogle Scholar
  5. Box, G. E. P. and Hunter, W. G. (1965). The Experimental Study of Physical Mechanisms, Technometrics 7, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control, 2nd ed., Holden-Day, Oakland, CA.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Box, G. E. P. (1980). Sampling and Bayes’ Inference in Scientific Modelling and Robustness, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 143, 383–430.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradlow, E. T. and Zaslaysky (1997). A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Ordinal Data from a Customer Satisfaction Survey with “No Answer” Responses. Technical Report, Department of Marketing, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  9. Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing Data, Hobart Press, books@hobart.com.Google Scholar
  10. Cleveland, W. S., Denby, L., and Liu, C. (1998). Random Location and Scale Models for Case Data, in preparation.Google Scholar
  11. Cleveland, W. S. and Liu, C. (1998a). A Theory of Model Building, in preparation.Google Scholar
  12. Cleveland, W. S. and Liu, C. (1998b). Integated Sum-Difference Time Series Models, in preparation.Google Scholar
  13. Daniel, C. and Wood, E. S. (1971). Fitting Equations to Data, Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Draper, D. (1995). Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 57 45–97.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Dempster, A. P. (1970). Foundation of Statistical Inference, Proceedings of the Symposium of the Foundations of Statistical Inference, March 31 to April 9, 56–81.Google Scholar
  16. Draper, D., Hodges, J. S., Mallows, C. L., and Pregibon, D. (1993). Exchangeability and Data Analysis, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A 156, Part 1,9–37.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., and Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian Statistical Infer-ence for Psychological Research, Psychological Review 70, 193–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gale, B. T. (1994). Managing Customer Value, MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398–409.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelman, A., King, G., and Liu, C. (1998). Multiple Imputation for Multiple Surveys (with discussion), Journal of the American Statistical Association, to appear.Google Scholar
  21. Gelman, A., Meng, X-L., and Stern, H. (1996). Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness Via Realized Discrepancies, Statistica Sinica 6, 733–807.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and The Bayesian Restoration of Images, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6, 721–741.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Good, I. J. (1957). Mathematical Tools, Uncertainty and Business Decisions, edited by Carter, C. F., Meredith, G. P., and Shackle, G. L. S., 20–36, Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, B. M. (1986). Some Subjective Bayesian Considerations in The Selection of Models, Econometric Reviews 4, 191–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill, B. M. (1990). A Theory of Bayesian Data Analysis, Bayesian and Likelihood Methods in Statistics and Econometrics, S. Geiser, J. S. Hodges, S. J. Press and A. Zellner (Editors), 49–73, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland).Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, V. E. (1997). An Alternative to Traditional GPA for Evaluating Student Performance (with discussion), Statistical Science, 12, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kass, R. E. and Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes Factors, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 773–795.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kass, R. E., Tierney, L., and Kadane, J. B. (1989). Approximate Methods for Assessing Influence and Sensitivity in Bayesian Analysis, Biometrika 76, 663–674.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, C. (1995). Missing Data Imputation Using the Multivariate t-distribution, The Journal of Multivariate Analysis 53, 139–158.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, C. (1996). Bayesian Robust Multivariate Linear Regression with Incomplete Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 1219–1227.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Longford, N. T. (1995). Models for Uncertainty in Educational Testing, Springer, New York.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., and Teller, A. H. (1953). Equations of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, Journal of Chemical Physics 21, 1087–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo Methods, Journal of the American Statistical Association 44, 335–341.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naumann, E. and Kordupleski, R. (1995). Customer Value Toolkit, International Thomson Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  35. Pinheiro, J., Liu, C., and Wu, Y. (1997). Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t-distribution, Technical Report, Bell Labs.Google Scholar
  36. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and Missing Data, Biometrika 63, 581–592.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubin, D. B. (1984). Bayesianly Justifiable and Relevant Frequency Calculations for The Applied Statistician, The Annals of Statistics 12 1151–1172.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Savage, L. J. (1961). The Subjective Basis of Statistical Practice, unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
  40. Tanner, M. A. and Wong, W. H. (1987). The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation (with discussion), Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 528–55’).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, F. W. (1981). Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data, Psychometrika 46, 357–388.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reference

  1. Best, N.G., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A. and Brayne, C.E.G. (1996). Bayesian analysis of realistically complex models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 159, 323–342Google Scholar
  2. Dawid, A.P. (1979). Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B41, 1–31.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Dellaportas, P. and Stephens, D.A. (1995). Bayesian analysis of errors-in-variables regression models. Biometrics 51, 1085–1095.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelfand, A.E., Dey, D.K. and Chang, H. (1992). Model determination using predictive distributions with implementation via sampling-based methods. In Bayesian Statistics 4 (eds. J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawid and A.F.M. Smith), pp. 147–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein, H. and Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1996). Statistical aspects of institutional performance: league tables and their limitations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 159Google Scholar
  6. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A. and Best, N.G. (1995a). Computation on Bayesian graphical models. In Bayesian Statistics 5 (eds. J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawid and A.F.M. Smith), pp. 407–425. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G. and Gilks, W.R. (1995b). BUGS Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling: Version 0.5, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics, pp. 7177. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.MATHGoogle Scholar

Reference

  1. Bradlow, E.T. (1994), Analysis of Ordinal Survey Data with ‘No Answer’ Responses, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  2. Bradlow, E.T. and Zaslaysky, A.M., A Hierarchical Model for Ordinal Customer Satisfaction Data with “No Answer” Responses, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  3. Cleland Alan S. and Alebert V. Bruno (1997), The Market Value Process: Bridging Customer and Shareholder Value, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Gale, Bradley T. (1994), Managing Customer Value: Creating Quality & Service that Customers Can See, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Slywotzski, Adrian J. (1996), Value Migration: How to think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Additional Reference

  1. Cowles, M. K. and Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 91, 883–904.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statist. Sci., 7, 457–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu, C. and Rubin, D. B. (1996). Markov-normal analysis of iterative simulations before their convergence, J. Econometric, 75, 69–78.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu, C. and Rubin, D. B. (1998). Markov-Normal analysis of iterative simulations before their convergence: reconsideration and application, Technical Report, Bell-Labs, Lucent Technologies and Department of Statistics, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda A. Clark
  • William S. Cleveland
  • Lorraine Denby
  • Chuanhai Liu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations