Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Refinement of the OSSAD Methodology by Multiclient Field Testing

  • Chapter
Perspectives of Information Systems

  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

The OSSAD methodology was developed in the multinational OSSAD project under the ESPRIT program. The methodology offers methods and tools for the analysis, design, and implementation of office support systems. This chapter dis­cusses the interaction of the theoretical and empirical work in the methodology construction, first on a general level and second by using OSSAD as a reference. A framework for the research settings is presented to classify empirical research methods. The goals, conventions, and results of the empirical tests of OSSAD methodology are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antin L. (1985) Selection of a research method. In Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auramäki E, Leppänen M, Savolainen V. (1988) Universal framework for information activities. Data Base 19(1), pp. 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison DE, Fitzgerald G. (1995) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, 2nd ed., London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bariff ML, Ginzberg MJ. (1982) MIS and the behavioral sciences: research patterns and prescriptions. Data Base Fall, pp. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron R, Beslmüller E (eds.). (1989) OSSAD Field Test Report, ESPRIT Project No. 285, R&D Area 4.1, Office Systems Science and Human Factors. Munich: IOT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughard TJ. (1979) Field research methods: interviewing, questionnaires, participant observation, systematic observation, unobstrusive measures. In Dunnette MD (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M. (1967) Scientific Research I, the Search for System. New York: Springer-Ver­lag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrath DW, Dumas PJ (eds.). (1989) Office Support Systems Analysis and Design, Final Report on Office Modelling, Language and OSSAD Methodology, ESPRIT Project No. 285, R&D Area 4.1, Office Systems Science and Human Factors. Munich: IOT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis G. (1982) Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Syst. Journal 21(1), pp. 4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl G. (1980) Framställning och Användning av Informationsmodeller, Ph.D. The­sis, University of Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl G. (1981) On foundations for information systems science—a tentative para­digm analysis. In Kerola P, Koskela E (eds.), Report of the Fourth Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering. Oulu: Institute of Data Processing Science, Uni­versity of Oulu, pp. 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hietala P. (1985) Combining logging, payback and verbal protocols: a method for evaluat­ing interactive systems. In Proc. of the Third Symposium on Empirical Foundations on Information and Software Sciences, Riso, Roskilde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R. (1985) Information systems epistemology. A historical perspective. In Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R, Earl M, Feeny D, Lockett M. (1987) An exploration into the management of the information systems function: key issues and an evolutionary model. Working paper, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R, Klein H, Lyytinen K. (1995) Information Systems Development and Data Modeling, Conceptual and Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari J. (1984) On the dimensions of IS design. Research papers series A5. Oulu: Univer­sity of Oulu, Institute of Data Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen P (ed.). (1980) Empirical research and systemeering models. In Lyytinen K, Pel­tola E (eds.), Report of the Third Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering Models. Jyväskylä: Institute of Computer Science, University of Jyväskylä, pp. 386-­397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna N, Fitzgerald B (eds.). (1996) Information Systems Methodologies: Lessons Learned from the Use of Methodologies. Cork: British Computer Society, University College Cork, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins AM. (1985) Research methodologies and MIS research. In Mumford E, Hir­schheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen J, Savolainen V, Siefen M. (1987) Notes on office systems and modelling. In Järv­inen P (ed.), Report of the 10th IRIS Seminar, Vol. 27. Tampere: University of Tam­pere, Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, pp. 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau F. (1997) A review on the use of action research in information systems studies. In Proceedings of IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference on Information Systems and Quali­tative Research. Philadelphia: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EE. (1985) Challenging traditional research assumptions. In Lawler EE, Mohr-mann AM, Mohrman SA, Ledford GE, Gummings TG (eds.), Doing Research that Is Useful for Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen M. (1988) Abstraction Analysis: A Method for Methodology Development. Manuscript, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen M, Savolainen V. (1988) Refinement of OSSAD methodology by multiclient field tests. In Kaasboll J (ed.), Report of the 11th IRIS Seminar, Oslo, pp. 395–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen M, Savolainen V. (1989a) A classification framework for OIS methodologies. In Boyanov K, Angelinov R (eds.), Network Information Processing Systems. Amster­dam: North-Holland, pp. 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen M, Savolainen V. (1989b) OSSAD application in a Finnish paper machine com­pany—developing strategies for implementation of teleservices in a sales department. In Baron R, Beslmüller E (eds.), OSSAD Field Test Report, ESPRIT Project No. 285, R&D Area 4.1, Office Systems Science and Human Factors. Munich: IOT, Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundeberg M. (1982) The ISAC approach to specification of information systems and its application to the organization of an IF1P working conference. In Olle W, Sol HG, Verrijn-Stuart AA (eds.), Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 173–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML. (1997) The qualitative difference in information systems research and prac­tice. In Proceedings of IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research. Philadelphia: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G, Smircich L. (1980) The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review 5(4), pp. 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday RT, Steers RM (eds.), (1979) Research in Organizations: Issues and Controver­sies. Santa Monica: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen H-E. (1985) Choosing methods for information systems research. Working paper, University of Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan R. (1979) Managing the crisis in data processing. Harvard Business Review, March-April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olle TW, Sol HG, Tully CJ (eds.). (1983) Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olle TW, Sol HG, Verrijn-Stuart AA (eds.). (1982) Information Systems Design Method­ologies: A Comparative Review. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM. (1985) Contextualist research and the study of organizational change pro­cesses. In Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg A. (1985) Socio-technical design, trade union strategies and action research. In Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore SE. (1985) Institutional and organizational issues in doing useful research. In Lawler EE, Mohrmann AM, Mohrman SA, Ledford GE, Gummings TG (eds.), Doing Research that Is Useful for Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 45-­78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk HL. (1973) Management and Organization. Cincinnati: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman GI, Evered RD. (1978) An assessment of scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23, pp. 582–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsrud E. (1976) Complementary roles of action research. In Clark A (ed.), Experiment­ing with Organizational Life. New York: Addison-Wesley, pp. 77–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veryard R. (1987) Implementing a methodology. Information Management 29(9), pp. 469–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel DR, Wetherbe JC. (1984) MIS research: a profile of leading journals and universi­ties. Data Base Fall, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Harper T. (1985) Research methods in information systems: using action research. In Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mauri Leppänen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vesa Savolainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leppänen, M., Savolainen, V. (1999). Refinement of the OSSAD Methodology by Multiclient Field Testing. In: Perspectives of Information Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1464-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1464-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7153-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1464-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation