Overview of the OSSAD Methodology
The Office Support System Analysis and Design (OSSAD) methodology was developed to guide the analysis and design of office organizations and office support systems (OSS) ((Conrath and Dumas, 1989). A new methodology was needed because earlier system design methodologies emphasized technical aspects and ignored the organizational problems in an office environment (Leppänen and Savolainen 1988, Leppänen and Savolainen 1989). The problems of the earlier approaches were numerous (Friedman, 1997, Marcus and Robey, 1988, Schaefer 1988, pp. 40–43, 169–171). The OSSAD project in the ESPRIT Programme was supported by researchers from France, Germany, Canada, Italy, and Finland. During its development it was field-tested and applied in all these countries. This chapter gives a brief overview of this methodology and summarizes the OSSAD Manual (Conrath and Dumas, 1989).
KeywordsNoun Phrase Abstract Model Description Form Loan Officer Graphical Symbol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Conrath DW, Dumas PJ (eds.). (1989) Office Support Systems Analysis and Design, Final Report on Office Modelling, Language and OSSAD Methodology, ESPRIT Project No. 285, R&D Area 4.1, Office Systems Science and Human Factors, IOT, Munich.Google Scholar
- DeMarco T. (1979) Structured Analysis and System Specification. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Dumas P, Charbonnel G. (1990) La Methode OSSAD. Paris: Les Editions D’Organization.Google Scholar
- Dumas P, du Roure G, Zanetti C. (1982) MOBILE¡ªBUROTIQUE: prospects for the future In Naffah N (ed.). Office information systems Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Friedman B (ed.). (1997) Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Leppänen M, Savolainen V. (1988) Refinement of OSSAD methodology by multiclient field tests. In Kaasboll J (ed.), Report of the 11th IRIS Seminar. Oslo: University of Oslo, pp. 395–420.Google Scholar
- Leppänen M, Savolainen V. (1989) A classification framework for OIS methodologies. In Boyanov K, Angelinov R (eds.), Network Information Processing Systems. IFIP TC6&TC8. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science North-Holland, pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
- Peterson JL. (1981) Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Savolainen V. (1989) Technical specification model of an information system. Paper presented at the Tenth International Conference on Systems Science, Wroclaw, Poland.Google Scholar
- Schaefer G. (1988) Functional Analysis of Office Requirements: A Multiperspective Approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sirbu MA, Schoichet SR Jr, Kunin JS, Hammer MM, Sutherland JB, Zarmer CL. (1983) Office Analysis: Methodology and Cases, MIT/LCS/TR-289. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.Google Scholar
- Tardieu H, Rochfeld A, Colletti R. (1984) La M¨¦thode MERISE, Principes et Outils. Paris: Les ¨¦ditions d’Organisation.Google Scholar