Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Environmental Problem Solving pp 156–187Cite as

Single Visions

  • Chapter

  • 210 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Environmental Management ((SSEM))

Abstract

The persistent ineffectiveness that typifies our dealings with complex environmental problems has resulted in a bewildering array of conflicting recommendations about how matters might be improved. Fortunately, there is some underlying pattern to this chaos, with proposals dividing along ideological and disciplinary lines (Table 6.1). Contrasting Imperial and Arcadian pathways are clearly evident, as both sides in the argument propound different routes to disparate goals. Within each ideological pathway, advocates of each perspective emphasize one substantive domain (environmental, social, or psychological) while underplaying the other two domains. This is not to say that proponents of each viewpoint ignore the remaining domains completely, rather, their consideration of the latter is often cursory. The result is at least six broad perspectives on necessary reforms to environmental problem solving. My argument is that, when used as the sole basis for problem solving, each perspective is a form of “single vision,” a singularly inadequate foundation for adaptive behavior. In support of this contention, we should look at the pros and cons of each single vision in turn

Table 1 6.1. Single Visions
Full size table

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, A. 1994. Non-human nature and the ecosystem approach: The limits of anthropocentrism in Great Lakes Management. Alternatives 20:20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cawley, R., and J. Freemuth. 1993. Tree farms, mother earth, and other dilemmas: The politics of ecosystem management in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources 6:41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haeuber, R. 1996. Setting the environmental policy agenda: the case of ecosystem management. Natural Resources Journal 36:1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stanley, T. 1995. Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism. Conservation Biology 9:255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Born, S., and W. Sonzogni. 1995. Integrated environmental management: Strengthening the conceptualization. Environmental Management 19:167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Worster, D. 1977. Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cortner, H., and M. Moote. 1994. Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change. Environmental Management 18:167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caldwell, L. 1994. Disharmony in the Great Lakes Basin: Institutional jurisdictions frustrate the ecosystem approach. Alternatives 20:26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grumbine, R. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8:27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slocombe, D. 1993. Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development. Environmental Management 17:289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palladino, P. 1989. Entomology and Ecology: The Ecology of Entomology. The ‘Insecticide Crisis’ and Entomological Research in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s: Political, Institutional, and Conceptual Dimensions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perkins, J. 1982. Insects experts and the insecticide crisis: The quest for new pest management strategies. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, J., and N. MacLeod. 1996. Integrating ecology into natural resource management policy. Environmental Management 20:289–296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bocking, S. 1994. Visions of nature and society: A history of the ecosystem concept. Alternatives 20:12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fitzsimmons, A. 1996. Sound policy or smoke and mirrors: Does ecosystem management make sense? Water Resources Bulletin 32:217–227.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Botkin, D. 1990. Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, R., et al. 1992. Integrating sustainable development and environmental vitality: A landscape ecology approach. In Watershed management: Balancing sustainability and environmental change ed. R. Naiman, 499–521. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson, I., and D. Welsh. 1993. Integrated resource management in boreal forest ecosystems-impediments and solutions. The Forestry Chronicle 69:32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dryzek, J. 1987. Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gadow, S. 1992. Existential ecology: The human/natural world. Social Science and Medicine 35:597–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Segerstrale, U. 1992. Reductionism, “bad science,” and politics: A critique of anti-reductionist reasoning. Politics and the Life Sciences 11:199- 214.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kay, J., and E. Schneider. 1994. Embracing complexity: The challenge of the ecosystem approach. Alternatives 20:32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  23. More, T. 1996. Forestry’s fuzzy concepts: An examination of ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry 94:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller, A. 1991. Personality types: A modern syn- thesis. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen, M., et al. 1996. Ecosystem management: A landscape ecology perspective. Water Resources Bulletin 32:203–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frissell, C., and D. Bayles. 1996. Ecosystem management and the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and ecological integrity. Water Resources Bulletin 32:229–240.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Slobodkin, L. 1993. Scientific goals require literal empirical assumptions. Ecological Applications 3:571–573.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hilborn, R., and D. Ludwig. 1993. The limits ofapplied ecological research. Ecological Applications 3:550–552.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moir, W., and H. Mowrer. 1995. Unsustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 73:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pitelka, L., and F. Pitelka. 1993. Environmental decision making: Multidimensional dilemmas. Ecological Applications 3:566–568.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Policansky, D. 1993. Uncertainty, knowledge, and resource management. Ecological Applications 3:583–584.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rubenstein, D. 1993. Science and the pursuit of a sustainable world. Ecological Applications 3:585–587.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Socolow, R. 1993. Achieving sustainable development that is mindful of human imperfections. Ecological Applications 3:581–583.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zedler, J. 1993. Lessons on preventing overexploitation? Ecological Applications 3:577–578.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mooney, H., and O. Sala. 1993. Science and sustainable use. Ecological Applications 3:564–566.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Foran, B., and K. Wardle. 1995. Transitions in land use and the problems of planning: a case study from the mountainlands of New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Management 43:97127.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Costanza, R. 1993. Developing ecological research that is relevant for achieving sustainability. Ecological Applications 3:579–581.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Halbert, C. 1993. How adaptive is adaptive management? Implementing adaptive management in Washington State and British Columbia. Reviews in Fisheries Science 1:261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holling, C. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sonntag, N., et al. 1986. Pest management in plantations: A consultative approach. Vancouver, B.C.: ESSA Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Briassoulis, H. 1989. Theoretical orientations in environmental planning: An inquiry into alternative approaches. Environmental Management 13:381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Holling, C. 1995. What barriers? What bridges? In Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions ed. L. Gunderson, C. Holling, and S. Light, 3–34. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McLain, R., and R. Lee. 1996. Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20:437–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Essa, Ltd. 1982. Review and evaluation of Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Vancouver: Environment Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gunderson, L., C. Holling, and S. Light, ed. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosys-tems and institutions. New York:

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, K. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: Integrating ecosystem values. Society and Natural Resources science and politics for the environment. Washing 7:535–546. ton, D.C.: Island Press. 61 Woodley, S., and B. Freedman. 1995. The

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dewhurst, S., W. Covington, and D. Wood. 1995. Developing a model for adaptive ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry 93:35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Grayson, R., J. Doolan, and T. Blake. 1994. Application of AEAM (Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management) to water quality in the Latrobe River catchment. Journal of Environmental Management 41:245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stanford, J., and G. Poole. 1996. A protocol for vation: Lessons from history. Ecological Applica- ecosystem management. Ecological Applications tions 3:547–549. 6:741–744. 64 Meffe, G. 1994. Human population control: The

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cooperrider, A. 1996. Science as a model for ecosystem management-panacea or problem? Ecological Applications 6:736–737.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Miller, A. 1993. The role of citizen scientist in ethics and aesthetics of new forestry. Environ- natural resource decision making. The Environ mental Values 2:191–222. mnentalist 13:47–59. 66 Drengson, A. 1994. Beyond empire resourcism

    Google Scholar 

  52. Baskerville, G., and R. Duinker. 1986. Pest man to ecoforestry. International Journal of Ecoforestry agement in plantations: An institutional analy 10:35–39. sis. In Pest management in plantations: A consul- 67 Camp, O. 1984. The forest farmer’s handbook: Atative approach , ed. N. Sonntag et al. Vancouver, guide to natural selection forest management. Ash-B.C.: ESSA Ltd. land, Oreg.: Sky River Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hilborn, R., C. Walters, and D. Ludwig. 1995. Sustainable exploitation of renewable resources. Annual Review of Ecology and Sytematics 26:45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Meffe, G. 1992. Techno-arrogance and halfway technologies: Salmon hatcheries on the Pacific coast of North America. Conservation Biology 6:350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Christensen, N., et al. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665–691.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Christopherson, J., S. Lewis, and M. Havercamp. 1996. Lake Tahoe’s forest health consen sus group. Journal of Forestry 94:10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Keiter, R. 1996. Toward legitimizing ecosystem management on the public domain. Ecological Applications 6:727–730.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lee, R. 1992. Ecologically effective social organization as a requirement for sustaining water shed ecosystems. In Watershed management: Balancing sustainability and environmental change ed. R. Naiman, 73–89. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Holling, C., and G. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10:328–337.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Heatherington, J., T. Daniel, and T. Brown. 1994.Auything goes means everything stays;The perils of uncritical pluralism in the study of ecosystem values. Society and Natural Resources 7:535–546

    Google Scholar 

  61. Woodley, S., and B. Freedman. 1995. The Greater Fundy Ecosystem Project: Toward ecosystem management. The George Wright Forum 12:7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wilder, R. 1993. Is this holistic ecology or just muddling through? The theory and practice of marine policy. Coastal Management 21:209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ludwig, D., R. Hilborn, and C. Walters. 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: Lessons from history. Ecological Applications 3:547–549.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Meffe, G. 1994. Human population control: The missing awareness. Conservation Biology 8:310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  65. McQuillan, A. 1993. Cabbages and kings: the ethics and aesthetics of new forestry. Environmental Values 2:191–222.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Drengson, A. 1994. Beyond empire resourcism to ecoforestry. International Journal ofEcoforestry 10:35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Camp, O. 1984. The forest farmer’s handbook: A guide to natural selection forest management. Ashland, Oreg.: Sky River Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Drescher, J. 1994. The battle for sustainability. International Journal of Ecoforestry 10: 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Drengson, A., and D. Taylor, eds. 1997. Ecoforestry: The art and science ofsustainable forest use. GabriolaIsland, B.C.: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Clogg, J. 1997. Tenure Reform for Ecologically and Socially Responsible Forest Use in British Columbia. Master’s thesis, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable development: Exploring contradictions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Eckersley, R. 1992. Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Clark, J. 1995. Economic development vs. sustainable societies: Reflections on the players in a crucial contest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Walker, K. 1988. The environmental crisis: A critique of neo-Hobbesian responses. Polity 21:67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Meadows, D. H., et al. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books. 76 Paehlke, R. 1989. Environmentalism and the future of progressive politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Paehke, R. 1989. Environmentalism and the future of progressive politics . New Haven:Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Lewis, M. 1992. Green delusions: An environmentalist critique of radical environmentalism Druham,N.C.;Duke University press.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Gardner, G., and P. Stern. 1996. Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hardin, G. 1993. Living within limits: Ecology economics and population taboos. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Myers, N. 1993. Ultimate security: The environmental basis of political stability. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Reid, E. 1993. Global perspectives and impacts on Canada’s environment. The Forestry Chronicle 69:146–150.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Royal Society of Canada. 1993. Global change and Canadians. Canadian Global Change Program Secretariat, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zimmerman, M. 1995. The threat of ecofascism. Social Theory and Practice 21:207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Fischer, F. 1990. Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of polity analysis. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ophuls, W. 1977. Ecology and the politics of scarcity. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Pacey, A. 1983. The culture of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Arney, W. 1991. Experts in the age of systems. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Smil, V. 1993. Global Ecology: Environmental change and social flexibility. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wong, Y. 1994. Impotence and intransigence: State behavior in the throes of deepening global crisis. Politics and the Life Sciences 13:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Gillis, R., and T. Roach. 1986. Lost initiatives: Canada’s forest industries forest policy and forest conservation. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sandberg, L., ed. 1992. Trouble in the woods: Forest policy and social conflict in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Fredericton, N.B.: Acadiensis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Burrill, G., and I. McKay, eds. 1987. People resources and power: Critical perspectives on underdevelopment and primary industries in the Atlantic region . Fredericton, N.B.: Acadiensis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Parenteau, W. 1989. Pulp, paper and poverty: Then and now: Past and present in the New Brunswick woods. New Maritimes 7:20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Peluso, N., C. Humphrey, and L. Fortmann. 1994. The rock, the beach, and the tidal pool: People and poverty in natural resource-dependent areas. Society and Natural Resources 7:23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  96. West, P. 1994. Natural resources and the persistence of rural poverty in America: A Weberianperspective on the role of power, domination, and natural resource bureaucracy. Society and Natural Resources 7:415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Sessions, G. 1995. Political correctness, ecological realities and the future of the ecology movement. The Trumpeter 12:191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Betts, M., and D. Coon. 1996. Working with the woods: Restoring forests and community in New Brunswick. Fredericton: Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Dunster, J. 1989. Establishing the Geraldton community forest. Phase I: Concepts and background information. Guelph, Ontario: Dunster & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Harvey, J., and D. Coon. 1997. Beyond crisis in the fisheries: A proposal for community-based ecological fisheries management. Fredericton, N.B.: Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Staff Reporter. 1995. N.B. community land trust established. Daily Gleaner November 10. Fredericton, N.B., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Conservation Council of New Brunswick 1994. Public Lands in public hands managing Crown forests in the public Interest a Conservation Council proposal . Fredericton, N.B.: Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Hammond, H. 1991. Seeing the forest among the trees: The case for wholistic forest use. Vancouver: Polestar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Hausler, S. 1993. Community forestry: A critical assessment. The case of Nepal. The Ecologist 23:84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Shepherd, A. 1995. Participatory environmental management: contradiction of process, project and bureaucracy in the Himalayan foothills. Public Administration and Development 15:465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Pinkerton, E. 1994. Local fisheries co-management: A review of international experiences and their implications for salmon management in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 51:2363–2378.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Wilson, J., et al. 1994. Chaos, complexity and community management of fisheries. Marine Policy 18:291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Cassells, D., and P. Valentine. 1988. From conflict to consensus-towards a framework for community control of the public forests and wildlands. Australian Forestry 51:47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Summit News Service. 1997. Concerns expressed about N.B. wood supply. Daily Gleaner March 14, Fredericton, N.B., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  110. McLaughlin, D. 1995. Grounds for change: Linking experience with a vision of sustainable agricul-ture . Fredericton, N.B.: Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Lyng, S. 1988. Theoretical observations on applied behavioral science: Holism and reductionism within applied behavioral science: The problem of clinical medicine. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 24:101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Kipnis, D. 1987. Psychology and behavioral technology. American Psychologist 42:30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  113. De Young, R. 1993. Changing behavior and making it stick: The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior 25:485–505.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Dwyer, W., et al. 1993. Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior 25:275–321.

    Google Scholar 

  115. De Young, R., et al. 1993. Promoting source reduction behavior: The role of motivational information. Environment and Behavior 25:70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Geller, S. 1995. Actively caring for the environment: An integration of behaviorism and humanism. Environment and Behavior 27:184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Oskamp, S. 1995. Resource conservation and recycling: Behavior and policy. Journal of Social Issues 51:157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Eysenck, H., and M. Eysenck. 1985. Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Kempton, W., J. Darley, and P. Stern. 1992. Psychological research for new energy problems: Strategies and opportunities. American Psychologist 47:1213–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Kidner, D. 1994. Why psychology is mute about the environmental crisis. Environmental Ethics 16:359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Jaeger, C., et al. 1993. Determinants of environmental action with regard to climatic change. Climatic Change 23:193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Robottom, I., and P. Hart. 1996. Behaviorist EE research: Environmentalism and individualism. Journal of Environmental Education 27:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Oskamp, S. 1995. Applying social psychology to avoid ecological disaster. Journal of Social Issues 51:217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Hallin, P. 1995. Environmental concern and environmental behavior in Foley, a small town in Minnesota. Environment and Behavior 27:558–578.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Hamid, P., and S. Cheng. 1995. Predicting antipollution behavior: The role of molar behavioral intentions, past behavior, and locus of control. Environment and Behavior 27:679–698.

    Google Scholar 

  126. McKenzie-Mohr, D., et al. 1995. Determinants of responsible environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues 51:139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Grob, A. 1995. A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Karp, D. 1996. Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 28:111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Stern, P., and T. Dietz. 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50:65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Stern, P., et al. 1995. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25:1611–1636.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Finger, M., and P. Verlaan. 1995. Learning our way out: A conceptual framework for social-environmental learning. World Development 23:503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Bragg, E. 1996. Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16:93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Fisher, A. 1996. Toward a more radical ecop-sychology. Alternatives Journal 22:20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Fox, W. 1990. Transpersonalizing ecology: “Psychologizing” ecophilosophy. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 22:59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Reser, J. 1995. Whither environmental psychology?: The transpersonal ecopsychology crossroads. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Roszak, T. 1992. The voice of the earth: An exploration of ecopsychology. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Thomashow, M. 1995. Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmetalist. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Fox, D. 1985. Psychology, ideology, utopia and the commons. American Psychologist 40:48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Franklin, J. 1993. The fundamentals of ecosystem management with applications in the Pacific northwest. In Defining sustainable forestry ed. G. Aplet, et al., 127–143. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

    Alan Miller

Authors
  1. Alan Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, A. (1999). Single Visions. In: Environmental Problem Solving. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1440-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1440-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-40297-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1440-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation