Abstract
Computer modeling and simulation software are transforming the way science and engineering are done. They make possible analytic and conceptual tools that allow scientists to employ new forms of analysis, engage in new kinds of thought experiments, and create new types of theories. In this chapter, we illustrate how such computer-based tools can also transform the practice of science education. We describe how modeling and simulation tools, such as those embodied in our ThinkerTools software, facilitate a variety of instructional approaches that attempt to realize the increasingly ambitious and varied goals being advocated for modern science education. These goals include engaging young students in authentic scientific inquiry in which they learn about the nature of scientific models and the processes of modeling. They also include enabling students to learn abstract and complex subject matter at increasingly younger ages.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. 1996. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 289–325.
diSessa, A. 1993. Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225.
Dunbar, K. 1995. How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, pp. 365–395.
Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. 1989. A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27–32.
Frederiksen, J., & White, B. 1998. Teaching and learning generic modeling and reasoning skills. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 33–51.
Horwitz, P. 1989. Interactive simulations and their implications for science teaching. The 1988 AETS Yearbook
Linn, M. C., Bell, P., & Hsi, S. In press Using the Internet to enhance student understanding of science: The Knowledge Integration Environment.Interactive Learning Environments
Papert, S. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Pea, R. 1994. Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(3)285-299.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. 1994. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3), 265–283.
Schwarz, C., & White, B. 1998a. Fostering middle-school students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Schwarz, C., & White, B. 1998b. The ThinkerTools model-design software and curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Sherin, B., diSessa, A., & Hammer, D. 1993. Dynaturtle revisited: Learning physics through collaborative design of a computer model. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(3), 91–118.
White, B. 1981. Designing computer games to facilitate learning(Tech. Rep. No. AITR-619). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
White, B. 1984. Designing computer activities to help physics students understand Newton’s laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 69–108.
White, B. 1989. The role of intermediate abstractions in understanding science and mathematics. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
White, B. 1993a. ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1–100.
White, B. 1993b. Intermediate causal models: A missing link for successful science education? In Glaser, R. (ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 177–252.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. 1990. Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 99–157.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. 1998. Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. In press. New educational technologies and instructional approaches for facilitating scientific inquiry. In Jacobson, M., and Kozma, R. (eds.), Learning the sciences of the 21st century: Theory, research, and the design of advanced technology learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
White, B., & Horwitz, P. 1988. Computer microworlds and conceptual change: A new approach to science education. In Ramsden, P. (ed.), Improving learning: New perspectives. London: Kogan Page, pp. 69–80.
White, B., & Schwarz, C. 1997. Computer microworlds and scientific inquiry: Enabling students to construct conceptual models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.
White, B., Shimoda, T., & Frederiksen, J. In press. Enabling students to construct a theory of inquiry with SCI-WISE: An approach to facilitating metacognitive development. In Lajoie, S. (ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: the Next Generation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
White, B.Y., Schwarz, C.V. (1999). Alternative Approaches to Using Modeling and Simulation Tools for Teaching Science. In: Feurzeig, W., Roberts, N. (eds) Modeling and Simulation in Science and Mathematics Education. Modeling Dynamic Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1414-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1414-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7135-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1414-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive