Implant Inventory

  • Geoffry Van Flandern


A pivotal ingredient in preoperative planning is implant selection. All revision total hip cases are not performed in centers supplying massive implant inventories. In modern health care, it is difficult for hospitals to justify a large selection of specialized revision components in permanent inventory. As hospital implant inventories shrink, preoperative planning for predicted intraoperative problems becomes critical. The surgeon must fully investigate each revision scenario and plan for a sufficient inventory of equipment to meet all predicted needs.


Acetabular Component Strut Allograft Pelvic Discontinuity Cementless Femoral Component Femoral Allograft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D’Antonio J, Capello W, Borden L, Barger WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1989;243:126–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Padgett D, Kuff L, Rosenburg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty: 3–6 year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:663–673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callaghan J, Salvati E, Pellicci P, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979–1982: a 2–5 year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1074–1085.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Estok D, Harris W. Long term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques: an average 11.7 year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop. 1994;299:190–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gross A, Allan D, Catre M, Garbuz DS, Stockley I. Bone grafts and hip replacement surgery: the pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:679–695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paprosky W, Magnus R. Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: acetabular technique. Clin Orthop. 1994;298:147–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lawrence J, Engh C, Macalino G. Revision total hip arthroplasty: long term results without cement. Clin Orthop. 1993;24:635–644.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cameron H. The two to six year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop. 1994;298:47–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chandler HP, Clark J, Murphy S, McCarthy J, Penenberg B, Danylchuk K, et al. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994;298:67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Antonio J, McCarthy J, Bargar W, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, et al. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;296:133–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pak J, Paprosky W, Jablonsky W, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;295:172–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffry Van Flandern

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations