Skip to main content
  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

The first ileostomies were described in the late 1800s. They initially were used to relieve an obstruction from cancer (1,2). As the use of ileostomies evolved, the ileum was simply brought through a defect made in the abdominal wall. Without any type of maturation, such stomas at approximately one week postoperatively developed a type of pseudo-obstruction at the level of the stoma with a high loss of watery fluid, abdominal cramping, and stoma swelling. “Ileostomy dysfunction” (3) was the term coined to describe this phenomena and the etiology was from serositis. In 1941, Dragstedt applied a skin graft to the exposed serosa to prevent this problem (4). In the 1950s, Crile and Turnbull further refined the maturation process by describing an eversion technique where the seromuscular coat was removed from the distal ileum and the mucosa was everted as a sliding graft (5). The current practice of everting the bowel and suturing it to the dermis was described by Brooke in 1952 (6). Even though this procedure is over 40 years old it is still the most common method employed to construct an ileostomy. Four or five centimeters of terminal ileum are exteriorized beyond the skin such that with eversion and suturing of the bowel edge to the dermis a two or three centimeter ileostomy protrudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nadler LH. General considerations and complications of the ileostomy. Ostomy/Wound Management 1992;38:18–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bubrick MP, Rolstad BS. Intestinal stomas, In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S, eds. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1992;856–874.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warren R, McKittrick LS. Ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Technique, complications and management. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1951;93:555–567.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dragstedt LR, Dack GM, Kirsner JB. Chronic ulcerative colitis: a summary of evidence implicating Bacterium necrophorum as an etiologic agent. Ann Surg 1941;114:653.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crile G Jr, Turnbull RB Jr. The mechanism and prevention of ileostomy dysfunction. Ann Surg 1954;140:459–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brooke BN. The management of an ileostomy including its complications. Lancet 1952;2:102–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leong APK, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RKS. Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:727–729.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ. Prevention and management of ileostomy complications. J ET Nurs 1992;19:48–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan TR, Feldshon SD, Tripp MR. Recurrent stomal bleeding: successful treatment using injection sclerotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:269–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beck DE, Fazio VW, Grundfest-Bromatowski S. Surgical management of bleeding stomal varices. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:343–346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Samaraweera RN, Feldman L, Widrich WC, et al. Stomal varices: percutaneous transhepatic embolization. Radiology 1989;170:779–782.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson RL, Subramanian K, Gasparaitis A, et al. The Indium-111 labeled granulocyte scan in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:451–457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fazio VW. Complications of intestinal stomas. In: Ferrari BT, Ray JE, Gathright JB, eds. Complications of colon and rectal surgery: prevention and management. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1985;227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cairns BA, Herbst CA, Sartor BR, et al. Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum and inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Surg 1994;129:769–772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Histopathology of the skin. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990;214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keltz M, Lebwohl M, Bishop S. Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;27:360–417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwaegerte SM, Bergfeld WF, Senitzer D, et al. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18:559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Callen JP. Pyoderma gangrenosum and related disorders. Adv Dermatol 1989;4:51–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kodner IJ. Stoma complications. In: Fazio VW, ed. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: MC Decker, 1990;424.

    Google Scholar 

  20. AMA Drug Evaluations, 5th ed. American Medical Association, Chicago, 1983;1287-1289.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mulvihill SJ. Perioperative use of octreotide in gastrointestinal surgery. Digestion 1993;54(suppl 1): 33–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kusuhara K, Kusunoki M, Okamoto T, et al. Reduction of the effluent volume in high-output ileostomy patients by a somatostatin analogue, SMS 201-995. Int J Colorect Dis 1992;7:202–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Corman M. Intestinal stomas. In: Colon and rectal surgery, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993; 1118–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Byers JM, Steinberg JB, Postier RG. Repair of parastomal hernias using polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg 1992;127:1246–1247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia: is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 1994;129:413–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Truedson H, Press V. A new method of stomal reconstruction in patients with retraction of conventional ileostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986;162:60–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carey PD, Suvarna SK, Baloch KG, et al. Primary adenocarcinoma in an ileostomy: a late complication of surgery for ulcerative colitis. Surgery 1993;113:712–715.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Starke J, Rodriguez-Bigas M, Marshall W, et al. Primary adenocarcinoma arising in an ileostomy. Surgery 1993;114:125–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hull, T.L. (1999). Ileostomy. In: Michelassi, F., Milsom, J.W. (eds) Operative Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1396-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1396-3_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7130-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1396-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics