Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
From H. Belloc: Cautionary Tales (1907).
Perhaps not so to those who (like Jirka) are familiar with V. Koubek’s paper Set Functors in Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 12 (1971) 175–195. The results in there provide another (completely different) proof of the fact that Problem 4 has a negative answer.
Related problems, — some natural, some unnatural, — some solved, some open —, are contained in the inspiring manuscripts B. Banaschewski and J.J.C. Vermeulen: On the non-functoriality of the maximal ideal space of a commutative ring. Preprint. Dec. 1998.
J. Adámek, H. Herrlich, J. Rosický, and W. Tholen: Injective Hulls are not Natural. Preprint, Dec. 1999.
J. Adámek, H. Herrlich, J. Rosický, and W. Tholen: On a Generalized Small-Object Argument for the Injective Subcategory Problem. Preprint, May 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rhineghost, Y.T., Herrlich, H. (2001). The Functor that Wouldn’t be. In: Koslowski, J., Melton, A. (eds) Categorical Perspectives. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1370-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1370-3_2
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7117-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1370-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive