Skip to main content

The Logic of Nature: Complementarity and the New Biology

  • Chapter
The Conscious Universe
  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

The vitalism-mechanism controversy was a preoccupation of Niels Bohr’s father, a professor of physiology at the University of Copenhagen, and a frequent topic of discussion at the family residence. Although the terms are now archaic, the distinction between a living organism, which must interact with its environment, and a detailed scientific description of that organism, which must treat the system as isolated or isolatable, remains ambiguous. Bohr dealt with fundamental ambiguities in biology the same way that he dealt with fundamental ambiguities in quantum physics—analyze the conditions for observation required for unambiguous description and avoid appeals to extra-scientific or metaphysical constructs.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referecnes

  1. See Niels Bohr, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niels Bohr, `Biology and Atomic Physics,“ in Ibid., pp. 20–1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Niels Bohr, “Light and Life,” in Interrelations: The Biological and Physical Sciences, ed. Robert Blackburn ( Chicago: Scott Foresman, 1966 ), p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Darwin, “The Linnean Society Papers,” in Darwin: A Norton Critical Edition, ed. Philip Appleman ( New York: Norton, 1970 ), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species( New York: Mentor, 1958 ), p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Darwin, Ibid., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  7. lbid., p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lynn Margulis and Dorian Sagan, Microcosmos: Four Billion Years from Our Microbial Ancestors (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. lbid., p. 18

    Google Scholar 

  10. lbid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul Weiss, “The Living System,” in Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences, ed. A. Koestler and J.R. Smythies ( Boston: Beacon, 1964 ), p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Shaxel, Gruduz der Theorienbuldung in der Biologie( Jena: Fisher, 1922 ), p. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Modern Theories of Development: An Introduction to Theoretical Biology, trans. J.H. Woodger (New York: Harper, 1960), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ernst Mayr, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982 ), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P B. Medawar and J.S. Medawar, The Life Sciences: Current Ideas in Biology (New York: Harper and Row, 1977), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lynn Margulis and Dorian Sagan, Microcosmos, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., pp. 78–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Richard M. Laws, “Experiences in the Study of Large Animals,” in Dynamics of Large Mammal Populations, ed. Charles Fowler and Time Smith ( New York: Wiley, 1981 ), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charles Fowler, “Comparative Population Dynamics in Large Animals,” in Dynamics of Large Mammal Populations, pp. 444 5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See David Kirk, ed., Biology Today (New York: Random House, 1975), p. 673.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Charles Elton, Animal Ecology (London: Methuen, 1968), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  27. David Lack, The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954), pp. 29–30, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  28. V.C. Wynne-Edwards, “Self-Regulating Systems in Populations and Animals,” Science, March 1965,147, p. 1543.

    Google Scholar 

  29. James L. Gould, Ethology: Mechanisms and Evolution of Behavior (New York: Norton, 1982), p. 467.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paul Colinvaux, Why Big Fierce Animals Are Rare: An Ecologist’s Perspective( Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978 ), p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peter Farb, The Forest( New York: Time-Life, 1969 ), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peter Klopfer, Habitats and Territories (New York: Basic Books, 1969), P.9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eugene P. Odum, Fundamentals of Ecology (Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971), p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lynn Margulis, Symbiosis in Cell Evolution (San Francisco: Freeman, 1981), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kafatos, M., Nadeau, R. (2000). The Logic of Nature: Complementarity and the New Biology. In: The Conscious Universe. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1308-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1308-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98865-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1308-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics