Abstract
This paper discusses one of the issues that is at the heart of biomagnetism: the non-uniqueness of the inverse problem. Using a Bayesian Statistical approach general reasoning is employed to place restrictions on the fidelity of any source reconstruction algorithm. This paper continues the theoretical development started in [1] and continued in [2] to extract probabilistic information about the biomagnetic inverse problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clarke, C.J.S., In: Nenonen, J., Rajala, H.-M., Katila, T. Biomagnetic localization and 3D mod-elling, Helsinki, TKK offset, 1991.
Hasson, R., and Swithenby, S.J. In: Baumgartner, C., Deeke, L., Stroink, G., Williamson, S.J., BIOMAGNETISM: Fundamental research and clinical applications, 455–457, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1995.
Ioannides, A.A., Bolton, J.P.R., and Clarke, C.J.S. Inverse Problems, 1990, 6: 523–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hasson, R., Swithenby, S.J. (2000). Aspects of Non-Uniqueness: How One Source Affects the Reconstruction of Another. In: Aine, C.J., Stroink, G., Wood, C.C., Okada, Y., Swithenby, S.J. (eds) Biomag 96. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1260-7_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1260-7_55
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7066-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1260-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive