Detection and estimation of changes in ARCH processes

  • Piotr Kokoszka
  • Remigijus Leipus
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 147)

Abstract

Most statistical procedures in time series analysis rely on the assumption that the observed sample has been transformed in such a way as to form a stationary sequence. It is then often assumed that such a transformed series can be well approximated by a parametric model whose parameters are to be estimated or hypotheses related to them tested. Before carrying out such inferences it is worthwhile to verify that the transformed series is indeed stationary or, if a specific parametric model is postulated, that the parameters remain constant. A classical statistical problem, which is an extension of a two sample problem to dependent data, is to test if the observations before and after a specified moment of time follow the same model. In this paper we are, however, concerned with a change-point problem in which the time of change is unknown. The task is to test if a change has occurred somewhere in the sample and, if so, to estimate the time of its occurrence. The simplest form of departure from stationarity is a change in mean at some (unknown) point in the sample. This problem has received a great deal of attention, see e.g. Csörgő and Horváth (1997). Financial returns series have, however, typically constant zero mean, but exhibit noticeable and complex changes in the spread of observation commonly referred to as clusters of volatility.

Keywords

Covariance Volatility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Antoch, J., Hušková, M. and Prášková, Z. (1997). Effect of dependence on statistics for determination of change, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 60: 291–310.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, J. (1994). Least squares estimation of a shift in linear processes, Journal of Time Series Analysis 15: 453–472.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baillie, R., Bollerslev, T. and Mikkelsen, H. (1996). Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 74: 3–30.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, C.-S. (1995). Detecting parameter shift in GARCH models, Econometric Reviews 14: 241–266.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Csörgő, M. and Horváth, L. (1997). Limit Theorems in Change-Point Analysis, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Ding, Z. and Granger, C. (1996). Modeling volatility persistence of speculative returns: A new approach, Journal of Econometrics 73: 185–215.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engle, R. (1995). ARCH Selected Readings, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Giraitis, L., Kokoszka, P. and Leipus, R. (1999). Detection of long memory in ARCH models, Technical report, preprint.Google Scholar
  9. Giraitis, L., Kokoszka, P. and Leipus, R. (2000). Stationary ARCH models: dependence structure and Central Limit Theorem, Econometric Theory. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Gouriéroux, C. (1997). ARCH Models and Financial Applications, Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Horváth, L. (1997). Detection of changes in linear sequences, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 49: 271–283.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horváth, L. and Kokoszka, P. (1997). The effect of long-range dependence on change-point estimators, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 64: 57–81.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horváth, L., Kokoszka, P. and Steinebach, J. (1999). Testing for changes in multivariate dependent observations with applications to temperature changes, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 68: 96–119.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horváth, L. and Steinebach, J. (2000). Testing for changes in the mean and variance of a stochastic process under weak invariance, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Kokoszka, P. and Leipus, R. (1998). Change-point in the mean of dependent observations, Statistics and Probability letters 40: 385–393.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kokoszka, P. and Leipus, R. (1999). Testing for parameter changes in ARCH models, Lithuanian Mathematical Journal 39: 231–247.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kokoszka, P. and Leipus, R. (2000). Change-point estimation in ARCH models, Bernoulli 6: 1–28.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundbergh, S. and Teräsvirta, T. (1998). Evaluating GARCH models, Technical Report No. 292, Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  19. Mikosch, T. and Stäricä, C. (1999). Change of structure in financial time series, long range dependence and the GARCH model, Technical report, preprint available at http://www.cs.nl/~eke/iwi/preprints.
  20. Nelson, D. and Cao, C. (1992). Inequality constraints in the univari-ate GARCH model, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 229–235.Google Scholar
  21. Pasquini, M. and Serva, M. (1999). Clustering of volatility as a multi-scale phenomenon, Technical report, preprint.Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, P. (1991). Testing for strong serial correlation and dynamic conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 47: 67–84.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piotr Kokoszka
  • Remigijus Leipus

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations