Advertisement

Pollutants Resulting from Intraabdominal Tissue Combustion

  • Douglas E. Ott

Abstract

Chemical changes occurring in the abdominal cavity can have direct effects by contact or through peritoneal absorption. Local and global homeostasis is influenced by the unique chemical circumstances of each event. Through its large surface area and proficient absorptive capacity, the peritoneum sustains normal physiologic activities and transfers large quantities of substances that can range from normal constituents to noxious toxins. Laparoscopy exposes the peritoneum to rapid stretching, sustained pressure, a gaseous distending medium, and the changes that occur within the abdominal cavity as a result of access, gas delivery, surgery, irrigation, instrumentation, and energy sources. Electrosurgery, laser, or harmonic scalpel devices used for their desired intentional tissue effects (vaporization, ablation, and coagulation) also can have unintended consequences: aerosol production, dissipation of straying energy, and unintended tissue injury.

Keywords

Pulse Oximetry Hydrogen Cyanide COHb Level Arch Environ Health Smoke Absorption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frietag L, Chapman GA, Sielczak M, Ahmed A, Russin D. Laser smoke effect on bronchial system. Lasers Surg Med 1988; 7:283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baggish MS, Elbakry M. The effects of laser smoke on the lungs of rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156:1260–1265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ott DE. Smoke production and smoke reduction in endoscopic surgery: preliminary report. Endosc Surg 1993; 1:230–232.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ott De. Carboxyhemoglobinemia due to peritoneal smoke absorption from laser tissue combustion at laparoscopy. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16(6):309–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kokasa JM, Eugene J. Chemical composition of laser-tissue interaction smoke plume. J Laser Appl 1989; 1:59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurt TL. Chemical Asphyxiants in Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2nd Ed. New York: William N. Rom, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beebe DS, Swica H, Carlson N, Palahniuk RJ, Goodale RL. High levels of carbon monoxide are produced by electro-cautery of tissue during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:338–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Assessment and Criteria Office. Air Quality Criteria for Carbon Monoxide. Washington, DC: EPA, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Exposure to Carbon Monoxide. DHEW Publ. NIOSH 73-110. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fraser RA, Pare JAP. Inhalation diseases caused by noxious gases and soluble aerosols. In: Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest, Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1977:1529–1550.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cartwright GE. Methomoglobin and sulfhemoglobin. In: Harrison TR, ed. Principles of Internal Medicine, 8th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977:1710–1713.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darling RC, Roughton FJW. The effect of methomoglobin on the equilibrium between oxygen and hemoglobin. Am JPhysiol 1942; 137:56–68.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith RP, Olson MV. Drug-induced methemoglobinemia. Semin Hematol 1973; 10:253–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mihashi W, Ueda S, Hirano M, Tomita Y, Hirohata T. Some problems about condensates induced by CO2 laser irradiation. In: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the International Society for Laser Surgery, Tokyo, Japan, 1981: 2–25–2–27.Google Scholar
  15. 15. West J, ed. Pulmonary Gas Exchange: Physiologic Basis of Medical Practice, 12th Ed. 546–559.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stewart RD, Peterson JE, Baretta ED, Bachard RT, Hosko MJ, Herrman A. Experimental human exposure to carbon monoxide. Arch Environ Health 1970; 21:154–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masters RL. Air pollution—human health effects. In: McCormac, ed. Introduction to the Scientific Study of Atmospheric Pollution. Dordrecht: 1971:97–130.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Curry S. Methemoglobinemia. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:214–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldfrank LR, Price D, Kirstein RH. In: Goldfrank LR, ed. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. Norwalk: Appleton Century Crofts, 1986:319–325.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mansouri A. Review: Methemoglobinemia. Am J Med Sci 1989; 289:200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katsumata Y, Aoki M, Oya M, Suzuki O, Yada S. Forensic application of rapid analysis of carboxyhemoglobin in blood using an oxygen electrode. Forensic Sci Int 1979; 13:151–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering. Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Carbon Monoxide on Human Health, Behavior and Performance. Washington, DC: NAS-NAE, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldsmith JR, Terzaghi J, Hackney JD. Arch Environ Health 1963; 7:647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ekblom B, Huot R. Response of submaximal and maximal exercise at different levels of carboxyhemoglobin. Acta Physiol Scand 1972; 86:474–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiser PC, Morrill CG, Dickey DW. Effect of low-level carbon monoxide exposure on the adaptation of healthy young men to aerobic work at an altitude of 1610 m. In: Folinsbee LJ, ed. Environmental Stress. New York: Academic Press, 1978:198.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spengler JD, Cohen MA. In: Gammage RB, Kaye SV, eds. Indoor Air and Human Health. Boca Raton: Lewis, 1985: 261–278.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clark JN, Lamberson CJ. Pulmonary oxygen toxicity. Pharmacol Rev 1971: 23:37–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grim PS, Gottlieb LJ, Boddie A, Batson E. Hyperbaric oxygen toxicity. JAMA 1990; 263:2216–2220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barker S, Tremer K. The effect of carbon monoxide inhalation on pulse oximetry and transcutaneous PO2. Anes-thesiology 1987; 66:677–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schnapp LM, Cohen NH. Pulse oximetry uses and abuses. Chest 1990; 98:1244–1250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barker SJ, Tremper KK, Hyatt J. Effects of methemoglobinemia on pulse oximetry and mixed venous oximetry. Anesthesiology 1989; 70:112–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tremper KK, Baker SJ. Using pulse oximetry when dys-hemoglobin levels are high. J Crit III 1988; 3:103–107.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zikria BA, Budd DC, Floch F, Ferrer JM. What is clinical smoke poisoning? Ann Surg 1975; 181:151–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas E. Ott

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations