Abstract
Equipment resource “bottlenecks” arise where demand exceeds a-resource’s ability to provide service. Cost allocation systems which control bottlenecks must reconciles three, often incompatible, objectives — Pareto efficiency, incentive compatibility and information efficiency. This research developes such a cost allocation system where there exists a positive cost of waiting for a resource such as a critical piece of equipment, and a positive benefit to using that resource. This costing approach should be useful in determining internal transfer prices for factory machines or departments whose services must be shared by different operations, and which in the absence of discouragement from a significantly high allocated cost, would tend to be overloaded. This research shows that commonly used cost allocation mechanisms cause resource consumers to underconsume resources, and thus lower efficiency. These problems can compound themselves by misleading management into suboptimal use of equipment in the short run, as well as incorrect acquisition of equipment in the long run.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Cook, P. (1972) A One Line Proof of the Slutsky Equation, American Economic Review, v. 42, p. 139
Hage J., A. Aiken and C.B. Arrett (1971) Organization Structure and Communications, American Sociological Review, v. 36, 108–129
Hiromoto, T. (1988) Another Hidden Edge — Japanese Management Accounting, Harvard Business Review, July–August
Hurwicz, L (1977) On the dimensional requirements of informationally decentralized Pareto-satisfactory processes, in K.J. Arrow and L. Hurwicz (eds.), Studies in Resource Allocation Processes, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ., pp. 413–24
Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling (1976) Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, October, pp. 305–60
Kochen, M. and K.W. Deutsch (1980) Decentralization, Oelgheschlager, Gunn & Hain: Cambridge Mass.
Lindley, D.V. [1965] Introduction to Probability and Statistics From a Bayesian Viewpoint, Cambridg: Cambridge University Press, p.188
Malone, T.W. and Smith, S.A. (1988) Modeling the Performance of Organizational Structures, Operations Research, April–May, 421–36
Osana, H. (1978) On the informational size of message spaces for resource allocation processes, Journal of Economic Theory, v.17, pp. 66–78
Roy, R. (1947) La Distribution de Revenu entre les Divers Biens, Econometrica, v. 15, pp. 205–225
Samuelson, P.A. (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, v.36, 387–389
Vancil, R.F. (1978) Decentralization: Managerial Ambiguity by Design, Homewood, IL:Dow Jones-Irwin
Varian, H. (1984) Microeconomics (2nd ed.), New York: Norton
Walker, M. (1977) On the information size of message spaces, Journal of Economic Theory, v.15, pp. 366–75
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Westland, J.C. (1990). Allocated Cost Structures to Control Equipment Usage “Bottlenecks”. In: Greer, W.R., Nussbaum, D.A. (eds) Cost Analysis and Estimating. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0995-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0995-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6976-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0995-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive