Multiaxial Diagnosis: Purposes and Challenges

  • Juan E. Mezzich

Abstract

The multiaxial approach to comprehensive diagnosis, which constitutes one of the fundamental innovations of modern diagnostic systems, has old roots and antecedents. It can be seen as evolving from the contraposition of an analytic, textural, and experiential Aristotelian perspective to a synthetic, bold, and abstract Platonic conceptualization of disease entity as a sufficient description of a patient’s clinical condition. The ontogeny of multiaxial diagnosis can be understood further, as suggested by Ojesjo (1978) following Nietzschean insights on drama, as the point of convergence between, on the one hand, an idealized and rationalistic Apollonian tradition striving for parsimonial order and clarity, and on the other, a Dionysian tradition, vitalistic, empathetic, and closer to the patient. In this scenario, multiaxial diagnosis can be perceived as an attempt at comprehensiveness and sensitivity in the description of the patient’s condition through a standardized, reliable, and structurally coherent schema.

Keywords

Europe Schizophrenia Dition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Revision (DSM-III). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Basset AS, Beiser M (1991). DSM-III: Use of the multiaxial diagnostic system in clinical practice. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 36:270–274.Google Scholar
  3. Bech P, Jhorts S, Lund K, Vilmar T, Kastrup M (1987). An integration of the DSM-III and ICD-8 by global severity assessments for measuring multidimentional outcomes in general hospital psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 75:297–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilikiewicz T (1951). Proba ukladu nozograficznego etioepigenetycznego w psychiatrii. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska 1:68–78 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  5. Bramer GR (1988). 10th Revision of the International Classification. British Journal of Psychiatry 152:29–32 (suppl 1).Google Scholar
  6. Clare A, Gulbinat W, Sartorius N (1992). A triaxial classification of health problems presenting in primary care: A World Health Organization multicentre study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 27:108–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. College of American Pathologists (1965). Systematized Nomenclature of Pathology (SNOP). College of American Pathologists, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. College of American Pathologists (1977). Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED). College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL.Google Scholar
  9. Essen-Möller E, Wohlfahrt S (1947). Suggestions for the amendment of the official Swedish classification of mental disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 47:551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feinstein AR (1988). ICD, POR, and DRG: Unsolved scientific problems in the nosology of clinical medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine 148:2269–2274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernando T, Mellsop G, Nelson K, Peace K, Wilson J (1986). The reliability of the Axis V of the DSM-III. American Journal of Psychiatry 143:752–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Helmchen H (1975). Schizophrenia: Diagnostic concepts in the ICD-8. British Journal of Psychiatry No. 10 (special pub).Google Scholar
  13. Helmchen H (1980). Multiaxial systems of classification. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 61:43–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D (1988). Social relationships and health. Science 241:540–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenkins R, Smeeton N, Shepherd M (1988). Classification of mental problems in primary care. Psychological Medicine 12:1–69 (suppl).Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ (eds) (1989). Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (5th ed). Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  17. Lecomte M, Damey A, Delage E, Marty P (1947). Essai d&3x2019;une statistique synoptique de médicine psychiatrique. Techniques Hospitallers 18:5–8.Google Scholar
  18. Leme Lopes J (1954). As Dimensōes do Diagnostico Psiquiátrico. Agir, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  19. Mezzich JE (1979). Patterns and issues in multiaxial diagnosis. Psychological Medicine 9:125–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mezzich JE (1988). On developing a psychiatric multiaxial schema for ICD-10. British Journal of Psychiatry 152:38–43 (Suppl 1).Google Scholar
  21. Mezzich JE (1990). The World Psychiatric Association and the development of ICD-10. In C Stefanis, AD Rabavilas, CR Soldatos (eds), Psychiatry: A World Perspective. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. Mezzich JE, Coffman GA, Goodpastor SM (1982). A format for DSM-III diagnostic formulation: Experience with 1111 consecutive patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 139:591–596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mezzich JE, Evanczuk KJ, Mathias RJ, Coffman GA (1984). Admission decisions and multiaxial diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry 41:1001–1004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mezzich JE, Kleinman A, Fabrega H, Parron D (eds) (in press). Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Mezzich JE, Sartorius N, Kastrup MC, Katschnig H, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Janca A (1993). Paper presented at the WHO Symposium on ICD-10: A Common Language, Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, May 25, 1993.Google Scholar
  26. Ojesjo L (1978). Psychiatric classification and diagnosis: Some guidelines. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift 32:239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ottoson JO, Perris C (1973). Multidimensional classification of mental disorders. Psychological Medicine 3:238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Percy C, van Holten V, Muir C (1990). International Classification of Diseases for Oncology]. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Rutter M, Shaffer D, Shepherd M (1975). A Multiaxial Classification of Child Psychiatric Disorders. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  30. Rutter M, Levovici S, Eisenberg L, et al (1969). A triaxial classification of mental disorders in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 10:41–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shepherd M (ed) (1985). Handbook of Psychiatry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Wenger N, Mattson M, Furberg C, Elinson J (eds) (1984). Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. Le Jacq Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Williams JBW (1987). Multiaxial diagnosis. In AE Skodol, RL Spitzer (eds), An Annotated Bibliography of DSM-III. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Williams JBW, Goldman H, Gruenberg A, Mezzich JE, Skodol AE, Shaffer D, Spitzer RL, Setterberg S (1990). Towards DSM-IV: The multiaxial system in progress. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41:1181–1182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson M (1993). DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: A history. American Journal of Psychiatry 150:399–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. World Health Organization (1985). Disabilities Assessment Schedule. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  37. World Health Organization (1992). ICD-10 classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan E. Mezzich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations