The Environmental Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  • Michael Hoel
  • Ivar Isaksen
Conference paper
Part of the Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games book series (AISDG, volume 2)

Abstract

An efficient, comprehensive climate policy should balance the cost of reducing emissions of each greenhouse gas (GHG) against the environmental costs of the emissions of the gas. In this paper we show how these environmental costs may be calculated. This is first done for the “traditional” case in which one at any time is only concerned about the state of the climate. We next consider a more general environmental cost function, for which it is assumed that the rate of climate change is more important for the environment and the economy than the state of the climate. Finally, a numerical calculation of marginal costs of GHG emissions for both types of environmental cost functions is presented.

Keywords

Methane Ozone Income Chlorine Geophysics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Barrett, S., “Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements”, CSERGE Working paper GEC 92-34, University of East Anglia and University College London, (1992).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bauer, A., “International Cooperation over Environmental Goods”, mimeo, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut, University of Munich, (1993).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D., “Strategies for the International Protection of the Environment”, Journal of Public Economics 52, 309–328. North-Holland, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cline, W., The Economics of Global Warming, Washington: Institute for International Economics, (1992).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cline, W., “Socially Efficient Abatement of Carbon Emissions”, in: Climate Change and the Agenda for Research, T. Hanisch, ed., West View Press, Boulder, Colorado, (1994).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Crosson, P., “Climate change: problems of limits and policy responses”, in: Greenhouse Warming: Abatement and Adaption, Resources for the Future, Roesenberg et al., eds., Washington, D.C., (1989).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Eckhaus, R., “Comparing the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on global warming”, The Energy Journal 13, 25–34, (1992).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hoel, M., “Harmonization of carbon taxes in international climate agreements”, Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 221–231, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hoel, M. and Isaksen, I., “Efficient abatement of different greenhouse gases”, in: Climate Change and the Agenda for Research, T. Hanisch, ed., West View Press, Boulder, Colorado, (1994).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J., and Ephraums, J.J., eds., Climate Change, The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, (1990).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A., and Varney, S.K., eds., Climate Change 1992, The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, (1992).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Manne, A.S. and Richels, R.G., The costs of stabilizing global CO2 emissions: A probabilistic analysis based on expert judgements, The Energy Journal 15, 31–56, (1994).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Michaelis, P., “Global warming: efficient policies in the case of multiple pollutants”, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 61–78, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Newbery, D., Should carbon taxes be additional to other transport fuel taxes?, The Energy Journal 13, 47–60, (1992).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Nordhaus, W., “The ‘DICE’ Model: Background and Structure of a Dynamic Integrated Climate Model of the Economics of Global Warming”, New Haven: Yale University, Mimeo, (1992).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Pearce, D., “The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming”, The Economic Journal 101, 938–948, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Peck, S.C. and Teisberg, T.J., “CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory Assessment”, The Energy Journal 13, 55–77, (1992).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Reilly, J.M. and Richards, K.R., “Climate change damage and the trace gas index issue”, Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 41–62, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Schmalensee, R., “Comparing greenhouse gases for policy purposes”, The Energy Journal 14, 245–256, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Scott, M.F., A New View of Economic Growth, Oxford: Clarendon Press, (1989).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Tahvonen, O., “Optimal Emission Abatement when Damage Depends on the Rate of Pollution Accumulation”, Proceeding of the Environmental Economics Conference at Ulvon, June 10–13, (1993).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Tahvonen, O., von Storch, H., and von Storch, J., “Atmospheric CO2 Accumulation and Problems in Dynamically Efficient Emission Abatement”, in G. Boero and Z.A. Silberston (eds.): Environmental Economics, Macmillan, London, (1994).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    WMO, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1991, WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 25, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Hoel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ivar Isaksen
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OsloNorway
  2. 2.SNF (Center for Research in Economics and Business Administration)OsloNorway
  3. 3.CICERO (Center for Climate and Energy Research, Oslo, Norway)OsloNorway
  4. 4.Department of GeophysicsUniversity of OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations