Testing the Validity of Value-at-Risk Measures

  • Bertrand Gamrowski
  • Svetlozar Rachev
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 114)


Value at Risk (<VaR >) is a notion meant to measure the risk linked to the holding of an asset or a portfolio of diverse assets. It is defined as the amount of money that one might lose with a certain confidence level and within a given time horizon. It is used by bankers because it allows them to measure, compare and consolidate “risk” that is linked to their trading activities. As it has recently been recommended to bankers by many financial institutions, it may increasingly become more and more widespread, with the possibility of becoming a market standard. Within a given time horizon, the portfolio return should not drop below a stated VaR number more often than predicted by the confidence interval. This paper aims to test this assertion under different methods of estimating VaR. Much of the current literature is devoted to the prediction of volatility, another measure of risk commonly used by bankers. However, the predictive power of Value-at-Risk has not been tested so far.

We show that “classical” ways of estimating VaR are valid only in reasonable ranges of confidence intervals. If bankers are looking at very low quantiles, then they might be advised to employ more sophisticated models.


Implied Volatility Asset Return Market Risk Historical Simulation Hill Estimator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Bac90]
    L. Bachelier, Théorie de la speculation. Annales de l’Ecole Normale Superieure 3, 17, 21–86, 1990.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [Bo187]
    J. Bollerslev, A conditional heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 542–547, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [Bo186]
    T. Bollerslev, Generalized autoregressive conditional heterskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327, 1986.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [BC92]
    J. Bollerslev, T. Chou, S.A. and Kroner, K.F. Arch modelling in finance. Journal of Econometrics, 7, 229–264, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. [BR95]
    J. Boudoukh, M. Richardson, and R. Whitelaw. The stochastic behavior of interest rates. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [BS95]
    J.P. Bouchaud, D. Sornette, C. Walter, and J.P. Aguilar. Taming large events; optimal portfolio theory for strongly fluctuating assets. Working paper Stern School of Business, New York University, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [CF93]
    L. Canina and S. Figlewski. The information content of implied volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 659–681, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [DL92]
    T. Day and C. Lewis. Stock market volatility and the information content of stock index options. Journal of Econometrics, 52, 267–287, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [EK95]
    E. Eberlein and H. Keller. Hyperbolic distributions in finance. Technical Report Inst. für Math., Stochastik, Univ. Freiburg, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [Eng95]
    R.F. Engle. Autoregressive conditional heterskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987–1008, 1995.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [Fe165]
    W. Feller. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol 2 Wiley Eastern Ltd., New York, 1965.Google Scholar
  12. [10R951]
    B. Gamrowski and S.T. Rachev. A testable version of the Pareto-stable CAPM. Working paper Department of Statistics 6.4 Applied Probability, UCSB, Santa Barbara. Google Scholar
  13. [HW91]
    C. Harvey and R. Whaley. S & P 100 index option volatility. Journal of Finance, 46, 1551–1561, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. [HW92]
    C. Harvey and R. Whaley. Market volatility prediction and the efficiency of the S & P 100 index option market. Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 43–74, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [Hi175]
    B.M. Hill. A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Annals of Statistics, 3, 1163–1174, 1975.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [Jor95]
    P. Jorion. Predicting volatility in the foreign exchange market. Journal of Finance, 50/2, 507–528, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [KM95]
    L.B. Klebanov, J.A. Melamed, S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev. Integral and asymptotic representations of geo-stable densities. To appear in Applied Mathematics Letters 1995.Google Scholar
  18. [Koz95]
    T.J. Kozubowski. Geometric stable laws: estimation and applications. Working paper, Department of Mathematics UTC, Chattanooga, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. [LP94]
    M. Loretan and P.C.B. Phillips. Testing the variance stationarity of heavy-tailed time series. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 211–248, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [Man77]
    B.B. Mandelbrot. The fractal geometry of nature. W.M.Freeman 61 Co., New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. [Mcc86]
    J.H. McCulloch. Simple consistent estimators of stable distribution parameters. Communications in Statistics Computation and Simulation, 15, 1109–1136, 1986.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [MR93a.]
    S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev. Modelling asset returns with alternative stable distributions. Econometric Reviews, 12/3, 261–330, 1993a.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [MR93b]
    S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev. Reply to comments on modeling asset returns with alternative stable distributions. Econometric Reviews, 12/3, 347–389, 1993b.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [MR95a]
    S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev, S.T. Modeling financial assets with alternative stable models. To appear in Wiley series in Financial Economics and Quantitative analysis, Wiley 1995a.Google Scholar
  25. [MR95b]
    S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev. Tail estimation of the stable index a. Working paper, Department of Statistics & Applied Probability, 1995b.Google Scholar
  26. [MP95]
    S. Mittnik, A. Panorska and S.T. Rachev. Stable GARCH models for financial time series. Applied Mathematics Letters, 8/5, 33–37, 1995.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [Pet94]
    E.E. Peters. Fractal market analysis, Wiley & Sons, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. [ST94]
    G. Samorodnitsky and M.S. Tagqu. Stable non-gaussian random processes. Chapman and Hall, London, 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [Zo183]
    V.M. Zolotarev. One dimensional stable distributions. Translation of Mathematical monographs, American Mathematical Society, Vol.65, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertrand Gamrowski
  • Svetlozar Rachev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations