Testing the Validity of Value-at-Risk Measures
Value at Risk (<VaR >) is a notion meant to measure the risk linked to the holding of an asset or a portfolio of diverse assets. It is defined as the amount of money that one might lose with a certain confidence level and within a given time horizon. It is used by bankers because it allows them to measure, compare and consolidate “risk” that is linked to their trading activities. As it has recently been recommended to bankers by many financial institutions, it may increasingly become more and more widespread, with the possibility of becoming a market standard. Within a given time horizon, the portfolio return should not drop below a stated VaR number more often than predicted by the confidence interval. This paper aims to test this assertion under different methods of estimating VaR. Much of the current literature is devoted to the prediction of volatility, another measure of risk commonly used by bankers. However, the predictive power of Value-at-Risk has not been tested so far.
We show that “classical” ways of estimating VaR are valid only in reasonable ranges of confidence intervals. If bankers are looking at very low quantiles, then they might be advised to employ more sophisticated models.
KeywordsImplied Volatility Asset Return Market Risk Historical Simulation Hill Estimator
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- [BC92]J. Bollerslev, T. Chou, S.A. and Kroner, K.F. Arch modelling in finance. Journal of Econometrics, 7, 229–264, 1992.Google Scholar
- [BR95]J. Boudoukh, M. Richardson, and R. Whitelaw. The stochastic behavior of interest rates. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, 1995.Google Scholar
- [BS95]J.P. Bouchaud, D. Sornette, C. Walter, and J.P. Aguilar. Taming large events; optimal portfolio theory for strongly fluctuating assets. Working paper Stern School of Business, New York University, 1995.Google Scholar
- [EK95]E. Eberlein and H. Keller. Hyperbolic distributions in finance. Technical Report Inst. für Math., Stochastik, Univ. Freiburg, 1995.Google Scholar
- [Fe165]W. Feller. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol 2 Wiley Eastern Ltd., New York, 1965.Google Scholar
- [10R951]B. Gamrowski and S.T. Rachev. A testable version of the Pareto-stable CAPM. Working paper Department of Statistics 6.4 Applied Probability, UCSB, Santa Barbara. Google Scholar
- [HW91]C. Harvey and R. Whaley. S & P 100 index option volatility. Journal of Finance, 46, 1551–1561, 1991.Google Scholar
- [KM95]L.B. Klebanov, J.A. Melamed, S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev. Integral and asymptotic representations of geo-stable densities. To appear in Applied Mathematics Letters 1995.Google Scholar
- [Koz95]T.J. Kozubowski. Geometric stable laws: estimation and applications. Working paper, Department of Mathematics UTC, Chattanooga, 1995.Google Scholar
- [Man77]B.B. Mandelbrot. The fractal geometry of nature. W.M.Freeman 61 Co., New York, 1977.Google Scholar
- [MR95a]S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev, S.T. Modeling financial assets with alternative stable models. To appear in Wiley series in Financial Economics and Quantitative analysis, Wiley 1995a.Google Scholar
- [MR95b]S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev. Tail estimation of the stable index a. Working paper, Department of Statistics & Applied Probability, 1995b.Google Scholar
- [Pet94]E.E. Peters. Fractal market analysis, Wiley & Sons, 1994.Google Scholar
- [Zo183]V.M. Zolotarev. One dimensional stable distributions. Translation of Mathematical monographs, American Mathematical Society, Vol.65, 1983.Google Scholar