Advertisement

Theoretical and Technical Issues in Identifying a Factor of General Intelligence

  • John B. Carroll

Abstract

A main thrust of Herrnstein and Murray’s The Bell Curve 1 was to describe the role of intelligence in American society, or, in particular, the role of the famous g factor originally postulated by Spearman.2,3 Early on in their book, they made several assertions about g that they believed were “by now beyond significant technical dispute” (p. 22), including the proposition that “[t]here is such a thing as a general factor of cognitive ability on which human beings differ.” It is understandable that they felt able to make such an assertion, in that at least some of the more prominent current experts in psychometrics were on record as holding the view that g exists 4-13 Moreover, they mentioned, or could have mentioned, various social scientists who assume the existence of g.14-16 In citing Snyderman and Rothman’s (1988) survey of opinions in a large sample of educational psychologists and other scholars, they were correct in inferring that most of the respondents in that survey believed that a general factor of intelligence can be identified.17

Keywords

Confirmatory Factor Analysis General Factor Exploratory Factor Analysis Factor Matrix General Intelligence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Herrnstein, R J., and Murray, C. (1994), The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spearman, C. (1904). ‘General Intelligence’, Objectively Determined and Measured,“ American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spearman, C. (1927), The Abilities of Man: Their Nature and Measurement, Macmillan, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, J.B. (1993a), Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eysenck, H.J. (1967), “Intellectual Assessment: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eysenck, H.J. (Ed.) (1982), A Model for Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eysenck, H.J. (1988), Editorial: “The Concept of `Intelligence’: Useful or Useless?” Intelligence,12,1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984), “A Unifying Model for the Structure of Intellectual Abilities,” Intelligence, 8, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988), “Hierarchical Models of Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities,” in R.J. Sternberg (Ed.) Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 4, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 35–71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    . Gustafsson, J.-E. (1989), “Broad and Narrow Abilities in Research on Learning and Instruction,” in R. Kanfer, P.L. Ackerman, and R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, Motivation, and Methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on Learning and Individual Differences,Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 203–237Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humphreys, L.G. (1979), “The Construct of General Intelligence,” Intelligence, 3, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Humphreys, L.G. (1982), “The Hierarchial Factor Model and General Intelligence,” in N. Hirschberg and L. G. Humphreys (Eds.), Multivariate Applications in the Social Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ., pp. 223–239.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensen, A.R. (1980), Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gottfredson, L.S. (1986), “Societal Consequences of the g Factor in Employment,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hunt, E. (1980), “Intelligence as an Information-Processing Concept,” British Journal of Psychology, 71, 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plomin, R., and DeFries, J.C. (1980), “Genetics and Intelligence: Recent Data,” Intelligence, 4, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snyderman, M., and Rothman, S. (1988), The IQ Controversy, The Media and Public Policy, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sternberg, RJ. (1995), “For Whom the Bell Curve Tolls: A Review of The Bell Curve,” Psychological Science, 6, 257–261.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guilford, J.P. (1967), The Nature of Human Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guilford, J.P. (1985), “The Structure-of-Intellect Model,” in B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence: Theories, Measurements, and Applications, Wiley, New York, pp. 225–266.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horn, J.L. (1985), “Remodelling Old Models of Intelligence,” in B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence: Theories,Measurements, and Applications, Wiley, New York, pp. 267–300.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horn, J.L. (1988), “Thinking About Human Abilities,” in J.R. Nesselroade and R.B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, znd ed., Plenum, New York, pp. 645–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horn, J.L., and Noll, J. (1994), “A System for Understanding Cognitive Capabilities: A Theory and the Evidence on Which it Is Based,” in D.K. Detterman (Ed.), Current Topics in Human Intelligence, Vol. 4, Theories of Intelligence, Ablex, Norwood, NJ., pp. 151–203.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ceci, S J. (2990), On Intelligence… More or Less: A Bioecological Treatise on Intellectual Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gardner, H. (1983), Frames ofMind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gould, S.J. (1994, November 28), “Curveball,” [Review of RJ. Herrnstein and C. Murray, The Bell Curve (The Free Press, New York, 1994)] The New Yorker, pp. 139–149Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gould, S J. (1981), The Mismeasure of Man, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  28. z8.
    Carroll, J.B. (1995a), Editorial: “Reflections on Stephen Jay Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man (1981): A Retrospective Review,” Intelligence, 2 1, 121–134Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wall Street Journal, December 13, 1994, p. A18.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T.J., Jr., Boykin, A.W., Brody, N., Ceci, S J., Halpern, D.F., Loehlin, J.C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, RJ., and Urbina, S. (1996), “Intelligence: Known and Unknowns,” American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Galton, F. (1869), Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry Into its Laws and Consequences, Collins, London, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson, R.C., McClearn, G.E., Yuen, S., Nagoshi, C.T., Ahern, F.M., and Cole, R.E. (1985), “Galton’s Data a Century Later,” American Psychologist, 4o, 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pearson, K. (1895), “Regression, Heredity and Panmixia (Abstract),” Proceedings of the Royal Society, 59, 69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Binet, A., and Simon, T. (1905), “Méthodes Nouvelles pour le Diagnostic du niveau Intellectuel des Anormaux” [New Methods for Diagnosing the Intellectual Level of Abnormal Persons], Année Psychologique, 1 1, 191–336.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stem, W. (1916), “Der Intelligenz Quotient als Masz der kindlichen Intelligenz, inbesondere der Unternormal” [The Intelligence Quotient as Measure of Children’s Intelligence, Especially for those Below Normal],“ Zeitschrift fiir angewandte Psychologie, 11, 1–18.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Spearman, C., and Wynn Jones, L. (1950), Human Ability: A Continuation of “The Abilities of Man, Macmillan, London, England.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Holzinger, K.J., and Harman, H.H. (1938), “Comparison of Two Factorial Analyses,” Psychometrika, 3, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thurstone, L.L. (1938), “Primary Mental Abilities.” Psychometric Monographs, No. 1.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spearman, C. (1939), “Thurstone’s Work Reworked,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    . Eysenck, HJ. (1939) Review of Thurstone’s Primary Mental Abilities, 1938, British journal of Educational Psychology, 9, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thurstone, L.L. (1947) Multiple Factor Analysis: A Development and Expansion of The Vectors of Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thurstone, L.L., and Thurstone, T.G. (1941), “Factorial Studies of Intelligence,” Psychometric Monographs, No. 2.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schmid, J., and Leiman, J.M. (1957), “The Development of Hierarchical Factor Solutions,” Psychometrika,22, 53–61.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Carroll, J.B. (1993b), Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies, Appendix B: Hierarchical Factor Matrix Files (Diskettes), Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guilford, J.P., and Hoepfner, R. (1971), The Analysis of Intelligence, McGraw—Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burt, C. (1949), “The Structure of Mind- A Review of the Results of Factor Analysis,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 100–111, 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burt, C. (1955) “The Evidence for the Concept of Intelligence,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vernon, P. E. (1950), The Structure of Human Abilities, Methuen, London, England.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Carroll, J.B. (1968), Review ofJ.P. Guilford’s The nature of human intelligence, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), American Educational Research Journal, 5, 249–256.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Carroll, J.B. (1972), “Stalking the Wayward Factors,” review ofJ.P. Guilford and R. Hoepfner, The Analysis of Intelligence (McGraw-Hill, New York 1971), Contemporary Psychology, 17, 321–324.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cronbach, LJ., and Snow, R.E. (1977), Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook fir Research on Interactions, Irvington, N.Y.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hom, J.L., and Knapp, J.R. (1973), “On the Subjective Character of the Empirical Base of Guilford’s Structure-of-Intellect Model,” Psychological Bulletin, 8o, 33–43.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Guilford, J.P. (1981), “Higher-Order Structure-of-Intellect Abilities,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Harman, H.H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis, 3rd ed., revised, University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cattell, R.B. (1978), The Scientific Use of FactorAnalysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences, Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hakstian, A.R., and Cattell, R.B. (1974), “The Checking of Primary Abilities Structure on a Broader Basis of Performances,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hakstian, A.R., and Cattell, R.B. (1978), “Higher-Stratum Ability Structures on a Basis of Twenty Primary Abilities,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McArdle, J J. (1996), “Current Directions in Structural Factor Analysis,” Current Directions in Behavioral Science, 5, I I-18.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jöreskog, K.G. (1978), “Structural Analysis of Covariance and Correlation Matrices,” Psychometrika, 43, 443–477•MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1989), LISREL 7 User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software, Mooresville, IN.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bentler, P. M. (1985), Theory and Implementation of EQS, a Structural Equations Program, BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sternberg, R J., Wagner, R.K., Williams, W.M., and Horvath, J.A. (1995) “Testing Common Sense,” American Psychologist, 50, 912–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Holzinger, K., and Swineford, E (1939), A Study in Factor Analysis: The Stability ofa Bifactor Solution, Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 48, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Carroll, J.B. (1961), “The Nature of the Data, or How to Choose a Correlation Coefficient,” Psychometrika, 26,347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kaiser, H.F. (1960), “The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Carroll, J.B. (1995b), “On Methodology in the Study of Cognitive Abilities,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Montanelli, R.G., Jr., and Humphreys, L.G. (1976), “Latent Roots of Random Data Correlation Matrices with Squared Multiple Correlations on the Diagonal: A Monte Carlo Study,” Psychometrika, 41, 341–348.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kaiser, H.F. (1958). “The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis,” Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hendrickson, A.E., and White, P.O. (1964), “PROMAX: A Quick Method for Rotation to Oblique Simple Structure,” British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tucker, L.R. and Finkbeiner, C.T. (1981), “Transformation of Factors by Artificial Personal Probability Functions,” Educational Testing Service Research Report RR-81–58, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Tucker, L.R. (1984), personal communication.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    . MacCallum, R. (1986), “Specification Searches in Covariance Structure Modeling,” Psychological Bulletin, l00, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jensen, A.R., and Weng, L.-J.(1994), “What is a Good g?,” Intelligence, 18, 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lord, F.M., and Novick, M. R. (1968), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. With contributions by Allan Birnbaum.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., and Harman, H.H. (1976), Manual for Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests, 1976, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wothke, W, Bock, R.D., Curran, L.T., Fairbank, B.A., Augustin, J.W., Gillet, A.H., and Guerrero, C., Jr. (1991), Factor Analytic Examination of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and the Kit of Factor-Referenced Tests, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Brooks Air Force Base, TX.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Gottfredson, L.S. (1997), “Mainstream Science on Intelligence: An Editorial with 52 Signatories, History, and Bibliography,” Intelligence, 24, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Plomin, R., and Petri11, S.A. (1997), “Genetics and Intelligence: What’s New?,” Intelligence, 24,52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John B. Carroll

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations