Reexamining The Bell Curve

  • Stephen E. Fienberg
  • Daniel P. Resnick

Abstract

Occasionally, very occasionally, big books appear in the social sciences that make scholars and the lay public take notice. Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life is one of those publishing events.1 The Bell Curve is big both in size, more than 850 pages, and in scope. It draws on a large social science database and deals with themes of broad social significance. The authors have provoked a counterliterature of criticism, qualification, and confrontation that has advanced the enterprise of social research. Without the contest over methods, argument, and policy implications that are generated by the publication of such big books, public understanding would lag even further behind scholarship, and scholarship itself would lose its edge.

Keywords

Migration Depression Europe Income Sewage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Herrnstein, R.J. and Murray, C. (1994), The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jencks, C., (1972), Inequality; A Reasseessment of the Effects of Family and Schooling in America, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coleman, J., Hoffman, T., and Kilgore, S. (1982), High School Achievment: Public, Catholic and Private Schools Compared, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson, W.J. (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Wilson, W.J. (1996), When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murray, C. (1984), Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980,Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrnstein, R. (1973), I.Q. in the Meritocracy, Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    7.Taylor,R.M. (1995),“The Bell Curve,” Contemporary Sociology, 24, 153-158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galton, F. (1869), Hereditary Genius, its Laws and Consequences, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kevles, D.J. (1985), In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galton, F. (1883), Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Box, J.F. (1978), R. A. Fisher, The Life of a Scientist, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mackenzie, D.A. (1981), Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930. The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (1995), On Being a Scientist. Responsible Conduct in Research, 2nd ed., National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bennett, J.H. (1983), Natural Selection, Heredity, and Eugenics,Including Selected Correspondence of R. A. Fisher with Leonard Darwin and Others, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fisher, R.A. (1930), The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press, Clarendon; 2nd revised ed., (1958), Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Resnick, D.P. (1982), “History of Educational Testing,” in A.K. Wigdor and W.R. Garner, eds., Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences and Controversies. Part II, pp. 173–194, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    17. Cattell, J.M. (1890), “Mental Tests and Measurements,” Mind, 15, 373-381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fienberg, S.E. (1991), “The History of Statistics in Three and One-Half Chapters,” Historical Methods, 24 (No. 3), 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Itard, J.M.G. (1962) The Wild Boy of Aveyron,translated by George and Muriel Humphrey, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. Lane, Harlan L. (1962), The Wild Boy of Aveyron, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goddard, H.H. (1912), The Kallikak Family, Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chapman, P.D. (1988), Schools as Sorters: Lewis M. Terman, Applied Psychology, and the Intelligence Testing Movement,1890–1930. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terman, L.W. (1922) “Were We Born That Way?,” World’s Work, 44: 660.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cravens, H. (1978), The Triumph of Evolution: American Scientists and the Heredity-Environment Controversy 1900–1941, University of Philadelphia Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terman, L.W. (1924). “The Possibilities and Limitations of Training,” Journal of Educational Research, 10, 335–343.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haller, M. (1963), Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. Taylor, P. (1971), The Distant Magnet: European Emigration to the U.S.A., Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brigham, C. (1923), A Study of American Intelligence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Degler, C. (1991), In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Margolin, L. (1994), Goodness Personified: The Emergence of Gifted Children, Walter de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arlitt, A. (1921), “On the Need for Caution in Establishing Race Norms,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, pp. 179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brigham, C. (1930), “Intelligence Tests of Immigrant Groups,” Psychological Review, 37, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weindling, P. (1989), Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fussell, P. (1989), Wartime: Understanding and Behavior in the Second World War, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anastasi, A. (1958), “Heredity, Environment, and the Question ‘How?’,” Psychological Review, 65, 197–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burks, B.S. (1928), “The Relative Influence of Nature and Nurture Upon Mental Development,” Yearbook for the National Society for the Study of Education, 27, 219–316. Tryon, R.C. (1940), “Genetic differences in maze-learning ability in rats,” Yearbook for the National Society for the Study of Education, 39, 219–316.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ehrman, L., Omenn, G., and Caspari, E. (Eds.) (1972), Genetics, Environment and Behavior: Implications for Educational Policy, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harrington, M. (1963), The Other America: Poverty in the United States, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jensen, A.R. (1969), “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Schoastic Achievement?” Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Block, N.J., and Dworkin, G. eds. (1976), The IQ Controversy, Pantheon Books, New York, pp. 410–540.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bock, R.D., and Moore, E.G J. (1986), Advantage and Disadvantage: A Profile of American Youth, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen E. Fienberg
  • Daniel P. Resnick

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations