Abstract
Although the methods of conformal field theory have given us a wealth of possible string vacuums and a framework in which to begin phenomenology, there are still severe deficiencies in this formulation. First, conformal field theory is necessarily a perturbative formulation. It is based on the first quantized string model propagating on various compactified manifolds. The problem is that the first quantized functional formulation [Eq. (1.2.1)] is based on the sum over conformally inequivalent Riemann manifolds of genus g, which yields a perturbative series of Feynman diagrams. The success of this formulation is that it yields a finite formulation of gravity interacting with quarks and leptons. However, its drawback is that millions of conformal field theories can be constructed using the methods presented in the previous chapters, and there is absolutely no concrete way in which to choose which, if any, of these millions of vacuums corresponds to our real world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Kaku and K. Kikkawa, Phys. Rev. D10, 1110, 1823 (1974).
E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B268, 253 (1986).
S. Giddings and S. Wolpert, Comm. Math. Phys. 109, 177 (1987).
J. Harer, Invent. Math. 72, 221 (1982); Ann. of Math. 121, 215 (1985); J. Harer and D. Zagier, Invent. Math. 85, 457 (1986).
R. C. Penner, in Mathematical Aspects of String Theory, S. T. Yau, ed., World Scientific, Singapore (1986); Comm. Math. Phys. 113, 299 (1987). For reviews, see Refs. 6-10.
M. Kaku, “String Field Theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2, 1 (1987).
W. Siegel, Introduction to String Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore (1988).
T. Banks, SLAC-PUB 3996 (1986).
P. West, CERN/TH-4660 (1986).
C. Thorn, Phys. Rep. 175, 1 (1989).
S. Mandelstam, Nucl. Phys. B64, 205 (1973); B69, 77 (1974).
E. Cremmer and J. L. Gervais, Nucl. Phys. B76, 209 (1974); Nucl. Phys. B90, 410(1975).
W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 142B, 276 (1984); 151B, 391, 396 (1985).
T. Banks and M. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B264, 513 (1986).
W. Siegel and B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. B263, 105 (1985).
H. Hata, K. Itoh, T. Kugo, H. Kunitomo, and K. Ogawa, Phys. Lett. 175B, 138 (1986).
M. D. Freeman and D. I. Olive, Phys. Lett. 175B, 151 (1986).
M. Peskin and C. B. Thorn, Nucl. Phys. B269, 509 (1986).
M. Bochicchio Phys. Lett. 193B, 31 (1987).
O. Alvarez, Nucl. Phys. B216, 125 (1983).
S. Giddings, Nucl. Phys. B278, 242 (1986).
S. Giddings and E. Martinec, Nucl. Phys. B278, 91 (1986).
S. Samuel, Phys. Lett. 181B, 249 (1986).
D. Gross and A. Jevicki, Nucl. Phys. B282, 1 (1987).
E. Cremmer, C. B. Thorn, and A. Schwimmer, Phys. Lett. 179B, 57 (1986).
D. Friedan, E. Martinec, and S. Shenker, Nucl. Phys. B271, 93 (1986).
E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B276, 291 (1986).
C. Wendt, Nucl. Phys. B314, 209 (1989).
C. R. Preitschoff, C. B. Thorn, and S. A. Yost, UFIFT-HEP-89-19; I. Ya. Aref’ eva, P. B. Medvedev, and A. P. Zubarev, SMI-10-1989.
O. Lechtenfeld and S. Samuel, Nucl Phys. B310, 254 (1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaku, M. (2000). String Field Theory. In: Strings, Conformal Fields, and M-Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0503-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0503-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6792-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0503-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive